Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Evaluation Association (AEA). The guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved June 3, 2008, from http://www.eval.org.

  • Barringer, F. (October 21, 1999). Appeals Court rejects damages against ABC in Food

    Google Scholar 

  • Lion case. The New York Times, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Retrieved June 3, 2008, from http://www.business-humanrights.org/Home.

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2006). Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1956). Critique of practical reason (J. W. Beck, Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Original work published 1788).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. L., & Brown, R. D. (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1995). Philosophy of education. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. 1. (L. Brown, Ed.). (1993). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83–97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (April, 2004). Trustworthiness: Beyond procedures to probity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (April, 2007). Institutional review boards: Monitoring procedures or seeking probity? In The institutional review board and qualitative research: Ethical issues. Symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallis, S. F., Rossman, G. B., & Gajda, R. (2007). Trustworthiness in evaluation practice: An emphasis on the relational. In L. Goodyear (Ed.), Beyond the guiding principles for evaluators: Professional ethics, cultural norms and trustworthiness in evaluation. Special issue of Evaluation and Program Planning, 30 404–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being shamelessly eclectic. Quality and Quantity, 28 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting psychological research. Psychological Science 5(3), 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, D. M., & Sadker, M. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America’s schools cheat girls. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskin, L. (1994). Seduction and desertion: Implicit promises in qualitative research. Unpublished remarks delivered at the Spencer Hall conference on Teacher Development: London, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL). Informed consent policy statement and release. Retrieved June 3, 2008, from http://www.tesol.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Sharon F. Rallis and Gretchen B. Rossman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rallis, S.F., Rossman, G.B. (2009). Ethics and Trustworthiness. In: Heigham, J., Croker, R.A. (eds) Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics