Skip to main content
Log in

Journalism after Trump

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cultural Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2016 Presidential Election has precipitated a significant crisis in the world of journalism, prompting journalists and media critics to consider the shifts that have taken place in the media ecosystem. Journalists have had to narrate their sense of failure in order to understand it, and to integrate it within their larger worldview and their normative professional commitments. They have had to think about why they failed to see the Alt-Right as an independent and alternative public sphere. They have had to think about how the new media environment has challenged the taken-for-granted epistemological privileges of traditional journalism. They have had to confront the rise of populist discourse, and consider how it challenges journalists’ authority by equating them with elites. In their self-reflection after the election, journalists have sought to update the sacred discourse of journalism and to justify their central position in a democratic society. In order to do this, they have mobilized around a new battle narrative, which foregrounds the collective memory of Watergate and encourages a reconsideration of alliances that might be formed with new media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In order to collect data on how journalists and media experts interpreted and evaluated journalists’ performance during the 2016 US Presidential election, I searched the leading publications from legacy media (New York Times, Washington Post, CNN), new digital journalism sites (Huffington Post, Salon.com), and academic publications devoted to journalism (Columbia Journalism Review), between the dates of November 9, 2016 and January 10, 2017. In total, I was able to collect 117 articles.

  2. See, for example, Fineman (2016).

  3. This is an interpretation that David Axelrod (the political analyst and former adviser to Barack Obama) has made on his podcast, The Axe Files with David Axelrod.

  4. See, for example, Jost (2016).

  5. “Against Donald Trump”, The Atlantic, November 2016. Accessed at http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/11/the-case-for-hillary-clinton-and-against-donald-trump/501161/.

  6. The theory of the high-mimetic hero is drawn from Frye (1957), and has been used in the cultural sociological work of Jacobs (2000) and Smith (2005).

  7. See, for example, Thompson (2016).

  8. See Rosenstiehl (2016).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Eleanor Townsley, Jeff Alexander, Patricia Banks, Lina Rincon, Nickie Michaud Wild, Amy Schalet, Shai Dromi, Eric Malczewski, Patricia Banks, Tim Malacarne, Robert Zussman, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on previous drafts of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald N. Jacobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, R.N. Journalism after Trump. Am J Cult Sociol 5, 409–425 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0044-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0044-8

Keywords

Navigation