Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminant and factor analyses as tools for comparison of terrestrial and Venusian volcanic rocks

  • Published:
Geochemistry International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical methods of multi-dimensional analysis (discriminant functions and factor analysis) were applied to compare the chemical analyses obtained by Venera-13, -14, and Vega-2 landers (contents of major oxides except for sodium) with petrochemical data compiled into the data base on terrestrial ocean. It is shown that the distribution of major petrogenic elements in the terrestrial rocks ascribed to different geodynamic settings (spreading zones, hot spots, and subduction zones) is determined by crystallization differentiation. This process is best manifested in hot spot volcanics (volcanic islands). In spite of the difficulties related to the poor precision of chemical determinations of Venusian rocks, obtained data indicate that the rocks from the Venera-13 and Vega-2 landing sites have no petrochemical analogues among terrestrial oceanic volcanic rocks. Rocks analyzed in the Venera-14 landing site may resemble the mid-ocean ridge volcanic rocks, although geological setting in the Venera-14 landing site ellipse strongly differs from terrestrial spreading zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. M. Abdrakhimov, “Geochemical comparison of volcanic rocks from terrestrial intraplate oceanic hot spots with Venusian surface material,” Geochem. Int. 43 (8), 732–747 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • V. L. Barsukov, “Venusian igneous rocks,” in Venus Geology, Geochemistry, and Geophysics (Research Results from the USSR), Ed. by V. L. Barsukov, A. T. Basilevsky, V. P. Volkov, and V. N. Zharkov, (University of Arizona Press, Tucson–London, 1992), pp. 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. L. Barsukov, A. L. Sukhanov, A. L Akim, and 25 coauthors, “Geomorphological characteristics of the northern hemisphere of Venus,” Geotektonika, No. 4, pp. 4–25 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. V. Bondarenko, J. W. Head, and M. A. Ivanov, “Presentday volcanism on Venus: Evidence from microwave radiometry,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 L23202 (2010). doi:10.1029/2010GL045233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Chorowicz, “The East African rift system,” J. African Earth Sci. 43, 379–410 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Davis, Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (Wiley, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ebinger, P. Djomant, E. Mbede, A. Foster, and J. B. Dawson, “Rifting Archaean lithosphere: the Eyasi–Manyara–Natron rifts, East Africa,” J. Geol. Soc. 154, 947–960 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. A. Frey, M. O. Garcia, W. S. Wise, and A. Kenned, “The evolution of Mauna Kea volcano, Hawaii: petrogenesis of tholeiitic and alkali basalts,” J. Geophys. Res. 96 (B9), 14347–14375 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. O. Garcia, E. H. Haskins, E. M. Stolper, and M. Baker, “Stratigraphy of the Hawai’i Scientific Drilling Project core (HSDP2): anatomy of a Hawaiian shield volcano,” Geochem., Geophys., Geosyst. 8, (2007) doi:10.1029/2006GC001379

  • M. A. Ivanov and A. T. Basilevsky, “Density and morphology of impact craters on Tessera Terrain, Venus,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 20 (23), 2579–2582 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Ivanov and J. W. Head, “Global geological map of Venus,” Planet. Space Sci. 59 (13), 1559–1600 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Ivanov and J. W. Head, “The history of volcanism on Venus,” Planet. Space Sci. 84, 66–92 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Ivanov and J. W. Head, “The history of tectonism on Venus: a stratigraphic analysis,” Planet. Space Sci. (in press).

  • J. S. Kargel, G. Komatsu, V. R. Baker, and R. G. Strom, “The volcanology of Venera and VEGA landing sites and the geochemistry of Venus,” Icarus 103, 253–275 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Le Bas, R. W. Le Maitre, A. Streckeisen, and B. Zanettin, “A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali–silica diagram,” J. Petrol. 27, 745–750 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. B. McKinnon, K. J. Zahnle, B. A. Ivanov, and H. J. Melosh, “Cratering on Venus: models and observations,” in: Venus II Geology, Geophysics, Atmosphere, and Solar Wind Environment, Ed. by S. W. Bougher, D. M. Hunten, and R. J. Phillips (Univ. Arizona Press Tucson, 1997), pp. 969–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. V. Nikolaeva and A. A. Ariskin, “Geochemical constraints on petrogenic processes on Venus,” J. Geophys. Res. 104 (E8), 18889–18898 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. V. Nikolaeva, “K–U–Th systematics of igneous rocks for planetological comparisons: oceanic island-arc volcanics on Earth versus rocks on the surface of Venus,” Geochem. Int. 35, 424–447 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • O. V. Nikolaeva, “K–U–Th systematics of terrestrial magmatic rocks for planetary comparisons: terrestrial NMORBs and Venusian basaltic material,” Geochem. Int. 33, 1–11 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. T. Russell, L. Zhang, M. Delva, W. Magnes, R. J. Strangeway, and H. Y. Wei, “Lightning on Venus inferred from whistler-mode waves in the ionosphere,” Nature 450, 661–662 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. P. Ryan “The mechanics and three-dimensional internal structure of active magmatic systems’ Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii,” J. Geophys. Res. 93 (B5), 4213–4248 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. V. Shalygin, W. J. Markiewicz, A. T. Basilevsky, D. V. Titov, N. Ignatiev, and J. W. Head, “Bright transient spots in Ganiki Chasma, Venus,” Lunar. Planet. Sci. Conf. 45, 2556 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. C. Solomon, S. E. Smrekar, D. L. Bindschadler, R. E. Grimm, W. M. Kaula, G. E. McGill, R. J. Phillips, R. S. Saunders, G. Schubert, S. W. Squyres, and E. R. Stofan, “Venus tectonics: an overview of Magellan observations,” J. Geophys. Res. 97 (E8), 13199–13255 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Strom, G. G. Schaber, and D. D. Dawson, “The global resurfacing of Venus,” J. Geophys. Res. 99 (E5), 10899–10926 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. A. Surkov, Exploration of Terrestrial Planets from Spacecraft: Instrumentation, Investigation, Interpretation, 2nd ed., (Chichester–Wiley–Praxis Pub, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. I. Tilling and J. J. Dvorak, “Anatomy of a basaltic volcano,” Nature, 363, 125–133 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Treiman, “Geochemistry of Venus’ surface: current limitations as future opportunities,” in Exploring Venus as a Terrestrial Planet, Ed. by L. W. Esposito, E. R. Stofan, and T. E. Cravens, Am. Geophys. Union Monograph Ser. 176, (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Ivanov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.A. Ivanov, 2016, published in Geokhimiya, 2016, No. 1, pp. 56–77.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivanov, M.A. Discriminant and factor analyses as tools for comparison of terrestrial and Venusian volcanic rocks. Geochem. Int. 54, 48–67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702916010055

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016702916010055

Keywords

Navigation