Abstract
The United States is no stranger to “public diplomacy” efforts to serve its strategic interests and project its image and values in times of conflict or strife, though generally these recede. Yet the country now faces serious deterioration in its national standing, suggesting a need for new strategies. This paper surveys the differing approaches made by Germany with its Goethe Institut and China with its Confucius Institute as potential models for the United States. Based on these experiences, the paper advances the argument that as a matter of public policy, the U.S. should establish its own institute drawing on these successful “soft-power” models to market the nation’s distinct culture, its unique take on the English language, its suitability for investment, travel, and tourism, and promotion of its national brand image.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anholt, S. 2009. Branding places and nations. In Brands and branding, ed. R. Clifton and S. Ahmad, 206–216. London: Economist Books.
Cabestan, J.-P. 2008. Learning from the EU?: China’s changing outlook toward multilateralism. In China and the new international order, ed. G. Wang and Y. Zeng, 203–217. New York: Routledge.
Chew, Grace. 2007. The Confucius Institute in the world: an overview. CHC Bulletin, Vol. 9, 13–19. Singapore: Chinese Heritage Centre.
Congressional Research Service. 2011. Federal Government Corporations: An overview. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30365.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
Deutscher Bundestag - Wissenschaftliche Dienste. 2006. Das Goethe-Institut. Institutionelle Strukturen und Einbindung in das System der Auswärtigen Kulturpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. [The Goethe Institute: International Structures and Incorporation into the System of Foreign Culture Politics in the Federal Republic of Germany.].
Dinnie, K. 2015. Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, and Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Economist. 2015. Sprechen sie power? Once the language of Schiller and Goethe, then of Hitler, German is hip again, 3 September. https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21663257-once-language-schiller-and-goethe-then-hitler-german-hip-again-sprechen-sie-power. Accessed 12 Feb 2018.
Economist. 2017. Buying love, 23 March. https://www.economist.com/news/china/21719508-can-money-buy-sort-thing-china-spending-billions-make-world-love-it. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
Epstein, E. 2018. How China infiltrated U.S. classrooms. Politico, 16 January. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/16/how-china-infiltrated-us-classrooms-216327. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
The Federal Republic of Germany. 1985. Foreign cultural policy. Munich: In Facts About Germany.
Fialho, L.P. 2013. The US State Department’s American spaces program: Fact sheet. American Security Project. https://www.americansecurityproject.org/ASP%20Reports/Ref%200117%20-%20The%20US%20State%20Department’s%20American%20Spaces%20Programs.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
Global Firepower.com. 2018. Global military strength ranking. https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.
Goethe Institut. n.d. Foreign cultural policy: The third pillar of diplomacy. Munich: Goethe Institut. https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/ges/20723017.html. Accessed 12 May 2018.
Goethe Institut. 2017. Jahrbuch annual report, 2016-2017. München: Goethe-Institut.
Gray, A. 2017. The 10 largest economies in 2017. Cologny: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/03/worlds-biggest-economies-in-2017/. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.
Guttenplan, D. 2012. Critics worry about influence of Chinese institutes on U.S. campuses. New York Times, 3 March. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/us/critics-worry-about-influence-of-chinese-institutes-on-us-campuses.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2018.
Hartig, F. 2016. Chinese public diplomacy: The rise of the Confucius Institute. New York: Routledge.
Hartig, F. 2014. The globalization of Chinese soft power: Confucius Institutes in South Africa. Los Angeles: USC Center on Public Diplomacy, Figueroa Press.
Hubert, J. 2014. Authenticating the Nation: Confucius institutes and soft power. Los Angeles: USC Center on Public Diplomacy, Figueroa Press.
Ickes, L.R. 2005. Public Broadcasting in America. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Kathe, S.R. 2005. Kulturpolitik um Jeden Preis: Die geschichte des Goethe Instituts von 1951 bis 1990. [Cultural policy at any cost: A history of the Goethe Institute, 1951-1990.]. München: Martin Meidenbauer Verlag
Kempe, F. 1999. A personal search for the New Germany—Father/land. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Lanshina, T. 2015. The Goethe Institute and soft power. International Organisations Research Journal 10 (1): 86–104.
Nye, J.S. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, J.S. 2010. Global power shifts. TED talk. http://www.ted.com/talks/joseph_nye_on_global_power_shifts. Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
Pamment, J. 2014. Strategic narratives in US public diplomacy: a critical geopolitics. Popular Communication 12 (1): 48–64.
Pew Research Center. 2017. U.S. image suffers as publics around world question Trump’s leadership; America still wins praise for its people, culture and civil liberties. http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/06/26/u-s-image-suffers-as-publics-around-world-question-trumps-leadership/. Accessed 2 Feb 2018.
Pew Research Center. 2018. America’s international image continues to suffer. http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/10/01/americas-international-image-continues-to-suffer/. Accessed 23 Jan 2019.
Place Brand Observer. 2018. Country brands: 2017—Anholt-GfK Roper Nation Brands study reveals winners, losers, and trends. https://placebrandobserver.com/anholt-gfk-nation-brands-index-2017-highlights/. Accessed 4 Apr 2018.
Portland/USC Center on Public Diplomacy. 2019. The soft power 30: A global ranking of soft power. https://softpower30.com/country/united-states/. Accessed 23 January 2019.
Schneider, C.P. 2009. The unrealized potential of cultural diplomacy. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 39 (4): 260–279.
Snow, N. 2010. Propaganda Inc: Selling America’s Culture to the World. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Starr, D. 2009. Chinese language education in Europe: The Confucius Institutes. European Journal of Education 44 (1): 65–82.
Statistics Times. 2018. List of countries by projected GDP, 9 June 2018. http://statisticstimes.com/economy/countries-by-projected-gdp.php.
US Department of State. 2017. Office of American spaces: 2016 annual report. https://americanspaces.state.gov/home/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Office-of-American-Spaces-FINAL.pdf.
US Department of State. 2018. Office of American spaces: 2017 annual report. https://app.box.com/s/s2202z80ga37wsp6iuue9ic7loqg0m5a.
US News and World Report. 2018. Switzerland is the best country in the world, says 2018 best countries report, 23 January. https://www.usnews.com/info/blogs/press-room/articles/2018-01-23/switzerland-is-the-best-country-in-the-world-says-2018-best-countries-report. Accessed 20 Apr 2018.
Waller, J.M. 2005. The American Way of Propaganda: Lessons from the founding fathers. White paper No. 1, Institute of World Politics, November.
Wang, Y. 2008. Public diplomacy and the rise of Chinese soft power. The Annals of the American Academy 616 (1): 257–273.
Wallin, N. 2012. The New American public diplomacy imperative. American Security Project. https://www.americansecurityproject.org/ASP%20Reports/Ref%200071%20-%20The%20New%20Public%20Diplomacy%20Imperative.pdf.
Wittek, K. 2006. Und das in Goethes Namen. Das Goethe-Institut von 1951-1976. Berlin: Vistas. [In Goethe’s Name: the Institute, 1951-76].
Zaharna, R.S. 2004. From propaganda to public diplomacy in the information age. In War, media and propaganda, ed. Y.R. Kamlipour and N. Snow. Lahham, MD: Rowman Litttlefield.
Zaharna, R.S. 2014. China’s Confucius Institutes: Understanding the relational structure & relational dynamics of network collaboration. Los Angeles: USC Center on Public Diplomacy, Figueroa Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brett, K., Schaefer, T. Formalizing the American brand: the case for the US culture, language, and soft-power institutes. Place Brand Public Dipl 15, 124–133 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00120-y
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00120-y