Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Risk Factors for the Birth of Children with Chromosomal Imbalance in Carriers of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations

  • HUMAN GENETICS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important problem of genetic counseling is to determine the personalized risk of the birth of a child with an unbalanced karyotype in families with reciprocal translocation carriers. The risks of the formation of zygotes with chromosomal imbalance among carriers of balanced autosomal translocations vary significantly. These risks will depend on the most probable type of malsegregation for each specific translocation, leading to the formation of unbalanced gametes, and the probable viability of zygotes, embryos, fetuses, or newborns with unbalanced karyotype. In turn, these probabilities depend on many factors, including cytogenetic and quantitative characteristics of the translocation. During regression analysis of several independent factors and characteristics affecting the segregation behavior of the quadrivalent in meiosis I from 49 autosomal reciprocal translocations, it was found that the terminal location of breakpoints on the chromosomes involved in the translocation is statistically significant, i.e., independently associated with the risk of the birth of a viable child with chromosomal imbalance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Kochhar, P. and Ghosh, P., Reproductive outcome of couples with recurrent miscarriage and balanced chromosomal abnormalities, J. Obstet. Gynecol. Res., 2013, vol. 39, pp. 113—120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Escudero, T., Abdelhadi, I., Sandalinas, M., et al., Predictive value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for translocations, Fertil. Steril., 2003, vol. 79, pp. 1528—1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Munne, S., Analysis of chromosome segregation during preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both male and female translocations heterozigotes, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2005, vol. 111, pp. 305—309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cans, C., Cohen, O., Mermet, M., et al., Human reciprocal translocations: is the imbalanced mode at birth predictable? Hum. Genet., 1993, vol. 21, pp. 228—232.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anton, E., Vidal, F., and Blanco, J., Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior, Genet. Med., 2008, vol. 10, pp. 730—738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim, C., Cho, J., Song, I., et al., Estimation of chromosomal imbalances in preimplantation embryos from preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles of reciprocal translocations with or without acrocentric chromosomes, Fertil. Steril., 2008, vol. 90, pp. 2144—2151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, Y., Qian, Y., Xu, C., et al., Meiotic segregation analysis of embryos from reciprocal translocation carriers in PGD cycles, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2012, vol. 24, pp. 83—90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dul, E., Echten-Arends, J., Groen, H., et al., Can characteristics of reciprocal translocations predict the chance of transferable embryos in PGD cycles? J. Clin. Med., 2014, vol. 3, pp. 348—358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Y., Zhu, S., Wu, J., et al., Quadrivalent asymmetry in reciprocal translocation carriers predict meiotic segregation patterns in cleavage stage embryos, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 2014, vol. 29(4), pp. 490—498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scriven, P., Flinter, F., Khalaf, Y., et al., Benefits and drawbacks of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocations: lessons from a prospective cohort study, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 2013, vol. 21, pp. 1035—1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xanthopoulou, L., Mantzouratou, A., Mania, A., et al., When is old too old for preimplantation genetic diagnosis for reciprocal translocations? Prenatal Diagn., 2011, vol. 31, pp. 1002—1006. doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Derwerken, D., Bayesian assessment of genetic risk in families with a balanced translocation, J. Genet. Couns., 2015, vol. 24, pp. 541—547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Young, I., Introduction to Risk Calculation in Genetic Counseling, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007, 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner, R.J. and Amor, D.J., Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling, no. 4 of Oxford Monographs of Medical Genetics, International Oxford Press, 2018, 5th ed. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199329007.001.0001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kabakoff, R.I., R in Action: Data Analysis and Graphics with R, New York: Manning, 2015, 2ed.

  16. Shipunov, A.B., Baldin, E.M., Volkova, A.I., et al., Naglyadnaya statistika: ispol’zuem R! (Visual Statistics: Use R!), Moscow: DMK Press, 2012.

  17. Cans, C., Cohen, O., Lavergne, C., et al., Logistic regression model to estimate the risk of unbalanced offspring in reciprocal translocations, Hum. Genet., 1993, vol. 92, pp. 598—604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aguilar, J., Bacallao-Guerra, J., Bacallao-Gallestey, J., et al., Estimating the risk for unbalanced chromosomal aberrations in the offspring from translocation-carrying parents, Biotecnol. Appl., 2011, vol. 28, pp. 156—160.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shaffer, L., McGowan-Jordan, J., and Schmid, M., An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN), Basel: Int. Karger, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. De Perdigo, A., Gabriel-Robez, O., Ratomponirina, C., and Rumpler, Y., Synaptonemal complex analysis in a human male carrier of a 4;6 translocation: heterosynapsis without previous homosinapsis, Hum. Genet., 1991, vol. 86, pp. 279—282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Shilova.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants are in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from each participant involved in the study.

Additional information

Translated by D. Novikova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shilova, N.V., Minzhenkova, M.E. & Antonenko, V.G. Evaluation of Risk Factors for the Birth of Children with Chromosomal Imbalance in Carriers of Autosomal Reciprocal Translocations. Russ J Genet 55, 1103–1112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419090151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419090151

Keywords:

Navigation