[…] the world of the symbolic is the world of the machine
(Lacan, The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis).
Abstract
The concept of the subject relies on humanist presuppositions. Regardless of whether purported to be decentred and posthumanist, the subject conceived in poststructuralist and philosophical terms remains anthropocentric and anthropomorphic. There is something irrecuperably Cartesian in the poststructuralist idea of the subject. Physicality, both bodily and that of the materiality of the machinic prosthesis, is barred from the constitution of the Self, as the real is barred but also foreclosed to it. The subject, therefore, is yet another philosophical phantasm, which in its material actuality is determined as an instance of the signifying automaton. I argue that the “posthumanist” self, if conceived in Marxian and non-philosophical terms, ought to be viewed as the radical dyad of the signifying automaton and the real. It renders Haraway’s notion of the Cyborg more radical and unravels its inhumanity rather than posthumanity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. London: Sage Publications.
Braidotti, R. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fuller, M. 2007. Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Galloway, A. 2014. Laruelle: Against the Digital. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. 1985. Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.
Haraway, D. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century”, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181. London and New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 2016. Tentacular Thinking: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, and Chtulucene. e-flux. 75. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/75/67125/tentacular-thinking-anthropocene-capitalocene-chthulucene/. Accessed June 2017.
Irigaray, L. 1985. This Sex Which is Not One. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Kolozova, K. 2014. Cut of the Real: Subjectivity in Poststructuralist Philosophy. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Kolozova, K. 2018. The Inhuman. In The Posthuman Glossary, ed. R. Braidotti and M. Hlavajova, 199–201. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kolozova, K., and Ž. Trajanoski (eds.). 2002. Conversations with Judith Butler. Skopje: EvroBalkan Press.
Lacan, J. 1998. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. J.-A. Miller (trans: Sheridan, A.). New York/London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Laruelle, F. 1989. Philosophie et non-philosophie. Liège/Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
Laruelle, F. 2010. Future Christ: A Lesson in Heresy. (trans: A. P. Smith.). London: Continuum.
Löffler, D. 2017. Rekursion zivilisatorischer Kapazitäten als Entwicklungsmuster in der Zivilisationsgeschichte. Doctoral Dissertation defended at Freie Universität in Berlin.
Löffler, D. 2018. Distributing Potentiality. Post-capitalist Economies and the Generative Time Regime Distributing Potentiality. Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 15 (1–2): 8–45.
Marx, K. 1887. Capital: Volume I. Translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, edited by Frederick Engels, from the online version of the Marxist Internet Archive (1995; 1999). https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/, Accessed June 2017.
Marx, K. 1894. Capital Vol. III. Edited by Frederick Engels, from the online version of the Marxist Internet Archive (1996; 1999). https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/. Accessed June 2017.
Marx, K. 1932. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts 1844, from the online version of the Marxist Internet Archive (2000; 2007). https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Economic-Philosophic-Manuscripts-1844.pdf. Accessed June 2017.
Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse: Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy. (trans: M. Nicolaus). New York: Penguin Books.
Meillassoux, M. 2008. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. (trans: French by R. Brassier.). London: Bloomsbury.
Ó Maoilearca, J. 2015. All Thoughts Are Equal: Laruelle and Nonhuman Philosophy. (Posthumanities). Univ Of Minnesota Press.
Power, N. 2007. Philosophy’s Subjects. Parrhesia 3: 55–72.
Sohn-Rethel, A. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labor: Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan.
Turing, A. 1946. Proposal for Development in the Mathematics Division of an Automatic Computing Engine (ACE). In 1986. A.M. Turing’s ACE Report of 1946 and Other Papers, ed. B.E. Carpenter and R.W. Doran. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Turing, A. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59: 433–446.
Van der Tuin, I. 2014. Generational Feminism: New Materialist Introduction to a Generative Approach. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books, Rowman and Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kolozova, K. Subjectivity without physicality: machine, body and the signifying automaton. Subjectivity 12, 49–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0056-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0056-z