Abstract
For most the twentieth century, the serious study of Shakespeare’s works was founded on a general acceptance of the principles of Platonic idealism and essentialism, and a belief in the existence of universals. In textual criticism, the New Bibliography that emerged from the work of A. J. Pollard, W. W. Greg, and R. B. McKerrow in the first decades of the century assumed a relatively unproblematic application of Platonic idealism for the relationship between the play as conceived in the mind of the dramatist and the play as performed or written down. Since the 1980s idealism, essentialism, and universals have become dirty words as the New Historicism and Cultural Materialism popularized an unthinking association between these philosophical principles and political conservatism. In these new and related schools, the alleged antidote to all three evils was said to be materialism, which meant paying more attention to the physical (often the economic) realities of a system under consideration than to the ideas in it. In respect of the textual condition of Shakespeare’s plays, this meant attending to the material particularities of the early quarto and Folio texts rather than seeking to extrapolate back from those to a lost authorial manuscript that preceded them or, worse still, to whatever it is Shakespeare had ‘in mind’ when he composed them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Terry Eagleton, Ideology: An Introduction (London: Verso, 1991), 33–159.
Slavoj Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989).
Clifford Geertz, ‘The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man’, in John R. Platt, ed., New Views of the Nature of Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), 93–118 (107).
Stephen Greenblatt, Renaissance Self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), 3.
Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy and Its Connections with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1946), 146.
René Descartes, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia (Paris: Michael Soly, 1641).
Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson’s University Library, 1949).
Daniel C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987).
Fritz Heider and Mary-Ann Simmel, ‘An Experimental Study of Apparent Behaviour’, American Journal of Psychology 57 (1944), 243–249.
William Shakespeare, Venus and Adonis: A Masque for Puppets (work-in-progress), directed by Gregory Doran at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon on 10 October 2004 as part of the New Work Festival, 29 September–17 October.
Daniel C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained, illustrated by Paul Weiner (London: Penguin, 1993).
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), 189–201.
Susan Blackmore, The Meme Machine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 67–81.
Vittorio Gallese, Luciano Fadiga, Leonardo Fogassi, and Giacomo Rizzolatti, ‘Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex’, Brain 119 (1996), 593–609.
Michael A. Arbib, ‘From Monkey-like Action Recognition to Human Language: An Evolutionary Framework for Neurolinguistics’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2005), 105–167.
Claude Lévi-Strauss, The Raw and the Cooked, trans. John and Doreen Weightman, in volume 1 of Mythologiques: Introduction to the Science of Mythology (London: Cape, 1970), 20.
F. Elizabeth Hart, ‘The Renaissance Theory of “Things” and “Words”, or What Iago Knows That Othello Doesn’t’, paper for the seminar ‘Theorizing the Mind in English Renaissance Literature’ at the National Convention of the Modern Language Association of America held in Washington, DC, 27–30 December 2005.
David Premack and Guy Woodruff, ‘Does the Chimpanzee Have a “Theory of Mind”?’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1978), 515–526.
Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan M. Leslie, and Uta Frith, ‘Does the Autistic Child Have a “Theory of Mind”?’ Cognition 21 (1985), 37–46.
Unless otherwise stated all quotations of plays are from William Shakespeare, The Complete Works, ed. Stanley Wells, Gary Taylor, John Jowett, and William Montgomery, 1989. Electronic edition prepared by William Montgomery and Lou Burnard (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Tiffany Stern, Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).
Evelyn Tribble, ‘Distributing Cognition in the Globe’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005), 135–55 (140).
Robert Humphrey Gyde, ‘Speaking Apart: The Formation and Exploration of Character Through the Aside and Soliloquy in Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama’, unpublished PhD thesis, Stanford University, California, 1990.
Bruce R. Smith, ‘Hearing Green: Logomarginality in Hamlet’, 1.1–2, Early ModernLiteraryStudies 7:1(2001), n.p., onlineat http://www.purl.oclc.org/emls/07–1/logomarg/intro.htm, accessed 9 August 2001.
Margreta de Grazia, Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), 222–226.
Gabriel Egan, ‘Foucault’s Epistemic Shift and Verbatim Repetition in Shakespeare’, in Richard Meek, Jane Rickard, and Richard Wilson, eds, Shakespeare’s Book (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2008), 123–139.
William Shakespeare, Hamlet, ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor, The Arden Shakespeare (London: Thomson Learning, 2006); Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623, ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor, The Arden Shakespeare (London: Thomson Learning, 2006).
Roger Lewis, ‘The Hortatory Hamlet’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 72 (1978), 59–60; William Shakespeare, [Hamlet] The Tragicall Historie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke. Newly Imprinted and Enlarged, STC 22276 (Q2a) (London: [J. Roberts] for N. L[ing], 1604), N3v.
John Jowett, Shakespeare and Text, Oxford Shakespeare Topics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 3.
Plato, The Republic, trans. and ed. Francis Macdonald Cornford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941), 10: 595a–608b, pp. 314–32.
Philip Sidney Sidney, The Defence of Poesie, STC 22535 (London: [Thomas Creede] for William Ponsonby, 1595), B4v–Clr.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Gabriel Egan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Egan, G. (2011). Shakespeare, Idealism, and Universals: The Significance of Recent Work on the Mind. In: Cefalu, P., Reynolds, B. (eds) The Return of Theory in Early Modern English Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299986_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299986_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58902-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29998-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)