Abstract
This paper is a continuation of our works [1, 2], in which we discussed some incorrect approaches to identifying large-scale types of solar wind and related incorrect conclusions drawn when analyzing the solar-terrestrial physics data. In this paper, we analyze the sets of CME-induced, CIR-induced, and multistep magnetic storms for the period of 1996–2004 from the list by Kataoka and Miyoshi [3]. It is shown that a significant number of the events in this list were identified incorrectly and that their interpretation differs, both from our catalog (Yermolaev et al. [4], ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni/) for the Sheath, ICME, and CIR and from the catalog by Richardson and Cane [5] for ICME. The use of the uncorrected list of Kataoka and Miyoshi leads to incorrect identification of the interplanetary drivers of magnetic storms and to erroneous conclusions, for example, in paper [6].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The appendix shows the results of the comparison of events from the works by Shen et al. [17] and Pandya et al. [18] with data from our catalog ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni/catalog/.
REFERENCES
Yermolaev, Yu.I., Lodkina, I.G., Nikolaeva, N.S., et al., Some problems of identifying types of large-scale solar wind and their role in the physics of the magnetosphere, Cosmic Res., 2017, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 178–189.
Lodkina, I.G., Yermolaev, Yu.I., Yermolaev, M.Yu., and Riazantseva, M.O., Some problems of identifying types of large-scale solar wind and their role in the physics of the magnetosphere: 2, Cosmic Res., 2018, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 331–342.
Kataoka, R. and Miyoshi, Y., Flux enhancement of radiation belt electrons during geomagnetic storms driven by coronal mass ejections and corotating interaction regions, Space Weather, 2006, vol. 4, S09004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005SW000211
Yermolaev, Yu. I., Nikolaeva, N.S., Lodkina, I.G., and Yermolaev, M.Yu., Catalog of large-scale solar wind phenomena during 1976–2000, Cosmic Res., 2009, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 81–94.
Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V., Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996–2009): Catalog and summary of properties, Sol. Phys., 2010, vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 189–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6
Ogawa, Y., Seki, K., Keika, K., and Ebihara, Y., Characteristics of CME- and CIR-driven ion upflows in the polar ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2019, vol. 124, pp. 3637–3649. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025870
Burton, R.K., McPherron, R.L., and Russell, C.T., An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst,J. Geophys. Res., 1975, vol. 80, pp. 4204–4214.
Yermolaev, Y.I., Lodkina, I.G., Nikolaeva, N.S., and Yermolaev, M.Y., Dynamics of large-scale solar wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2015, vol. 120, no. 9, pp. 7094–7106. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021274
Yermolaev, Y.I., Lodkina, I.G., Nikolaeva, N.S., et al., Statistic study of the geoeffectiveness of compression regions CIRs and sheaths, Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2018, vol. 180, pp. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.027
Boroyev, R.N. and Vasiliev, M.S., Substorm activity during the main phase of magnetic storms induced by the CIR and ICME events, Adv. Space Res., 2018, vol. 61, pp. 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2503109
Dremukhina, L.A., Lodkina, I.G., and Yermolaev, Yu.I., Relationship between the parameters of various solar wind types and geomagnetic activity indices, Cosmic Res., 2018, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952518060011
Despirak, I.V., Lyubchich, A.A., and Kleimenova, N.G., Solar wind streams of different types and high-latitude substorms, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2019, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219010055
Andreeva, V.A. and Tsyganenko, N.A., Empirical modeling of the geomagnetosphere for CIR and CME-driven magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2019, vol. 124, pp. 5641–5662. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026008
Hutchinson, J.A., Wright, D.M., and Milan, S.E., Geomagnetic storms over the last solar cycle: A superposed epoch analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 2011, vol. 116, A09211. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016463
Bingham, S.T., Mouikis, C.G., Kistler, L.M., et al., The outer radiation belt response to the storm time development of seed electrons and chorus wave activity during CME and CIR driven storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2018, vol. 123, pp. 10139–10157. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025963
Bingham, S.T., Mouikis, C.G., Kistler, L.M., et al., The storm-time development of source electrons and chorus wave activity during CME- and CIR-driven storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2019, vol. 124, pp. 5641–5662. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026689
Shen, X.-C., Hudson, M.K., Jaynes, A., et al., Statistical study of the storm time radiation belt evolution during Van Allen Probes era: CME-versus CIR-driven storms, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2017, vol. 122, pp. 8327–8339. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024100
Pandya, M., Veenadhar, B., Ebihara, Y., et al., Variation of radiation belt electron flux during CME and CIR driven geomagnetic storms: Van Allen Probes observations, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2019, vol. 124, pp. 6524–6540. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026771
Veselovsky, I.S., Panasyuk, M.I., Avdyushin, S.I., et al., Solar and heliospheric phenomena in October–November 2003: Causes and effects, Cosmic Res., 2004, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 433–488. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COSM.0000046229.24716.02
Yermolaev, Yu.I., Zelenyi, L.M., Zastenker, G.N., et al., A year later: Solar, heliospheric, and magnetospheric disturbances in November 2004, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2005, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 681–719.
Yermolaev, Y.I. and Yermolaev, M.Y., Comment on “Interplanetary origin of intense geomagnetic storms (Dst < –100 nT) during solar cycle 23 by WD Gonzalez et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 2008, vol. 35, no. 1, L01101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030281
King, J.H. and Papitashvili, N.E., Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data, J. Geophys. Res., 2004, vol. 110, no. A2, A02209. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010804
Nikolaeva, N.S., Yermolaev, Yu.I., and Lodkina, I.G., Modeling the time behavior of the Dst index during the main phase of magnetic storms generated by various types of solar wind, Cosmic Res., 2013, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952513060038
Nikolaeva, N.S., Yermolaev, Yu.I., and Lodkina, I.G., Modeling of the corrected Dst* index temporal profile on the main phase of the magnetic storms generated by different types of solar wind, Cosmic Res., 2015, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952515020070
Nikolaeva, N.S., Yermolaev, Yu.I., Lodkina, I.G., and Yermolaev, M.Yu., Does magnetic storm generation depend on the solar wind type?, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2017, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793217050152
Yermolaev, Y.I., Lodkina, I.G., Nikolaeva, N.S., and Yermolaev, M.Y., Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis: 2. Comparisons of CIR vs. Sheath and MC vs. Ejecta, Sol. Phys., 2016, vol. 292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1205-1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the developers of the OMNI database and Richardson and Cane’s ICME catalog for the opportunity to use the data. The OMNI data were obtained from the GSFC/SPDF OMNIWeb interface on the website http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov. The ICME catalog data were obtained from the site http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ ACE/ASC/DATA/level3/icmeTable2.htm/.
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 16-12-10062.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Translated by Yu. Preobrazhensky
APPLICATION
APPLICATION
As was noted in the Introduction, in the work by Pandya et al., it was indicated that the authors used in their work the results of identifying SW types in the list by Shen et al., which were criticized in our work [2]. In this Application, Table 7 presents the results of comparing the data of these two works with our catalog (ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni/). First of all, it is noteworthy that Pandya et al. added a significant number of events as compared to the list by Shen et al. Comparison with our catalog has shown that, in Table 7, of the 27 CME-induced magnetic storms, two events (numbers 3 and 8) related to Sheath, two events (19 and 26) related to CIR, and 23 events related to ICME. Twelve events, marked in Table 7 as т1 or т2, are contained in the tables of paper [17]. Of the 28 CIR-induced magnetic storms, two events (7 and 10) related to Sheath, two events (15 and 18) to ICME, four events (5, 11, 22, and 26) to undisturbed SW, and 21 events to CIR. Twelve events, marked in Table 7 as т2, are contained in Table 2 of the list by Shen et al.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lodkina, I.G., Yermolaev, Y.I., Yermolaev, M.Y. et al. Some Problems of Identifying Types of Large-Scale Solar Wind and Their Role in Magnetosphere Physics: 3. Use of Published Incorrect Data. Cosmic Res 58, 338–356 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001095252005007X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001095252005007X