Skip to main content
Log in

Exposing the conjuring trick: Wittgenstein on subjectivity

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the publication of the Philosophical Investigations in 1953, Wittgenstein's later philosophy of mind has been the subject of numerous books and articles. Although most commentators agree that Wittgenstein was neither a behaviorist nor a Cartesian dualist, many continue to ascribe to him a position that strongly resembles one of the alternatives. In contrast, this paper argues that Wittgenstein was strongly opposed to behaviorism and Cartesianism, and that he was concerned to show that these positions implicitly share a problematic assumption. This assumption is a seemingly innocent idea that subjectivity, or mind, is some kind of object or thing. The paper provides a detailed survey of Wittgenstein's critique of Cartesianism and behaviorism, as well as an outline of Wittgenstein's alternative account of subjectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, M. 1989. Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chihara, C. S. and Fodor, J. A. 1966. Operationalism and ordinary language: A critique of Wittgenstein. In: G. Pitcher (ed), Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations, pp. 384–419. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. W. 1969. Human beings. In: P. Winch (ed), Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, pp. 117–151. London: Routledge and Kegal Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes,Vol. II., trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donagan, A. 1966. Wittgenstein on sensation. In: G. Pitcher (ed), Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations, pp. 324–351. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P. 1990. Sense and Subjectivity: A Study of Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, S. 1998. On Being with Others: Heidegger-Derrida-Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. M. S. 1993. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Part I: Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. M. S. 1997. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1975. In: F.-W. von Herrmann (ed), Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1993. Sein und Zeit.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 2002. In: M. Michalski (ed), Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Hintikka, M. 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1991. In: S. Strasser (ed), Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P. 1993. Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 1982. Criteria, defeasibility, and knowledge. Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 455–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 1989. Wittgenstein and the inner world. The Journal of Philosophy 86: 643–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M. 1998. The real problem of others: Cavell, Merleau-Ponty and Wittgenstein on scepticism about other minds. European Journal of Philosophy 6: 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. 1990. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundle, C. W. K. 1966. “Private language” and Wittgenstein's kind of behaviourism. The Philosophical Quarterly 16: 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, G. 1964. The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, A. J. 1998. What it's like and what's really wrong with physicalism: A Wittgensteinian perspective. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5: 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. 2000. The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass, L. 1994. The Paradoxes of Delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the Schizophrenic Mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigny, E. von. 1996. Der Mensch als Mitmensch: WittgensteinsPhilosophische Untersuchungen”. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. 1993a. Wittgenstein + Heidegger on the stream of life. Inquiry 36: 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. 1993b. Wittgenstein: mind, body, and society. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23: 285–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, J. 1993. Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1958. In: R. Rhees (ed), The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1963. Philosophical Investigations.Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1967. In: G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (eds), Zettel. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Wittgenstein's notes for lectures on “private experience” and “sense data”. The Philosophical Review 77: 271–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1975. In: R. Rhees (ed), Philosophical Remarks. Trans. R. Hargreaves and R. White. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1980a. In: G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (eds), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology,Vol. I, Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1980b. In: G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman (eds), Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology,Vol. II, trans. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1982. In: G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman (eds), Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology,Vol. I, trans. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1992. In: G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman (eds), Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology,Vol. II, trans. C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overgaard, S. Exposing the conjuring trick: Wittgenstein on subjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 263–286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000049303.10575.3c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000049303.10575.3c

Navigation