Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disaggregation of the IT capital effects on firm performance: Empirical evidence from an IT asset portfolio perspective

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Although prior research has frequently focused on aggregate IT capital, most firms invest in specific types with different goals. Each type of capital represents a distinct factor of a firm’s production function. Drawing on a theory-of-production framework, we disaggregate overall IT capital into specific types to examine their unique effects on firm performance over time. We categorize these IT-specific production factors into a firm’s installed personal computers for individual information access, servers for collective information access, storage capacity for information stock, and nodes for information flow. We investigate when and how each IT capital type contributes to firm performance by analyzing the 5-year panel data of 1,548 US firms. Our findings show that individual information access capital and collective information access capital have immediate effects on profitability through cost efficiency or sales growth. By contrast, information stock capital has a lagged effect on profitability. In addition, information stock capital complements individual information access capital in improving profitability, as well as contributing to sales growth and cost efficiency equivalent to firm size. These results extend the existing research on firm-level effects of IT investments by demonstrating that different IT capital effects have unique ways of affecting firm performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida VAF and Menascé DA (2002) Capacity planning an essential tool for managing web services. IT Professional 4(4), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS and Tushman ML (2001) Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review 26(4), 645–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MC, Banker RD and Ravindran S (2003) The new productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM 46(3), 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral S, Brynjolfsson E and Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Information Systems Research 23(3–2), 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral S and Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science 18(5), 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Bardhan IR, Chang H and Lin S (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quarterly 30(2), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua A, Kriebel CH and Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research 6(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG and Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science 45(7), 1008–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP (1974) The measurement of technical change biases with many factors of production. American Economic Review 64(6), 964–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 339–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan TF and Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies ‘engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics 65(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SL and Eisenhardt KM (1998) Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM (1996) Paradox Lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science 42(4), 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM and Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 137–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E and Yang S (1996) Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers 43, 179–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman RA (2002) Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(2), 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones A and Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly 31(4), 657–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones A and Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research 24(3), 632–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones A and Straub DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research 17(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee D, Pacini C and Sambamurthy V (2002) The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2), 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen KCW and Lee CWJ (1995) Accounting measures of business performance and Tobin’s q theory. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 10(3), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL and Melville NP (2010) Research note: Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New Evidence and New Results. Information Systems Research 21(2), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark KB and Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb CW and Douglas PH (1928) A theory of production. American Economic Review 18(1), 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley KF and Pyburn PJ (1982) Intellectual technologies: The key to improving white-collar productivity. Sloan Management Review 24(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1990) The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review 80(2), 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCarolis DM and Deeds DL (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20(10), 953–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V and Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys 35(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan S and Min C (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Science 43(12), 1660–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I and Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12), 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong JQ and Yang C-H (2016) How information technology influences patenting innovation: A knowledge recombination perspective. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.

  • Douglas PH (1976) The Cobb–Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. Journal of Political Economy 84(5), 903–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM and Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21(1), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison M, Calinescu R and Paige R (2014) Re-Engineering the database layer of legacy applications for scalable cloud deployment. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing.

  • Forman C (2002) Switching costs, network effects, and networking equipment: Compatibility and vendor choice in the market for LAN equipment. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems.

  • Forman C, Goldfarb A and Greenstein S (2005) How do industry features influence the role of location on internet adoption? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(12), 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao G and Hitt LM (2012) Information technology and trademarks: Implications for product variety. Management Science 58(6), 1211–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadalupe M, Li H and Wulf J (2014) Who lives in the C-suite? organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Science 60(4), 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani V (1992) The demand for information technology capital: An empirical analysis. Decision Support Systems 8(5), 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani V and Whang S (1991) The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM 34(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte-Hanks (2006) Relational Database Format: A Guide to Using the CI Technology Database™ with Relational Database Software, Version 10, Harte-Hanks Market Intelligence, Inc.

  • Hayes DC, Hunton JE and Reck JL (2001) Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. Journal of Information Systems 15(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RH and Clark KB (1985) Explaining observed productivity differentials between plants: Implications for operations research. Interfaces 15(6), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Z-L and Wong P-K (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat CE (1997) Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal 18(5), 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt LM and Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20(2), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2(1), 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant K and Won Y (1999) Server capacity planning for web traffic workload. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(5), 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Cavusgil ST and Calantone RJ (2006) Information system innovations and supply chain management: Channel relationships and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV and Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Information Systems Research 23(1), 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulos K and de Ruyter K (2004) Knowledge stocks and information flows in new product development. Journal of Management Studies 41(8), 1469–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam SF and Chan KH (1987) Computer Capacity Planning: Theory and Practice. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie D (2006) Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review 31(1), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal DA and March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14(Winter Special), 95–112.

  • Levitt B and March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14(1), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin AY, Long CP and Carroll TN (1999) The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science 10(5), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Yates J and Benjamin RI (1989) The logic of electronic markets. Harvard Business Review 67(3), 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA (2003) Competitive dynamics and economic learning: An extended resource-based view. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(1), 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee AP (2002) The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management 11(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer K and Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28(2), 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas S, Krishnan MS and Fornell C (2005) Why Do Customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? Journal of Marketing 68(4), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas S, Ramasubbu N and Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I and Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly 36(1), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay T and Kekre S (2002) Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Science 48(10), 1301–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay T, Rajiv S and Srinivasan K (1997) Information technology impact on process output and quality. Management Science 43(12), 1645–1659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerkar A and Paruchuri S (2005) Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science 51(5), 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Yates JA, Okamura K and Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science 6(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poston RS and Grabski S (2001) Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2(4), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC and Dent-Micallef A (1997) Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal 18(5), 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai A, Patnayakuni R and Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM 40(7), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai A, Pavlou PA, Im G and Du S (2012) Interfirm IT capability profiles and communications for cocreating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quarterly 36(1), 233–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran T and Lertwongsatien C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(4), 237–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Muhanna WA and Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 29(4), 625–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Xue L, Gu B and Konana PC (2006) Asset characteristics and the impact of IT on firm scope and performance. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems.

  • Ross JW and Beath CM (2002) Beyond the business case: New approaches to IT investment. Sloan Management Review 43(2), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross JW and Weill P (2002) Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn’t make. Harvard Business Review 80(11), 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mercader J, Meroño-Cerdan AL and Sabater-Sánchez R (2006) Information technology and learning: Their relationship and impact on organisational performance in small businesses. International Journal of Information Management 26(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schryen G (2013) Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. European Journal of Information Systems 22(2), 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setia P, Venkatesh V and Joglekar S (2013) Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly 37(2), 565–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1987) We’d Better Watch Out. New York Times Book Review, p. 36, July 12.

  • Subramani MR and Walden E (2001) The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Information Systems Research 12(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambe P and Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Information Systems Research 23(3–1), 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan BCC, Pan SL and Hackney R (2010) The strategic implications of web technologies: A process model of how web technologies enhance organizational performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G and Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teigland R and Wasko MM (2003) Integrating knowledge through information trading: Examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance. Decision Sciences 34(2), 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich WM (2002) Legacy systems: Transformation strategies. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery SK, Droge C, Setia P and Sambamurthy V (2010) Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research 48(23), 7025–7042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MR and Hulland J (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (1997) Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Coopers & Lybrand, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research 3(4), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Ray G and Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Quarterly 36(2), 509–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Ray G and Zhao X (2017) Managerial incentives and IT strategic posture. Information Systems Research 28(1), 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahay D, Griffin A and Fredericks E (2004) Sources, uses, and forms of data in the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management 33(7), 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA and Nielsen AP (2002) Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal 23(5), 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K (2004) The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1), 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K and Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research 16(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, 632 Bogue Street, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Tae Hun Kim & Vallabh Sambamurthy

  2. College of Business, University of Michigan–Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, Dearborn, MI, 48126, USA

    Matt Wimble

Authors
  1. Tae Hun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matt Wimble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vallabh Sambamurthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Hun Kim.

Additional information

Editor: Dr. Frantz Rowe

Associate Editor: Dr. Jason Thatcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, T.H., Wimble, M. & Sambamurthy, V. Disaggregation of the IT capital effects on firm performance: Empirical evidence from an IT asset portfolio perspective. Eur J Inf Syst (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0062-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0062-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation