Skip to main content

International Trade Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

International trade theory provides explanations for the pattern of international trade and the distribution of the gains from trade. The theory convinces most economists of the benefits of liberal trade. But many non-economists oppose liberal trade. Opponents include some who may have encountered trade theory but nevertheless fall prey to fallacious reasoning. This article attempts to convey why trade theory is so persuasive to economists and also to deal with why many non-economists are not persuaded.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anderson, J., and E. van Wincoop. 2003. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review 93: 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., and E. van Wincoop. 2004. Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 691–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., J. Eaton, B. Jenson, and S. Kortum. 2003. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 93: 1268–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhofen, D., and J. Brown. 2004. A direct test of the theory of comparative advantage: The case of Japan. Journal of Political Economy 112: 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., and D. Weinstein. 2002. An account of global factor trade. American Economic Review 91: 1423–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. 1984. The general validity of the law of comparative advantage. Journal of Political Economy 88: 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., and V. Norman. 1986. Gains from trade without lump-sum compensation. Journal of International Economics 21: 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 2002. Technology, geography and trade. Econometrica 70: 1741–1779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. 1982a. National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review 73: 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. 1982b. Decreasing costs in international trade and Frank Graham’s argument for protection. Econometrica 50: 1243–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. 2003. Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresser, E. 2002. Toughest on the poor. Foreign Affairs 81(6): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R. 2001. Second best redistributive policies: The case of international trade. Journal of Public Economic Theory 3: 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., and P. Krugman. 1985. Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. 1987. Heckscher–Ohlin trade theory. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M., and H. Wan. 1986. Gains from trade with and without lump-sum compensation. Journal of International Economics 21: 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review 70: 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J., and A. Schweinberger. 1986. Factor content functions and the theory of international trade. Review of Economic Studies 53: 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The general statement of comparative advantage is that on average a country will import goods that are relatively expensive in autarky. Let m denote the vector of excess demands in equilibrium, positive for imports and negative for imports. Let p denote the vector of relative prices in autarky in the home country and let p * denote the vector of relative prices in autarky in the foreign country. Then the vector inner product (p − p*)'m ≥ 0.

The key requirement for the proposition is ‘as if’ optimization by consumers and producers, leading downward-sloping demand and upward-sloping supply in the generalized sense (the substitution effects matrix of real income-compensated excess demands, \( {m}_p^c \), is negative semi-definite). If the actual trade equilibrium involves trade distortions, the additional requirement is that trade not be on balance subsidized. Let t be the vector of trade taxes, positive for import taxes and negative for export taxes (and negative for import subsidies and positive for export subsidies). The requirement is t’m ≥ 0.

The ‘buy low, sell high’ logic implies that a surplus is captured by trade, so comparative advantage trade is closely linked to the gains from trade. ‘As if’ optimization means that consumers lower the expenditure required to support given real income by reallocating consumption in trade equilibrium as compared with autarky, while optimization by producers means that income is raised by reallocating production in trade equilibrium as compared with autarky.

Similar comparative advantage statements can be made concerning the factor content of trade; countries tend to import (embodied in goods) the factors that are relatively expensive in autarky (see Neary and Schweinberger 1986).

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Anderson, J.E. (2008). International Trade Theory. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2280-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2280-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics