Skip to main content
Log in

The controversial impact of pedestrian guardrails on road crossing behaviours. Evidence from Hong Kong

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pedestrian guardrails (PGs) are common in high-density cities, but growing debate focuses on whether PGs provide pedestrian comfort and assure safety. The quasi-experimental condition, created by 2019–2020 Hong Kong protesters dismantling PGs the government later restored, allowed for a longitudinal study of how PGs impact pedestrian crossing behaviours at the intersection of Mong Kok Road and Sai Yeung Choi Street South. 6762 pedestrian behaviours were collected through video recording from periods before and after PG restoration; psychological factors linked to crossing behaviour were further investigated through a questionnaire. Per observations, crossing through the shortest route comprised most (25.24%) aberrant behaviours. PG restoration significantly reduced low-risk crossings but increased high-risk behaviours. Specifically, people aged 65+ were more likely to cross the road aberrantly to avoid grade-separated pedestrian crossings. The questionnaire results (N = 205) suggest pedestrians feel ambivalent about PGs. Taking shortcuts was the main reason for pedestrian misbehaviour (85.8% agreement rate). Additionally, pedestrians relied more on internal judgements of traffic situations than on external controls. Noticeably, PGs provided feelings of safety, despite not being designed to protect pedestrians from straying vehicles. These findings could inform designs for safe, comfortable pedestrian environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Adapted from HKSAR Lands Department document

Fig. 3

Source Authors

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to all the anonymous survey participants for their time and information, the anonymous reviewers for their critical feedback and the URBAN DESIGN International Editorial Team for their precious input. The authors highly value the careful review and the high-quality editing process; they acknowledge Weike Li, Lynn Yan Yung, Lok Yi Chui, Wing Chi Tsang and Tsz Chun Lau for their assistance in data collection.

Funding

The work described in this article was supported by a Grant from the City University of Hong Kong (Project No. 7005771).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Talamini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 76 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talamini, G., Shao, D., Chow, A.H.F. et al. The controversial impact of pedestrian guardrails on road crossing behaviours. Evidence from Hong Kong. Urban Des Int 27, 156–172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00184-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00184-y

Keywords

Navigation