Abstract
China’s post—Cultural Revolution economic reforms were based on Deng Xiaoping’s “Socialism with Chinese characteristics,” a theory of incorporating capitalism into central planning co increase productivity, advance Chinese culture, and enhance the interests of the people. Deng realized that in order to attain his goals, a new development path must be established, to wit Chinas scare capitalism. He argued chat socialism and capitalism are “peas in the same pod” because both require planning. The only difference between the two, Deng claimed, was that socialism relied on central planning whereas capitalist planning was determined by marker forces of supply and demand. Since central and market planning were designed to influence economic outcomes, botti are consistent with socialism. In accepting that markets could play a positive role in economic modernization, Deng implicidy admitted thac capitalism could be more efficient in the productive process because the system dwelled on competition and the fulfillment of self-interest. To achieve socialism, Deng hinted that China must go through capitalism, but its usage must be controlled by the state. Thus he insisted that incorporating capitalist ideas into reforms was not violating the Four Cardinal Principles, consisting of upholding the following: (1) the socialist path, (2) the people’s democratic dictatorship, (3) the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and (4) Maoist thought and Marxism-Leninism. Implicit in the Four Cardinal Principles was a relaxation on ideology (au least in Deng’s mind), allowing a more liberal interpretation of socialism. Planning, production, and distribution in accordance with market forces, for example, could be interpreted as socialism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Erza F. Vogol, Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011), 717–22.
Mark Lenard, What Does China Think? (New York: Public Affairs. 2008), 45.
Barry Naughton, Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978–1993 (Cambridge: Syndicate Press, 1995), 7–15.
Huang Yasheng. Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 50–108.
Jeffie Lam, “Operation Yellow Bird: How Tiananmen Activists Fled to Freedom through Hong Kong,” South China Morning Post, May 26, 2014.
Chen Jian, “China’s Involvement In the Vietnam War, 1964–1969,” China Quarterly 142 (June 1995): 356–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/655420.
James Sterngold, “Kakuei Tanaka, 75, Ex-Premier and Political Force in Japan Dies,” New York Times, December 17, 1993.
Iris Chang, The Thread of the Silkworm (New York: Basic Books, 1995), 155.
Sharon Yin, “The Economic Impact of Chinese International Students in the US,” Yale Economic Review, August 3, 2013.
Therese Herketh, Li Lu, and Zhu Wei Xing, “The Effects of China’s One-Child Family after 25 Years,” New England Journal of Medicine 353 (September 2005): 1171–76.
Raksa Arora, “Homeownership Soars in China: Ninety Three Percent Own Their Homes,” Gallup, March 1, 2005, http://www.gallup.com/poll/15082/ homeownership-soars-in-chian.aspx.
Terry Maccalister, “Background: What Caused the 1970s Oil Price Shock?,” Guardian, March 3, 2011.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. China in the World Economy: An OECD Economic Statistical Survey, vol. 1 (London: Kogan Page, 2003), 336.
Copyright information
© 2015 Ken Moak and Miles W. N. Lee
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moak, K., Lee, M.W.N. (2015). Deng Xiaoping Theory. In: China’s Economic Rise and Its Global Impact. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535580_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535580_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55604-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53558-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)