Skip to main content
Log in

Firms’ FDI ownership: The influence of government ownership and legislative connections

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The level of ownership in an overseas subsidiary has been an important issue in international business. Existing literature, based on transaction cost theory, predicts that firms prefer higher ownership for subsidiaries located in favorable foreign institutional environments. We propose two moderating factors to this prediction: governments as owners of firms and firms’ legislative connections. We hypothesized that the level of subsidiary ownership was less affected by the heterogeneity of foreign institutional environments for firms with a higher level of government ownership and for firms with legislative connections. These two interaction effects were tested using a sample of overseas subsidiaries documented in the 2010 annual reports of listed Chinese firms. The empirical findings provide robust support for the hypothesized effects. This study offers fresh insight on the role of government and political factors in firms’ internationalization activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulakh, P. S., Jiang, M. S., & Pan, Y. 2010. International technology licensing: Monopoly rents, transaction costs and exclusive rights. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4): 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. 1984. Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., & Banks, J. C. 1987. Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 18 (2): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonardi, J. 2011. Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9 (3): 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. 2003. Transaction cost-enhanced entry mode choices and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (12): 1239–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. 2007. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebula, R. J., & Clark, J. R. 2012. Lessons from the experience of OECD nations on macroeconomic growth and economic freedom, 2004–2008. International Review of Economics, 59 (3): 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J., Ding, Y., & Kim, C. 2010. High-level politically connected firms, corruption, and analyst forecast accuracy around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (9): 1505–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1 (3): 381–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Feijien, E., & Laeven, L. 2008. Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (3): 554–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4 (16): 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Dau, L. A. 2009. Promarket reforms and firm profitability in developing countries. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (6): 1348–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. 2008. Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (6): 957–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., & Jiang, F. M. 2012. State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (3): 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10): 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., Wu, Z. J., & Zhou, N. 2006. A new perspective on ownership identities in China’s listed companies. Management and Organization Review, 2 (3): 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinc, I. S. 2005. Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2): 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinc, I. S., & Gupta, N. 2011. The decision to privatize: Finance and politics. Journal of Finance, 66 (1): 241–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96 (1): 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, T., & Wang, G. 2010. How private enterprises establish organizational legitimacy in China’s transitional economy. Journal of Management Development, 29 (4): 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. 1996. Reputation: Realizing the value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., & Naticchioni, P. 2010. Moonlighting politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (9–10): 688–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Canal, E., & Guillen, M. F. 2008. Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (10): 1097–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4 (2): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. 2008. Public (self)-service: Illegal trading on confidential congressional information. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2 (1): 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B., & Mause, K. 2012. Delegation, accountability and legislator moonlighting: Agency problems in Germany. German Politics, 21 (3): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. 2001. Econometric analysis, (4th edn). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J. 2000. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 16 (2): 334–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. 2003. The strategic organization of political risks and opportunities. Strategic Organization, 1 (4): 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 49 (9): 1432–1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. 1999. Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 24 (4): 825–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. 2005. The determinants of MNE subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (3): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. 1999. Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (1): 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, O. K., Thomas, W., & Vyas, D. 2011. The cost of pride: Why do firms from developing countries bid higher? Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (1): 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, A. 2013. Politics may be a “24-hour job” but house rules make it easy for MPs to earn extra income. National Post, 21 June: A.5.

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1): 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Ramaswamy, K. 2007. End of the multinational: Emerging markets redraw the picture. Journal of Business Strategy, 28 (5): 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30 (1): 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, C. F., Lazzarini, S. G., & Musacchio, A. 2013. Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of state equity purchases. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (6): 1775–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. 1999. Governance matters. Working Paper 2196, World Bank, Washington DC.

  • Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (4): 1371–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1986. The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39 (1): 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. 2003. Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41 (4): 1095–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. V., & O'Brien, J. P. 2010. Can two wrongs make a right? State ownership and debt in a transition economy. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (7): 1297–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. 2012. Market value of members of Congress reached RMB6.4 trillion. China Economy Weekly, 5 March: 42–46.

  • Mani, S., Antia, K. D., & Rindfleisch, A. 2007. Entry mode and equity level: A multilevel examination of foreign direct investment ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (8): 857–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. Y. 2008. Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (3): 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio, A., & Flores-Macias, F. 2009. The return of state-owned enterprises. Harvard International Review. 4 April, http://hir.harvard.edu/the-return-of-state-owned-enterprises, accessed 19 May 2014.

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. 1996. Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 1972. Merger as a response to organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (3): 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K. 2001. Organizational ownership, competitive intensity, and firm performance: An empirical study of the Indian manufacturing sector. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (10): 989–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, K., Li, M., & Veliyath, R. 2002. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: A study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (4): 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. 1997. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61 (4): 30–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, P.C., & Grossman, R. S. 1977. Congressional access to confidential information collected by federal agencies. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 15 (1): 74–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, B., & Hillman, A. J. 2000. The development of business-government strategies by diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2): 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W., Markoczy, L., & Stan, C. V. 2014. The continuing importance of political ties in China. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (1): 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (2): 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaaler, P. M., & Schrage, B. N. 2009. Residual state ownership, policy stability and financial performance following strategic decisions by privatizing telecoms. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (4): 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahabi, M. 2012. Soft budget constraints and predatory states. Review of Radical Political Economics, 44 (4): 468–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. 2012. MPs are earning up to 13 times their salary by taking on second jobs. Mail Online, 23 August.

  • Weidenbaum, M. 1986. Business, government, and the public. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H., & Adams, M. B. 2008. Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (7): 1149–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the four editors of the special issue, the reviewers, and the participants to the special issue conference. We acknowledge the assistance from Drew Harden and Rongwei Chu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lefa Teng.

Additional information

Accepted by Aldo Musacchio, Guest Editor, 13 April 2014. This article has been with the authors for four revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Teng, L., Supapol, A. et al. Firms’ FDI ownership: The influence of government ownership and legislative connections. J Int Bus Stud 45, 1029–1043 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.27

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.27

Keywords

Navigation