Abstract
In modern industrialized nations, the relationship between the two fundamental functions of higher education is both profound and inseparable: for the society, it maintains and transmits culture, values and norms from one generation to another; for the individual, it helps one overcome disadvantage and gain greater control of one’s life. All pathways point to its promise, prospect, and irrefutable importance. And, its importance for women is especially significant as they seek to achieve independence, from both men and the state: education provides them with means to a career, to an escape from patriarchal structures both within and outside the home, to economic, emotional, and familial well-being, and to decision-making over their lives. Education is “the prerequisite for improvement in women’s status” (Tinker 1990, p. 33), and the implications of its worth extend way beyond the immediacy of one’s participation in it.
Education is the single most consistent and powerful instrument for the advancement of an individual and a people.
(Johnnetta B. Cole)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aslanbeigui, Nahid, Steve Pressman, and Gale Summerfield. 1994. Women in the age of economic transformation. London: Routledge.
Biblarz, Timothy J., and Adrian E. Rafferty. 1999. Family structure, educational attainment, and socioeconomic success: Rethinking the pathology of matriarchy. American Journal of Sociology 105: 321–365.
Blau, Francine D. 1998. Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. Journal of American Economic Literature 36: 112–165.
Blumberg, Rae Lesser. 1978. Stratification: socioeconomic and sexual inequality. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
Blumberg, Rae Lesser. 1984. A general theory of gender stratification. In Sociological theory, edited by R. Collins. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Butler, Sandra, and Luisa S. Deprez. 2002. Something worth fighting for: Higher education for women on welfare. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 7: 30–54.
Carnevale, Anthony P., and Donna M. Desrochers. 1999. Getting down to business: Matching welfare recipients’ skills to jobs that train, Executive Summary. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
Cotter, David A., Jo Ann Defiore, Joan Hermsen, Brenda M. Kowalewski, and Reeve Vanneman. 1998. The demand for female labor. American Journal of Sociology 103: 1673–1712.
Deprez, Luisa S, and Sandra Butler. 2001. In defense of women’s economic security: Securing access to higher education under welfare reform. Social Politics 8: 210–227.
Deprez, Luisa S., Sandra Butler, and Rebekah J. Smith. 2004. Securing higher education for women on welfare in Maine. In Shut Out: Low income mothers and higher education in post-welfare America, edited by V. Polakow, S. S. Butler, L. S. Deprez and P. Kahn. New York: SUNY Press.
Dreze, Jean, and Amartya Sen. 1995. Basic education as a political issue. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration 9: 1–26.
Educating for the lives of others: An interview with Martha Nussbaum. 2000. On Campus with Women, AACANDC 30 (1):1–16.
Finney, Johanna. 1998. Welfare reform and post-secondary education: research and policy update. IWPR Welfare Reform Network News 2 (1): 1–9.
Gittell, Marilyn, Jill Gross, and Jennifer Holdaway. 1991a. Education in a democratic society: from the 1960s to the 1980s. In Women, work and school: Occupational segregation and the role of education, edited by L. Wolfe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Gittell, Marilyn, Jill Gross, and Jennifer Holdaway. 1991b. Women on welfare: education and work. In Women, work and school: Occupational segregation and the role of education, edited by L. Wolfe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Gittell, Marilyn, Jill Gross, and Jennifer Holdaway. 1993. Building Human Capital: The impact of postsecondary education on AFDC recipients in five states. Report to the Ford Foundation. New York: Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, the City University of New York Graduate School.
Gittell, Marilyn, Jill Gross, Jennifer Holdaway, and Janice Moore. 1989. Denying independence: Barriers to the education of women on AFDC. In Job training for women: The promise and limits of public policies, edited by S. Harlan and R. Steinberg. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Greenberg, Mark, Julie Strawn, and Lisa Plimpton. 1999. State opportunities to provide access to postsecondary education under TANS Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy.
Greenberg, Mark, Julie Strawn, and Lisa Plimpton. 2000. State opportunities to provide access to postsecondary education under TANF. Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy.
Harcourt, Wendy 2001. The capabilities approach for poor women: Empowerment strategies towards gender equality, health and well-being. Paper read at the Conference on Justice and Poverty, Cambridge, England.
Kates, Erika. 1992. Women, welfare and higher education: A selected bibliography. Washington, D.C.: Center for Women Policy Studies.
Kates, Erika. 1996. Colleges help women in poverty. In For crying out loud: Women’s poverty in the United States, edited by D. Dujon and A. Withorn. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Morin, Richard. 2000. What Americans think. The Washington Post Weekly Edition, May 8, 34.
Nettles, Saundra Murray 1991. Higher education as the route to self-sufficiency for low-income women and women on welfare. In Women, work and school: Occupational segregation and the role of education, edited by L. R. Wolfe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. 1996. Pub. Law No. 104–193, U.S. Statute at Large 110 Stat. 2105 codified at 42 U.S.C. sec. 601 1998: 42 U.S.C. sec. 601a2 and 602a1Ai1998.
Polakow, Valerie, Sandra S. Butler, Luisa S. Deprez, and Peggy Kahn, eds. 2004. Shut out: Low income mothers and higher education in post-welfare America. New York: SUNY Press.
Saito, Madoka. 2003. Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education: A critical exploration. Journal of Philosophy of Education 37 (1): 17–33.
Schmidt, Peter 1998. States discourage welfare recipients from pursuing a higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education 44 (20): A34.
Sen, Amartya. 1982. Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: New Holland.
Sen, Amartya. 1990. Gender and cooperative conflicts. In Persistent inequalities, edited by I. Tinker. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1993. Capability and well being. In The quality of life, edited by M. Nussbaum and A. Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spatz, Diana. 2000. Personal communication with authors, June 26.
Thompson, Joanne J. 1993. Women, welfare and college: The impact of higher education on economic well-being. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work 8: 425–441.
Tinker, Irene. 1990. The making of a field In Persistent Inequalities, edited by I. Tinker. New York: Oxford University Press.
Welfare Reform Network News. 1998. Post secondary education leads to increased earnings for welfare recipients. Newsletter of the Institute of Women’s Policy Research.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Melanie Walker and Elaine Unterhalter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deprez, L.S., Butler, S.S. (2007). The Capability Approach and Women’s Economic Security: Access to Higher Education under Welfare Reform. In: Walker, M., Unterhalter, E. (eds) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604810_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604810_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53573-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-60481-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)