Skip to main content
Log in

Traces of Sublethal Injuries in Upper Cretaceous Echinoid Tests from the Vicinity of Volsk (Lower Volga Region)

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three species of echinoids Conulus matesovi Moskvin, Echinocorys ovata (Leske) and Micraster corbovis Forbes from Turonian and Campanian deposits of Lower Volga region, with traces of the sublethal injuries in the tests, are described. Such injuries are of particular interest as they are not related to commensalism, predation, parasitism, or other effects of different animals, but are the result of a mechanical collision of echinoid tests with empty shells of inoceramids, which resulted in a foreign object being embedded and remaining in the tests but did not lead to their destruction or the death of the organism. Formation conditions and taphonomic aspects of the occurrences are considered. Possible mechanisms of sublethal injuries are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Abdelhamid, M.A.M., Parasitism, abnormal growth and predation on Cretaceous echinoids from Egypt, Rev. Paleobiol., 1999, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alekseev, A.S. and Endel’man, L.G., Association of ectoparasitic prosobranch gastropods with Late Cretaceous echinoids Galerites, in Problemy izucheniya iskopaemykh i sovremennykh iglokozhikh (Problems of the Study of Fossil and Modern Echinoderms), Tallinn: Inst. Geol. Akad. Nauk Eston. SSR, 1989, pp. 166–174.

  3. Donovan, S.K. and Jagt, J.W.M., Site selectivity of pits in the Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) echinoid Echinocorys Leske from France, Bull. Mizunami Fossil Mus., 2004, no. 31, pp. 21–24.

  4. Donovan, S.K., Jagt, J.W.M., and Dols, P.P.M.A., Ichnology of late cretaceous echinoids from the Maastrichtian type area (the Netherlands, Belgium). 2. A pentagonal attachment scar on Echinocorys gr. conoidea (Goldfuss), Bull. Mizunami Fossil Mus., 2010, no. 36, pp. 51–53.

  5. Donovan, S.K. and Jagt, J.W.M., Ichnology of Late Cretaceous echinoids from the Maastrichtian type area (the Netherlands, Belgium). 3. Podichnus Bromley and Surlyk and a crinoid attachments on the echinoid Echinocorys Leske from the Lixhe aria, Belgium, Bull. Mizunami Fossil Mus., 2014, no. 40, pp. 75–78.

  6. Dzhabarov, G.N., Verkhnemelovye morskie ezhi tsentral’nogo Kopet-Daga (Upper Cretaceous Echinoids of the Central Kopet-Dag), Ashkhabat: Turkmen. Izd., 1964.

  7. Forbes, E., Notes on Cretaceous Echinodermata, in The Geology and Fossils of the Tertiary and Cretaceous Formations of Sussex, Dixon, F., Ed., London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1850, pp. 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frerichs, U., Seltene (irregulare) Seeigel aus dem Campan von Hover und Misburg, Arbeitskreis paläontologie Hannover, 2003, no. 1, pp. 1–13.

  9. Gongadze, G.S., Pozdnemelovye ekhinoidei Gruzii i ikh stratigraficheskoe znachenie (Late Cretaceous Echinoids of Georgia and Their Stratigraphic Significance), Tbilisi: Tbil. Univ., 1979.

  10. Gosudarstvennaya geologicheskaya karta Rossiiskoi Federatsii M-38-XXXVI (Balakovo). Masshtab 1 : 200 000 (State Geological Map of the Russian Federation M-38-XXXVI (Balakovo), Scale 1 : 200 000), St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2001.

  11. Guzhikova, A.A. and Ben’yamovskii, V.N., The Campanian–Maastrichtian magnetostratigraphy of the Volga region (vicinity of Volsk town), Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2018, vol. 59, pp. 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagt, J.W.M., Late Cretaceous–Early Palaeogene echinoderms and the K/T boundary in the southeast Netherlands and northeast Belgium. Part 4: echinoids, Scr. Geol., 2000, no. 121, pp. 181–375.

  13. Jagt, J.W.M., van Bakel, B.W.M., Deckers, M.J.M., Donovan, S.K., Fraaije, R.H.B., Jagt-Yazykova, E.A., Laffineur, J., Nieuwenhuis, E., and Thijs, B., Late Cretaceous echinoderm ‘odds and ends’ from the Low Countries, Contemp. Trends Geosci., 2018, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalyakin, E.A., Morskie ezhi Micraster Tsentral’norusskoi paleobiogeograficheskoi provintsii (Echinoids Micraster of the Central Russian Paleobiogeographic Province), Trudy Vseross. Paleontol. Obshch., Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lambert, J., Description des Echinides cretaces de la Belgique. I. Etude monographique sur le genre Echinocorys, Mem. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg., 1903, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Melikov, O.G., Echinoids (Upper Cretaceous), in Melovaya fauna Azerbaidzhana (Cretaceous Fauna of Azerbaijan), Baku: Elm, 1988, pp. 187–213.

  17. Moskvin, M.M., Poslavskaya, N.A., and Shmidt, O.I., Class Echinoidea. Sea urchins, in Atlas rukovodyashchikh form iskopaemykh faun SSSR (Atlas of Guiding Forms of Fossil Faunas of the USSR), vol. 11: Verkhnii otdel melovoi sistemy (Upper Cretaceous), Moscow: Gos. Izd. Geol. Lit., 1949, pp. 97–130.

  18. Neumann, C. and Hampe, O., Eggs for breakfast? Analysis of a probable mosasaur biting trace on the Cretaceous echinoid Echinocorys ovata Leske, 1778, Fossil Record, 2018, vol. 21, pp. 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumann, C. and Wisshak, M., Gastropod parasitism on late cretaceous to early Paleocene holasteroid echinoids—evidence from Oichnus halo sp. n., Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., 2009, vol. 284, pp. 115–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neumann, C., Jagt, J.W.M., and van der Ham, R.W.J.M., Rare Campanian Echinoids from Höver and Misburg (Hannover Area, Lower Saxony, Germany), Mitt. Mus. Nat. kd. Berl., Geowiss. Reihe, 2002, vol. 5, pp. 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Olferiev, A.G., Beniamovskii, V.N., Ivanov, A.V., Ovechkina, M.N., Seltser, V.B., and Kharitonov, V.M., Upper Cretaceous deposits in the north of the Saratov oblast. Article 1. Section of the Bolshevik Quarry in the vicinity of Volsk, Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2009a, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olferiev, A.G., Beniamovskii, V.N., Ivanov, A.V., Ovechkina, M.N., Seltser, V.B., and Kharitonov, V.M., Upper Cretaceous deposits in the north of the Saratov oblast. Article 2. Biostratigraphic subdivision of the section of the Bolshevik Quarry in the vicinity of Volsk, Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 2009b, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olszewska-Nejbert, D., Late Cretaceous (Turonian–Coniacian) irregular echinoids of western Kazakhstan (Mangyshlak) and southern Poland (Opole), Acta Geol. Polon., 2007, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pasternak, S.I., Gavrilishin, V.I., Ginda, V.A., Kotsyubinskii, S.P., and Sen’kovskii, Yu.M., Stratigrafiya i fauna kreidovykh vikladiv zakhodu Ukraini (Stratigraphy and Fauna of Cretaceous Deposits of the West of Ukraine), Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1968.

  25. Pervushov E.M., Sel’tser V.B., Kalyakin E.A. Macrofaunal complex of the Campanian paleobasin of the Volsk Depression (north of the Saratov Volga region), in Materialy LXI sessii Paleontologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN “Sovremennye problemy paleontologii” (Proceedings of the LXI Session of the Paleontological Society under the Russian Academy of Sciences “Modern Problems of Paleontology”), St. Petersburg, 2015, pp. 84–86.

  26. Poslavskaya, N.A. and Moskvin, M.M., Echinoids, in Atlas verkhnemelovoi fauny Severnogo Kavkaza i Kryma (Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous Fauna of the Northern Caucasus and Crimea), Moscow: Gostoptekhizdat, 1959, pp. 237–304.

  27. Rukhadze, I., Upper Cretaceous echinoids of Georgia, Byull. Gos. Muz. Gruz., 1940, vol. X-A, pp. 81–184.

  28. Savchinskaya, O.V., Echinoids, in Atlas verkhnemelovoi fauny Donbassa (Atlas of Upper Cretaceous Fauna of Donbass), Moscow: Nedra, 1974, pp. 303–332.

  29. Savchinskaya, O.V., Class Echinoidea (sea urchins), in Atlas bespozvonochnykh pozdnemelovykh morei Prikaspiiskoi vpadiny (Atlas of Invertebrates of the Late Cretaceous Seas of the Caspian Basin), Trudy Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1982, vol. 187, pp. 229–240.

  30. Smiser, J.S., A revision of the echinoid genus Echinocorys in the Senonian of Belgium, Bull. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg., 1935, no. 67, pp. 1–51.

  31. Smith, A.B., Echinoid Palaeobiology, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, A.B. and Wright, C.W., British Cretaceous Echinoids, part 9: Atelostomata 2, Spatangoida (2), Monogr. Palaeontograph. Soc., London, 2012, vol. 166 (639), pp. 635–754.

  33. Stokes, R.B., Royaumes et provinces fauniques du crétacé établis sur la base d’une etude systematique du genera Micraster, Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., C: Sci. Terre, 1975, vol. XXXI.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stokes, R.B., The echinoids Micraster and Epiaster from the Turonian and Senonian of England, Paleontology, 1977, vol. 20, pp. 805–821.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wisshak, M. and Neumann, C., Asymbiotic association of a boring polychaete and an echinoid from the Late Cretaceous of Germany, Acta Palaeontol. Polon., 2006, no. 3, pp. 589–597.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I express my sincere gratitude to E.M. Pervushov and V.B. Seltser (SSU) for their assistance in field research and critical comments on the manuscript, I. Valashchik (Warsaw University) and D.A. Shelepov (SSU) for consultations in processing the material, and E.V. Popov (SSU) for assistance in preparing photographic materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Kalyakin.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by M. Batrukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalyakin, E.A. Traces of Sublethal Injuries in Upper Cretaceous Echinoid Tests from the Vicinity of Volsk (Lower Volga Region). Paleontol. J. 55, 1039–1048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030121090057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030121090057

Keywords:

Navigation