Skip to main content
Log in

Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 1. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complementarity in the distribution of tree and crop root systems is important to minimise competition for resources whilst maximising resource use in agroforestry systems. A field study was conducted on a kaolinitic Oxisol in the sub-humid highlands of western Kenya to compare the distribution and dynamics of root length and biomass of a 3-year-old Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex R. Br. (grevillea) tree row and a 3-year-old Senna spectabilis DC. (senna) hedgerow grown with Zea mays L. (maize). Tree roots were sampled to a 300 cm depth and 525 cm distance from the tree rows, both before and after maize cropping. Maize roots were sampled at two distances from the tree rows (75–150 cm and 450–525 cm) to a maximum depth of 180 cm, at three developmental stages. The mean root length density (Lrv) of the trees in the upper 15 cm was 0.55 cm cm−3 for grevillea and 1.44 cm cm−3 for senna, at the start of the cropping season. The Lrv of senna decreased at every depth during the cropping season, whereas the Lrv of grevillea only decreased in the crop rooting zone. The fine root length of the trees decreased by about 35% for grevillea and 65% for senna, because of maize competition, manual weeding, seasonal senescence or pruning regime (senna). At anthesis, the Lrv of maize in the upper 15 cm was between 0.8 and 1.5 cm cm−3. Maize root length decreased with greater proximity to the tree rows, potentially reducing its ability to compete for soil resources. However, the specific root length (m g−1) of maize was about twice that of the trees, so may have had a competitive uptake advantage even when tree root length was greater. Differences in maize fine root length and biomass suggest that competition for soil resources and hence fine root length may have been more important for maize grown with senna than grevillea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthofer J 1995 Nutritional and Allelopathic Effects of Nine Agroforestry Tree Species on Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the Ethiopian Highlands. PhD Dissertation, Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthofer J, Hanson J and Jutzi S C 1998 Wheat growth as influenced by applications of agroforestry-tree prunings in Ethiopian highlands. Agrofor. Syst. 40, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D 1983 The growth, activity and distribution of the fruit tree root system. Plant Soil 71, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen G D 1985 Roots as a component of tree productivity. In Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants. Eds. MGR Cannell and JE Jackson pp 303–315. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell M G R, Van Noordwijk M and Ong C K 1996 The central agroforestry hypothesis: The tree must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agrofor. Syst. 34, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastham J and Rose C W 1990 Tree/pasture interactions at a range of tree densities in an agroforestry experiment. 1. Rooting patterns. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 41, 683–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat D M 1992 Costs and benefits of constructing roots of smaller diameter. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 763–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter A H 1994 Architecture and biomass allocation as components of the plastic response of root systems to soil heterogeneity. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Eds. MM Caldwell and RW Pearcy pp 305–322. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fownes J H and Anderson D G 1991 Change in nodule and root biomass of Sesbania sesban and Leaucaena leucocephala following coppicing. Plant Soil 138, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner W R 1964 Relations of root distribution to water uptake and availability. Agron. J. 56, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A R 1989 Modelling nutrient flux and interspecies root competition in agroforestry interplanting. Agrofor. Syst. 8, 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland D J 1958 Nitrate fluctuations in tropical soils. J. Agric. Sci. 50, 82–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P J 1996 Approaches to modelling the uptake of water and nutrients in agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 34, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris G A and Campbell G S 1989 Automated quantification of roots using a simple image analyzer. Agron. J. 81, 935–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser S 1993 Root distribution of Dactyladenia (Acioa) barteri and Senna (Cassia) siamea in alley cropping on Ultisol. I. Implication for field experimentation. Agrofor. Syst. 24, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulugalle N R and Ndi J N 1994 Changes in soil properties of a newly-cleared ultisol due to establishment of hedgerow species in alley cropping systems. J. Agric. Sci. 122, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley P A, Pinney A, Akunda E and Muraya P 1994 A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with Grevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agrofor. Syst. 26, 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jama B, Buresh R J, Ndufa J K and Shepherd K D 1998 Vertical distribution of tree roots and soil nitrate as affected by tree species and phosphorous. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 280–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones M and Sinclair F 1996 Differences in root system responses of two semi-arid tree species to crown pruning. Agrofor. Forum 7 (2), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson K, Fidjeland L, Maghembe J A and Hogberg P 1988 The vertical distribution of fine roots of five tree species and maize in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor. Syst. 6, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchoff G and Pendar C E 1995 Delta-T Scanner - User Manual v.2.0. Ed. Webb N. Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J and Zech W 1998 Fine root turnover of irrigated hedgerow intercropping in Northern Kenya. Plant Soil 198 19–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livesley S J, Gregory P J and Buresh R J 2000a Competition between trees and crops in tree row agroforestry systems. 2. Distribution, dynamics and uptake of soil inorganic N. Plant Soil (submitted).

  • Livesley S J, Gregory P J and Buresh R J 2000b Competition between trees and crops in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Distribution and dynamics of soil water. Plant Soil (submitted).

  • Mekonnen K, Buresh R J and Jama B 1997 Root and inorganic nitrogen distributions in sesbania fallow, natural fallow and maize. Plant Soil 188, 319–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen K, Buresh R J, Coe R and Kipleting K 1999 Root length and nitrate under Sesbania sesban: Vertical and horizontal distribution and variability. Agrofor. Syst. 42, 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel D B and Barber S A 1974 Development and distribution of the corn root system under field conditions. Agron. J. 66, 341–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong C K and Black C R 1995 Complementarity in resource use in agroforestry systems. In Alley Farming - Research and Development. Eds. BT Kang, AO Osiname and A Larbi pp 73–89. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson H 1989 Methods of studying root dynamics in relation to nutrient cycling. In Nutrient Cycling in Terrestrial Systems. Eds. AF Harrison, P Ineson and OW Heal. pp 198–217. Elsevier Science Publishing Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M R, Muraya P and Huxley P A 1993 Observations of some tree root systems in agroforestry intercrop situations and their graphical representation. Exp. Agric. 29, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhigwa B A, Gichuru M P, Mambani B and Tariah N M 1992 Root distribution of Acioa barteri, Alchornea cordifolia, Cassia siamea and Gmelina arborea in an acid Ultisol. Agrofor. Syst. 19, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser P and Lambers H 1995 Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast-and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant Soil 170, 251–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G 1994 Above-and Below-Ground Interactions in Alley Cropping with Gliricidia sepium as Compared to Conventional and Mulched Sole Cropping on a High Base Status Soil in the West African Rainforest Zone. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bayreuther University, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G 1995 Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 30, 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G and Zech W 1995 Root length dynamics in agroforestry with Gliricidia sepium as compared to sole cropping in the semideciduous rainforest of West Africa. Plant Soil 170, 297–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R P, Ong C K and Saharan N 1989 Above-and below-ground interactions in alley-cropping in semi-arid India. Agrofor. Syst. 9, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smucker A J M, Ellis B G and Kang B T 1995 Alley cropping on an Alfisol in the forest savanna transition zone: root, nutrient and water dynamics. In Alley Farming - Research and Development. Eds. BT Kang, OA Osiname and A Larbi pp 103–121. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S K, Singh K P and Upadhayay R S 1986 Fine root growth dynamics in teak (Tectona grandis). Can. J. For. Sci. 16, 1360–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone E L and Kalisz P J 1991 On the maximum extent of tree roots. For. Ecol. Man. 46, 59–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M 1989 Rooting depth in cropping systems in the humid tropics in relation to nutrient use efficiency. In Nutrient Management for Food Crop Production in Tropical Farming Systems. Ed. J Van der Heide pp 157–169. Institute of Soil Fertility, Haren, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumare A, Groot J J R and Hariah K 1996 Root distribution of trees and crops competition and/or complementarity. In Tree Crop Interactions - A Physiological Approach. Eds. CK Ong and P Huxley Chapter 9, pp 319–364. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Widianto H M and Hairiah K 1991 Old tree root channels in acid soils in the humid tropics: important for crop root penetration, water infiltration and nitrogen management. Plant Soil 134, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livesley, S., Gregory, P. & Buresh, R. Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 1. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass. Plant and Soil 227, 149–161 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026551616754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026551616754

Navigation