Abstract
This article intervenes in a critical debate about the use of consent to distinguish sex from rape. Drawing from critical contract theories, it argues that sexual consent is a cruel optimism that often operates to facilitate, rather than alleviate, sexual violence. Sexual consent as a cruel optimism promises to simplify rape allegations in the popular cultural imagination, confounds the distinction between victims and agents of sexual violence, and establishes certainty for potential victimizers who rely on it to convince themselves and others that their partners implicitly or explicitly agreed to sex. In each of these cases, the power of consent rests in its tendency to obscure sexual violence in a set of questions around victimhood and agency, rather than to clarify whether or when it has occurred. Following in the critical contract tradition, this article argues that the optimistic attachment to the clarifying power of consent helps to explain the persistent commitment to better sexual consent as a ‘solution’ to the problems of rape and sexual violence, and that this ‘solution’ is insufficient to the task.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcoff, L.M. (2018) Rape and Resistance. Cambridge: Polity.
Beitsch, R. (2018) #MeToo movement has lawmakers talking about consent, Pew Trusts, 23 January, https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2018/01/23/metoo-movement-has-lawmakers-talking-about-consent.
Berlant, L. (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Blinder, A. (2018) U.S. Reopens Emmett Till Investigation, Almost 63 Years After His Murder, New York Times, accessed 12 July.
Bourke, J. (2007) Rape: Sex, Violence, History. London: Virago.
Bradley, L. (2015) Critics of Sansa’s rape scene on Game of Thrones are missing the point, Slate, 19 May, https://slate.com/culture/2015/05/the-rape-scene-on-sundays-game-of-thrones-was-necessary-and-sansa-deserves-more-credit.html.
Brodsky, A. (2017) Rape-adjacent: Imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 32(2): 183–210.
Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Fawcett Books.
Brundage, J. (1987) Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1992) Whose story is it, anyway?: Feminist and antiracist appropriations of Anita Hill. In T. Morrison (ed.) Race-ing Justice, En-gendering Power. New York: Pantheon, pp. 402–440.
Davis, A.Y. (1983) Women, Race and Class. New York: Vintage Books.
Davis, A.Y. (1990) Women, Culture and Politics. New York: Vintage Books.
D’Cruze, S. (2012) Sexual violence in history: A contemporary heritage. In J.M. Brown and S.L. Valklate (eds.) Handbook on Sexual Violence. New York: Routledge.
Donovan, K. and Brown, J. (2014) CBC fires Jian Ghomeshi over sex allegations, Toronto Star, 26 October.
Dworkin, A. (1987) Intercourse. New York: Basic Books.
Ferreday, D. (2015) Game of thrones, rape culture, and feminist fandom. Australian Feminist Studies 30(83): 21–36.
Fischel, J. and O’Connell, H. (2016) Disabling consent, or reconstructing sexual autonomy. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 30(2): 428–528.
Freedman, E. (2013) Redefining Rape: Sexual Violence in the Era of Suffrage and Segregation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haag, P. (1999) Consent: Sexual Rights and the Transformation of American Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harris-Perry, M. (2011) Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jones, R. (2016) Young men, get a “yes” text before sex CNN, 26 November 2013, http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/26/opinion/jones-sex-consent-texting/, accessed 15 March 2016.
Keating, C. (2011) Decolonizing Democracy: Transforming the Social Contract in India. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Laiou, A.E. (ed.) (1993) Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
MacKinnon, C. (1987) Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, C. (2016) Rape redefined. Harvard Law and Policy Review, 10, 431–477.
MacKinnon, C. (2005) Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Manne, K. (2018) Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marcotte, A. (2015) For Once, Game of Thrones treats rape with the gravity it deserves, Slate, 18 May. https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/05/another-major-character-is-raped-on-game-of-thrones-this-time-it-works-for-the-story.html.
Marcus, S. (1992) Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In J. Butler and J. Scott (eds.) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge, pp. 385–403.
Mardorossian, C. (2014) Framing the Rape Victim: Gender and Agency Reconsidered. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Martin, D. (2014) Breaking Down Jaime and Cersi’s controversial scene with last night’s Game of Thrones Director, Vulture, 21 April. https://www.vulture.com/2014/04/game-of-thrones-director-on-the-rape-sex-scene.html.
Mills, C. (1997) The Racial Contract. London: Cornell University Press.
Mills, C. (2017) Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
North Carolina State Legislature. (2019) SB 563. https://www.ncleg.gov/BillLookUp/2019/S563.
Pateman, C. (1980) Women and consent. Political Theory 8(2): 149–168.
Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Petrilla, M. (2015) Can an app help reduce sexual assault on college campuses? Fortune, 1 September, http://fortune.com/2015/09/01/affirmative-consent-app/.
Phillips, A. (2013) Our Bodies: Whose Property?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pitkin, H. (1965) Obligation and consent—I. American Political Science Review 59(4): 990–999.
Richie, B. (2012) Arrested Justice: Black Women, Violence, and America’s Prison Nation. NewYork: New York University Press.
Shanks, T. (2015) Affect, critique, and the social contract. Theory and Event 18(1): 1–15.
Silman, A. (2015) “Game of Thrones” stars defend disturbing sex scene: “It wasn’t rape,” Salon. 8 April https://www.salon.com/2015/04/07/game_of_thrones_stars_defend_cersei_and_jaimes_disturbing_sex_scene_it_wasnt_rape/.
Simplican, S.C. (2015) The Capacity Contract: Intellectual Disability and the Question of Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stewart, E. (2019) Sen. Martha McSally coming forward about her rape could be a watershed moment for Republican women, Vox, 7March https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/3/7/18254575/martha-mcsally-raped-arizona-senator-republican.
Tumulty, K. (2019) Sen. Martha McSally’s #MeToo rape revelation took guts—maybe as much as her actions in uniform, Seattle Times, 6 March, https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/sen-martha-mcsallys-metoo-rape-revelation-took-guts-maybe-as-much-as-her-actions-in-uniform/.
Zarya, V. (2018) Is Blockchain the answer to consensual sex? Fortune, 16 January https://fortune.com/2018/01/16/consent-app-me-too/.
Acknowledgements
Although many friends and colleagues have contributed to my thinking on this piece, I want to extend special thanks to the colleagues who gave very particular and detailed feedback on drafts of this article: Vicki Hsueh, Shirin Deylami, Michaele Ferguson, Paul Apostolidis, Farhana Loonat, Jamie Mayerfeld, Gregg Miller, Jeanne Morefield, Mara Marin, Heather Pincock, Joel Schlosser, Tiffany MacBain, and Alison Tracy Hale. I also extend gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers and the editors of CPT who offered such careful and generative recommendations for revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kessel, A. The cruel optimism of sexual consent. Contemp Polit Theory 19, 359–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00362-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00362-8