Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of IFRS 8 on segment information quality in the European Union: a multi-dimensional analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide comprehensive evidence concerning the impact of IFRS 8 on the quality of segmental information disclosed in the annual reports of the largest companies in the European Union. We also assess the impact of using fifteen alternative proxies of segment information quality divided into four dimensions (extensiveness, fineness, variability, and consistency). The empirical results reveal that changes, and the strength of these changes, following IFRS 8 are dependent upon the proxy used. Our results have substantial implications for both policy makers and academic researchers, which are related to the impact of the principle-based IFRS 8 and the measurement of segment information quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It applies to financial years starting on or after January 1, 2009.

  2. The total number of missing observations is 12, of which six observations are missing. The remaining six observations are unavailable due to that two companies changed to multi and one firm changed to single after the adoption of IFRS 8.

  3. The Studies that have adopted both the weighted and unweighted indices found that the weighted indices generally did not capture any differences (Principe 2004; Robbins and Austin 1986; Adhikari and Tondkar 1992).

  4. These three items were excluded because they are not part of the secondary information and to use the score of SSQ to explain the impact of IFRS 8 on the quantity of secondary segment information given the heated debate on the impact of IFRS 8 on geographical disclosures.

  5. These differences explained by the samples composition. For example, the findings show that the level of consistency is 95% for German firms (not tabulated).

  6. The findings using non-parametric correlation matrix provide the same conclusions. In addition, the findings remain the same when we divide the sample into two periods (Pre and Post IFRS 8).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Hussainey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 1.

Table 1 Disclosure index

Appendix 2

See Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.

Table 2 Summary of segment information measurement
Table 3 Sample composition
Table 4 Sample distributions across years and country
Table 5 Impact of IFRS 8 on the volume of segment disclosure
Table 6 Analysis of geographical fineness reported in the segmental note under IAS14 and IFRS 8
Table 7 Analysis of geographical fineness reported in the segmental note under IAS14 and IFRS 8
Table 8 Analysis of cross segment variability in return under IAS14 and IFRS 8
Table 9 Analysis of segment information consistency under IAS14 and IFRS 8
Table 10 Pearson’s correlation between alternative proxies of each dimension of quality
Table 11 Frequency tables of the association between structure consistency and both geographical and business consistency
Table 12 Frequency tables of the association between geographical consistency and business consistency

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboud, A., Roberts, C. & Hussainey, K. The impact of IFRS 8 on segment information quality in the European Union: a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Discl Gov 16, 100–115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00059-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00059-9

Keywords

Navigation