Skip to main content
Log in

ORPHA, ORPHIC FUNCTIONS, AND THE ORPHIC ANALYST: WINNICOTT’S “REGRESSION TO DEPENDENCE” IN THE LANGUAGE OF FERENCZI*

  • Article
  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

Early developmental trauma is imprinted in the psyche by survival fragmentation and dissociation. Traumatized patients need the analyst to be actively involved and allow for regression to dependence in order to strengthen, create and construct their psychic functioning and structure so that environmental failures will be contained and not rupture continuity of being. I suggest that Ferenczi’s and Winnicott’s ideas about regression to dependence in analysis are fundamental contributions to these quests, and that Ferenczi set the foundation, which Winnicott further explored and developed. I would like to focus on their clinical theory of treating early developmental trauma of the psyche, describing it in the less known language of Ferenczi, reviving his concept of Orpha and its functions. The complementarities of the two approaches can enrich and broaden our understanding of the clinical complications that arise in the analysis of such states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bollas, C. (1999). Dead mother, dead child. In The mystery of things. London & New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Borgogno, F. (2008). The relevance of “role reversal” in today’s psychoanalytic work. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 17, 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. (1774–1776). A new system or an analysis of ancient mythology. London: J. Walker. Published in 1807. Google: www. https://archive.org/details/anewsystemorana00bryagoog

  • Ferenczi, S. (1927). The adaptation of the family to the child. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi, M.D. (pp. 61–76). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1955.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1928). The elasticity of psycho-analytic technique. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi, M.D. (pp. 87–101) New York, NY: Basic Books, 1955.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1929). The unwelcome child and his death instinct. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi, M.D. (pp. 102–106). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1955.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child-analysis in the analysis of the adults. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi, M.D. (pp. 126–142).York: Basic Books, 1955.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1932). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.) M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson (Trans.) Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press, 1988.

  • Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. In Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis: The Selected Papers of Sandor Ferenczi, M.D. (pp. 156–167). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1955.

  • Fortune, C. (2003). The analytic nursery: Ferenczi’s “wise baby” meets Jung’s “divine child”. Journal of Analytic Psychology, 48, 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. B. (1998). Ferenczi’s trauma theory. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 58, 41–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. The Standard Edition, Vol. 18, 7-64. London: Hogarth.

  • Galdi, G. (1999). In these pages…. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, R. (1955). Greek Myths (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotstein, J. (2010). “Orphans of O”: The negative therapeutic reaction and the longing for the childhood that never was. In J. Van Buren & S. Alhanti (Eds.), Primitive mental states: A psychoanalytic exploration of the origin of meaning. (pp. 8–30). London & New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, H. (2008). The language of absence. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 561–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, H. (2014). The return of dissociation as absence within absence. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 313–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich, H. (2015). The language of absence and the language of tenderness: Therapeutic transformation of early psychic trauma and dissociation as resolution of the “identification with the aggressor”. Fort Da, 21, 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynal, A. (2014). Trauma—revisited: Ferenczi and modern psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34, 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshed, D. (2003). Trauma and daimonic reality in Ferenczi’s later work. The Journal of Analytic Psychology, 48, 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keve, T. (2012). Ferenczi remembered. In J. Szekacs-Weisz & T. Keve (Eds.), Ferenczi and his World: Rekindling the spirit of the Budapest School. (pp. 1–30). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. H. (2014). Fear of breakdown and the unlived life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 205–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papadima, M. (2006). Dissociation, the true self, and the notion of the frozen baby. Psychodynamic Practice, 12, 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussillon, R. (2011). Primitive agony and symbolization. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnytsky, P.L. (1991). The psychoanalytic vocation. Rank, Winnicott, and the legacy of Freud. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

  • Shengold, L. (1989). Soul murder: The effects of childhood abuse and deprivation. New Haven, CT: Balantine Books, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.A. (1998a). The strength of “creative impulse” in the aftermath of trauma: Discussion of “I Made a Picture of My Life-a Life from the Picture” by Pirkko Siltala. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7, 159–162.

  • Smith, N. A. (1998b). Orpha reviving: Toward an honorable recognition of Elizabeth Severn. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 7, 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. A. (1999). From Oedipus to Orpha: Revisiting Ferenczi and Severn’s landmark case. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 345–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. A. (2001). Angels in the architecture: Contemporary case of a Orphic functioning. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 29, 575–583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner J. (1993). Psychic retreats: Pathological organizations of the personality in psychotic, neurotic, and borderline patients. London & New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1954). Metapsychological and clinical aspects of regression within the psycho-analytical set-up. In D. W. Winnicott: Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. (pp. 278–294). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1958. (Original work read at Scientific Meeting of the British Psycho-Analytic Society, on 17th March, 1954. Also published in Int.J.Psycho-Anal., 36, 1955)

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1949). Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. In D. W. Winnicott: Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. (pp. 243–254). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1958. (Original work read at Scientific Meeting of the British Psycho-Analytic Society, 14th December, 1949. Also Published in Brit.J.Med.Psychol. 1954, 27).

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1955). Withdrawal and regression. In D. W. Winnicott: Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis. (pp. 255–261). New York, NY: Basic Books, 1958.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1956). On transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 37, 386–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1959). Classification: Is there a psycho-analytic contribution to psychiatric classification? In D. W. Winnicott: The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. (pp. 124–139). London: Hogarth Press, 1965. (Original work read at Scientific Meeting of the British Psycho-Analytic Society, 18 March 1959, and Postscript 1964).

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1962). The theory of parent-infant relationship—Further Remarks. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 238–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1963). Dependence in infant-care, in child-care, and in psycho-analytic setting. In D. W. Winnicott: The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. (pp. 249–259). London: Hogarth Press, 1965. (Original work published in International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1963, 44:339)

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1964). The importance of the setting in meeting regression in psycho-analysis. In C. Winnicott, et al. (Eds.) D. W. Winnicott: Psychoanalytic explorations. (pp. 96–102). London: Karnac Books. 1989.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965). Notes on withdrawal and regression. In C. Winnicott, et al. (Eds.) D. W. Winnicott: Psychoanalytic explorations. (pp. 149–151). London: Karnac Books. 1989.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1974). Fear of breakdown. International Review of Psycho-analysis, 1, 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1987). Withdrawal and regression. In D. W. Winnicott: Human Nature. (pp.141–142). London: Free Association.

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In D. W. Winnicott: The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. (1965). pp 37–55) (p. 1965). London: Hogarth Press.

  • Winnicott, C., Shepherd, R. & Davis, M. (1989). Postscript: D.W.W on D.W.W. In D. W. Winnicott: Psycho-analytic explorations. London: Karnac.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayuta Gurevich.

Additional information

Address Correspondence to Hayuta Gurevich, 52 Nachmani st., Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurevich, H. ORPHA, ORPHIC FUNCTIONS, AND THE ORPHIC ANALYST: WINNICOTT’S “REGRESSION TO DEPENDENCE” IN THE LANGUAGE OF FERENCZI* . Am J Psychoanal 76, 322–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9049-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-016-9049-2

Keywords

Navigation