Skip to main content
Log in

Death-bound subjectivity: Fanon’s zone of nonbeing and the Lacanian death drive

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is there a distinctive form of political agency that emerges from the conditions of ‘death-bound subjectivity’? Fanon’s idea of the zone of nonbeing suggests that this is indeed the case. Yet there is an omission in the secondary literature on Fanon in this respect. While a renowned Fanon scholar like Lewis Gordon usefully explores how the zone can be understood as domain of ontological erasure, he typically fails to elaborate on the revolutionary potential of the concept. The nature of the psychical processes underlying this passage to revolutionary agency remains unclear. Of such agency we might ask: what is the animating factor that underlies, that drives the passionate attachment to such death-bound causes? Lacan’s reconceptualization of the death drive as ethical cause—which, to be sure, represents a dramatic departure from the original Freudian conceptualization of a ‘death instinct’—is presented here as a useful auxiliary concept to Fanon’s zone of nonbeing. With speculative reference to the ethical dimension of the Lacanian death drive as a mode of surplus life which both underlies an unceasing fidelity to a cause and delivers the subject to a zone between life and death, we are able to offer an account of the agency of radical negativity that the zone of nonbeing engenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This, I hasten to add, is not necessarily meant as a critical remark. The political value of many of Fanon’s most innovative concepts—such as his idea of epidermalization to cite but one salient example—is that they open up and encourage radical perspectives, allowing new types of criticality to come into being.

  2. One key conflict here is that between generally phenomenological-existential readings of Fanon’s notion of the zone of nonbeing [such as those propounded by Bernasconi (2018), Gordon (2015) and Webber (2013)] and extrapolations of the same concept developed by Afro-pessimists such as Hartman (1997), Sexton (2011, 2015) and Wilderson (2010, 2020). The latter theorists equate blackness with social death, insisting that the historical institution of slavery has set the paradigm—epistemically, socially, politically—for how blackness and, indeed, black subjects are to be understood, valued and treated (that is, outside the category of the human). Antiblackness is not, moreover, a temporary historical aberration for afro-pessimist theorists; it is epistemically, libidinally, socially, constitutive of the category of the human as we know it. In arguing that blackness and the history of slavery cannot be separated and, advancing—as Hartman (1997), Sexton (2015) and Wilderson (2020) do—that black life is effectively lived as social death, Afro-pessimists run the risk—at least in the eyes of Gordon (2018) and Zalloua (2020)—of ontologizing racism and—we might add—of ontologizing the very notion of the zone of nonbeing. For two excellent recent articles detailing the terms of the above debate, see Ahmed (2018) and Olaloku-Teriba (2018). An additional critique of the Afro-pessimist position—instructive given the argument I will go on to make in this paper—comes from Neil Roberts (2016) who argues that we should “reject the mistaken [Afro-pessimist] conflation of the idea of social death with Fanon’s radical notion of the zone of nonbeing” because it is precisely “existence within…[the] hellishness [of the zone of nonbeing which]… creates the conditions for a salient, genuine upheaval”.

  3. More specifically, in reference to Sartre, and as part of an extended critique of the phenomenological-existential orientation of Lewis Gordon, Marriott (2011) observes that “Fanon identifies in the subject a void-like nothingness-of-being which is….linked to the problem of self-deception in Sartre” (p. 46). This link allows Fanon “to develop thoughts on how the black subject is always belated and dispersed…irrealized and yet forever haunted by its non-appearance and who can only acquire a certain density of being by taking on the tragic neurotic role (of an imaginary whiteness)—which is also why phenomenology can never be grounded in the experience of this subject for its truth is literally void” (p. 46).

  4. I am not the first to investigate how the Lacanian death drive might inform a conceptualization of the agency of politically marginal figures. Edelman’s (2004) No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive, while adopting a very different approach to my own, is the foremost example of such an initiative.

  5. It is for this reason that we find in Lacan’s (1981) Seminar XI (The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis) the idea that the end of an analysis corresponds to a transition from being a subject of desire to a subject of the drive.

  6. I am indebted to David Marriott for this formulation. Azeen Khan’s (2018) essay ‘Lacan and Race’ offers an instructive contrary argument.

  7. This, obviously, is my own interpretation of Lacan’s concerns in his seventh seminar, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. It is an interpretation which may well be faulted for retrospectively overlaying Lacan’s subsequent theorizations in his eleventh seminar, Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, upon this earlier work. For more exhaustive accounts of The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, see De Kessel (2009), Neill (2011) and Zupancic (2012).

  8. Marriott (2011) makes a similar point, albeit in a different context, when he maintains that for Fanon “the language of neurosis…[is] never simply secondary to ‘the language of political experience’ (p. 39).

References

  • Ahmed, A.K. 2018. Human Rights and the Non-human Black Body. International Journal of Human Rights 15 (28): 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S.B., and W.W. Nichols. 1971. Violence in Afro-American Fiction: An Hypothesis. Modern Fiction Studies 17 (2): 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi, R. 2018. Existentialism against Colonialism: Frantz Fanon’s Dialectic of Freedom. Talk given at Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, 8th September as part of the colloquium Fanon, Philosophy and Psychology: A Conversation.

  • Biko, S. 1978. I Write What I Like. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccariello-Maher, G. 2010. Jumpstarting the Decolonial Engine: Symbolic Violence from Fanon to Chávez. Theory & Event 13 (1): 377395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccariello-Maher, G. 2014. Decolonial Realism: Ethics, Politics and Dialectics in Fanon and Dussel. Contemporary Political Theory 13 (1): 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.R. 2002. (Love is) the Ability of Not Knowing: Feminist Experience of the Impossible in Ethical Singularity. Hypatia 17 (2): 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, S. 2015. Death Drive. https://www.actforlibraries.org/death-drive/. Accessed 18 Aug 2019.

  • De Kessel, M. 2009. Eros and Ethics: Reading Jacques Lacan’s Seminar VII. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. 1952/1967. Black Skin, White Masks (translated by Charles Lam Markmann). New York: Grove Press.

  • Fanon, F. 1952/2008. Black Skin, White Masks (translated by Richard Philcox). New York: Grove Press.

  • Fanon, F. 1956/1967. Towards the African Revolution. New York: Grove.

  • Fanon, F. 1961/1990. The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.

  • Freud, S. 1920. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Standard Edition, vol. 18, 1–64. London: Hogarth.

  • Gibson, N.C. 2015. Romanticism Reconsidered: Fanon, Reciprocity and Revolution (on Fanon’s Ninetieth Birthday). Acta Academica 47 (2): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.R. 2005. Through the Zone of Nonbeing: A reading of Black Skin, White Masks in Celebration of Fanon’s Eightieth Birthday. The C.L.R. James Journal 11 (1): 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.R. 2007. Through the Hellish Zone of Nonbeing: Thinking through Fanon, Disaster and the Damned of the Earth. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 5 (3): 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.R. 2008. A phenomenology of biko’s black consciousness. In Biko Lives! Contesting the Legacies of Steve Biko, ed. A. Mngxitama, A. Alexander, and N.C. Gibson, 83–94. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.R. 2015. What Fanon Said: A Philosophical Introduction to his Life and Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. 2018. Critical Reflections on Afro-Pessimism. The Brotherwise Dispatch, 3 (3).

  • Hartman, S. 1997. Scenes of Subject: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, P. 2006. Africana Phenomenology: Its Philosophical Implications. Worlds & Knowledge and Otherwise 1–23.

  • Hook, D. 2016. Of Symbolic Mortification and ‘Undead’ Life: Slavoj Žižek on the Death Drive. Psychoanalysis & History 18 (2): 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, D. 2020. Fanon with Lacan: Decolonialization by psychoanalytic means…? Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 51 (4): 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, D. in press. Fanon/Lacan: Points of Intersection. Psychoanalysis & History.

  • JanMohamed, A. 2005. The Death-Bound-Subject: Richard Wright’s Archaeology of Death. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. 2018. Lacan and race. In After Lacan: Literature, Theory, & Psychoanalysis in the Twenty-First Century, ed. A. Mukherjee, 148–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. 1981. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. 1992. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–1960. London: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. 2006. The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In Écrits the First Complete Edition in English, 197–268. New York & London: W.W Norton.

  • Maldondo-Torres, N. 2007. On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, D. 2011. Whither Fanon? Textual Practice 25 (11): 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. 2019. Necropolitics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, C. 2011. Lacanian Ethics and the Assumption of Subjectivity. London and New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaloku-Teriba, A. 2018. Afro-Pessimism and the (un)Logic of Anti-Blackness. Historical Materialism 26 (2): 96–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. 2015. Freedom as Marronage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N. 2016. On Freedom and Radicalizing the Black Radical Tradition. Black Perspectives. https://www.aaihs.org/on-freedom-and-radicalizing-the-black-radical-tradition/.

  • Roudinesco, E. 1997. Jacques Lacan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruti, M. 2012. The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft, C. 1973. A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1979. Orientalism. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, J. 2011. The Social Life of Social Death: On Afro-Pessimism and Black Optimism. InTensions 5: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, J. 2015. Unbearable Blackness. Cultural Critique 90 (1): 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sithole, T. 2016. The Concept of the Black Subject in Fanon. Journal of Black Studies 47 (1): 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez-Krabbe, J. 2012. Identity and the Preservation of Being. Social Identities 18 (3): 335–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thame, M. 2011. Reading Violence and Postcolonial Decolonization through Fanon: The Case of Jamaica. Journal of Pan-African Studies 4 (7): 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, N. 2013. Subjective Elasticity, the “Zone of Nonbeing” and Fanon’s New Humanism in Black Skin White Masks. Postcolonial Text 7 (4): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilderson, F.B. 2010. Red, White and Black: Cinema and the Structure of US Antagonisms. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilderson, F.B. 2020. Afro-Pessimism. London & New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. 2011. Steve Biko. Auckland Park: Jacana Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. 1978. Biko. London: Paddington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalloua, Z. 2020. Žižek on Race. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziarek, E.P. 2001. Rethinking Dispossession: On Being in One’s Skin. Parallax 7 (2): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziarek, E.P. 2004. Kristeva and Fanon: The Future of the Revolt or the Future of an Illusion? The Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (1): 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 1999. There is no sexual relationship. In The Žižek Reader, ed. E. Elizabeth Wright and E. Wright, 174–205. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 2002. For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 2004. From purification to subtraction: Badiou and the real. In Think Again: Alan Badiou and the Future of Philosophy, ed. P. Hallward, 165–181. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 2006. The Parallax View. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupancic, A. 2012. The Ethics of the Real. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupancic, A. 2017. What is Sex? Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Hook.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hook, D. Death-bound subjectivity: Fanon’s zone of nonbeing and the Lacanian death drive. Subjectivity 13, 355–375 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-020-00109-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-020-00109-6

Keywords

Navigation