Skip to main content
Log in

The geothermal model of Mersin (Turkey) region

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to present the geothermal model of Mersin (Camili) region geothermal area with its geology, hydrogeology, hydrogeochemistry and isotope hydrology. The 1/25000 scale geology map obtained from the literature research is revised. In order to obtain a geothermal model, geological crosssections are extracted in certain points on the revised geology map. There are 3 hot water outlets. There are MC-1, C-1 and Uclu Cesme deep drillings. MC-1 well is 420 m, approximately 43.6°C temperature and 35 L/s flow rate and C-1 is 150 m, 40.3°C and 35 L/s. There is no exact information about the depth of Uclu Cesme well, but its average temperature is 37.5°C and it has a very low flow rate. Isotope analyses of the water samples obtained from these three wells and the Icme Dere are carried out by using the IRMS method with δ18O–δ2H (Deuterium) and IAEA method with 3H (Tritium). Radioactive Alpha-Beta determination and Physico-chemical and Bacteriological analyses of MC-1 well are made by using EPA 900.00. δ18O–δ2H isotope ratios clearly indicate a meteoric origin for the waters. In the light of all this information, the revised 1/25000 scare geology map of Mersin Guneyyolu (Camili) geothermal area is obtained; it is found out that hot waters are of meteoric origin; and the isotope hydrology and hydro-chemical assessment of the area is conducted to shape the geothermal model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. Craig, “Isotopic variations in meteoric waters,” Science, 13, 1702–1703(1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z. Demirel, “Accessible energy amount and the environmental pollution from a clean energy resource; a case study from Guneyyolu geothermal area, Turkey” in Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005 Antalya, Turkey, 2005 (Antalya, 2005), pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Durdu, Z. Arigun, H. Yildiz and S. Uslu, “MTA Camili MC-1 Kuyusu, Kuyu Bitirme Raporu” (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Senol, S. Sahin and T.Y. Duman, “Adana–Mersin dolayinin jeoloji etüd raporu”, (MTA, Ankara, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Tekin, I. Kara, and N. Yildirim, “Mersin Guneyyolu (Camili Köyü Içme Kaynagi) Jeotermal Enerji Aramasi Etüt Raporu”, (MTA Ankara, Aralik, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Uras.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uras, Y., Dag, M. The geothermal model of Mersin (Turkey) region. Geochem. Int. 54, 559–568 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702916060070

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702916060070

Keywords

Navigation