Abstract
Recently, scholars have examined the criminological implications of the growing trend of new urban design. Building on recent research (Cozens in Urban Policy Res 26(4):429–444, 2008) and past theoretical works (Brantingham and Brantingham in J Environ Psychol 13(1):3–28, 1993; Eur J Crim Policy Res 3(3):5–26, 1995), the current project suggests crime pattern theory requires new conceptual terms to understand and investigate the implications of crime clustering in new urban areas. It is argued in the current project that “edgeways”—or edges that become simultaneous paths—are prevalent in new urban space due to an array of combining features such as crowd generation, alleyways and parking difficulties, incomplete implementation of new urban principles, and the density paradox. The current paper entails a theoretical discussion of the problem and potential policy implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage, R. 2007. Sustainability versus safety, confusion, conflict and contradiction in designing out crime. In Imagination for crime prevention: Essays in honour of Ken Pease. Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 21, ed. G. Farrell, K.J. Bowers, S.D. Johnson, and M. Townsley. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Beavon, D.J., P.L. Brantingham, and P.J. Brantingham. 1994. The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. Crime Prevention Studies 2: 115–148.
Bernasco, W., and F. Luykx. 2003. Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. Criminology 41 (3): 981–1002.
Besel, K. and V. Andreescu. 2013. Back to the future: New urbanism and the rise of neotraditionalism in urban planning. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Block, R., and S. Davis. 1996. The environs of rapid transit stations: A focus for street crime or just another risky place. Crime Prevention Studies 6: 237–257.
Bohl, C. 2000. New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighbourhoods. Housing Policy Debate 11 (4): 761–797.
Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham (eds.). 1981. Environmental criminology, 27–54. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 1984. Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.
Brantingham, P.L., and P.J. Brantingham. 1993. Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13 (1): 3–28.
Brantingham, P.J., and P.L. Brantingham. 1995. Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 3 (3): 5–26.
Browning, C.R., R.A. Byron, C.A. Calder, et al. 2004. Concentration, and crime: Land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47 (3): 329–357.
Budd, T. 1999. Burglary of domestic dwellings: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 4/99. London: Home Office.
Calthorpe, P., and W. Fulton. 2001. The regional city. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.
Congress for New Urbanism (CNU). 1999. Charter of the new urbanism. 1st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Corradino Group, Inc. 2006. Original Highlands neighborhood plan: Final report. Prepared for Louisville Metro Department of Planning & Design Services.
Cozens, P.M. 2008. New urbanism, crime and the suburbs: A review of the evidence. Urban Policy and Research 26 (4): 429–444.
Davies, T., and S.D. Johnson. 2015. Examining the relationship between road structure and burglary risk via quantitative network analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31: 481–507.
Ellis, C. 2002. The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design 7 (3): 261–291.
Gallagher, L. 2013. The end of the suburbs: Where the American dream is moving. New York, NY: Penguin.
Guttery, R. 2002. The effects of subdivision design on housing values: The case of alleyways. Journal of Real Estate Research 23 (3): 265–273.
Harries, K.A. 1999. Mapping crime: Principle and practice (No. NCJ 178919). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Hirt, S. 2009. Premodern, modern, postmodern? Placing new urbanism into a historical perspective. Journal of Planning History 8 (3): 248–273.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of Great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Johnson, S.D., and K.J. Bowers. 2010. Permeability and burglary risk: Are cul-de-sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26: 89–111.
Johnson, S. and C. Loxley. 2001. Installing alley-gates: Practical lessons from burglary prevention projects, Home Office Briefing Note 2/01. London: Home Office.
Kitchen, T., and R.H. Schneider. 2007. Crime prevention and the built environment. London: Routledge.
Kurtz, E.M., B.A. Koons, and R.B. Taylor. 1998. Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks. Justice Quarterly 15: 121–149.
Lockwood, D. 2007. Mapping crime in Savannah social disadvantage, land use, and violent crimes reported to the police. Social Science Computer Review 25 (2): 194–209.
Lynch, K. 1960. The image of the city, vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Martin, M. 2001. The question of alleys, revisited. Urban Design International 6 (2): 76–92.
McCord, E.S., J.H. Ratcliffe, R.M. Garcia, et al. 2007. Nonresidential crime attractors and generators elevate perceived neighborhood crime and incivilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44 (3): 295–320.
Miethe, T.D., and D. McDowall. 1993. Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces 71: 741–759.
Muschamp, H. 1996. Can new urbanism find room for the old? New York Times 2: 27.
Newman, O. 1972. Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.
Papastergiadis, N., and H. Rogers. 1996. Parafunctional spaces. In Art and the city, ed. J. Stathatos. London: Academy Group.
Peeters, M., and H. Elffers. 2010. Do physical barriers affect urban crime trip? The effects of a highway, a railroad, a park, or a canal on the flow of crime in The Hague. Crime Patterns and Analysis 3: 38–49.
Phillips, E. 1996. Crime prevention through environmental design in the Bancroft neighborhood. Center for Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota. Neighborhood Planning for Community Revitalization, Minneapolis.
Reynald, D., M. Averdijk, H. Elffers, et al. 2008. Do social barriers affect urban crime trips? The effects of ethnic and economic neighbourhood compositions on the flow of crime in The Hague, The Netherlands. Built Environment 34: 21–31.
Smith, W.R., S.G. Frazee, and E.L. Davison. 2000. Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 38 (2): 489–524.
Southworth, M. 2003. New urbanism and the American metropolis. Built Environment 29 (3): 210–226.
Swope, R.E. 2001. Criminal theory on the street: Analyzing why offenses take place. Law and Order 49 (6): 121–128.
Talen, E. 2002. The social goals of new urbanism. Housing Policy Debate 13: 165–188.
Taylor, R.B. 1988. Human territorial functioning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, G.F. 1990. Neighbourhood permeability and burglary rates. Justice Quarterly 7: 57–67.
Wilcox Rountree, P.W., K.C. Land, and T.D. Miethe. 1994. Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: A hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology 32 (3): 387–414.
Wilcox, P., N. Quisenberry, D.T. Cabrera, et al. 2004. Busy places and broken windows? Toward defining the role of physical structure and process in community crime models. The Sociological Quarterly 45 (2): 185–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Higgins, E.M., Swartz, K. Edgeways as a theoretical extension: connecting crime pattern theory and New Urbanism. Crime Prev Community Saf 20, 1–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0021-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0021-8