Abstract
A comparative study of butterfly communities in 15 urban/suburban remnants of tropical semideciduous forest in Campinas (São Paulo state, SE Brazil; 24°S, 47°W), with areas from 1.0 to 252 ha and widely varying histories and environments, shows that the most significant factors, besides area and sampling time, distinguishing the sites and influencing their diversity (80–702 species) and composition are connectivity, permanent water, vegetation, flowers, and human impact (negative, including pollution). The diversified Nymphalidae butterflies (38–213 species) and especially two fermented-bait-attracted groups (Satyrinae, 2–30 species, and Biblidini, 9–44 species), are among the more useful indicators of the quality and diversity of the environments in these fragments. Effective conservation of butterfly communities in tropical cities may be achieved by maintenance of arboreal green corridors along streets and watercourses between moderately large (>10 ha) humid areas, not near to the most built-up or polluted city centre(s), and the inclusion within these areas of ponds or streams, diversified native forest, and open vegetation including abundant nectar-rich flowers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accacio, G. (1997) Borboletas em parques urbanos: Estudos na cidade de São Paulo. Master's Dissertation: Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, iii + 136 pp.
Alkutkar, A., Athalye, P., Adhikari, S., Ranade, A., Patwardhan, M., Kunte, K. and Patwardhan, A. (2001) Diversity of trees and butterflies in forest fragments around Pune city. In Tropical ecosystems: Structure, diversity and human welfare (K.N. Ganeshaiah, R. Uma Shaankar and K.S. Bawa, eds), pp. 685–8. New Delhi: Oxford-IBH.
Brown Jr., K.S. (1972) Maximizing daily butterfly counts. J. Lepid. Soc. 26, 183–96.
Brown Jr., K.S. (1991) Conservation of Neotropical environments: Insects as indicators. In The conservation of insects and their habitats (N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds), pp. 349–404. London: Academic Press/Royal Entomological Society.
Brown Jr., K.S. (1992) Borboletas da Serra do Japi: Diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. In Historia natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil (L.P.C. Morellato, ed), pp. 142–86. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.
Brown Jr., K.S. (1997) Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical forests: Insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. J. Insect. Conserv. 1, 25–42.
Brown Jr., K.S., Damman, A.J. and Feeny, P. (1981) Troidine swallow tails (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Southeastern Brazil: natural history and foodplant relationships. J. Res. Lepid 19, 199–226.
Brown Jr., K.S. and Freitas, A.V.L. (2000) Atlantic Forest butterflies: Indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32(4b), 934–56.
Brown Jr., K.S., Klitzke, C.F., Berlingeri, C. and Rubbo dos Santos, P.E. (1995) Neotropical swallowtails: Chemistry of food plant relationships, population ecology, and biosystematics. In Swallowtail butterflies: Their ecology and evolutionary biology (J.M. Scriber, Y. Tsubaki and R.C. Lederhouse, eds), pp. 405–45. Gainesville, Florida: Scientific Publishers.
Cardoso, A. 1949. Lepidópteros de Alagoas. Rev. Entomol. 20, 427–36.
CETEC. 2000. Situação dos Recursos H´?dricos das Bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaî. Relatório Técnico Final. Centro Tecnológico da Fundação Paulista de Tecnologia e Educação /Comitê das Bacias do Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí, 2000 (http://www.comitepcj.sp.gov.br/).
Ehrlich, P.R. (1980) The strategy of conservation, 1980-2000. In Conservation biology - an evolutionary-ecological perspective (M.E. Soulé and B.M. Wilcox, eds), pp. 329–344. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Fortunato, L. and Ruszczyk, A. (1997) Comunidades de Lepidopteros frugívoras em áreas verdes urbanas e extraurbanas de Uberlândia, MG. Revta. Bras. Biol. 57, 79–87.
Francini, R.B., Freitas, A.V.L. and Brown Jr., K.S. (2000) Lepidoptera do Estado de São Paulo: diversidade, distribuição, recursos, e uso na análise e monitoramento ambiental (http://genesis.unisantos.com.br/biotasp/)
Freitas, A.V.L., Francini, R.B. and Brown Jr., K.S. (2002) Insetos como indicadores ambientais. In Manual Brasileiro em Biologia da Conservação (L. Cullen, R. Rudran and C. Valladares-P´adua, eds), in press. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Garcia, M.A. (1991) Arthropods in a tropical corn field: Effects of weeds and insecticides on community composition. In Plant-animal interactions: Evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions (P.W. Price, T.M. Lewinsohn, G.W. Fernándes and W.W. Benson, eds), pp. 619–34. New York: John Wiley.
Hobbs, E.R. (1988) Species richness in urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity. Landscape Ecol. 1, 141–52.
Kesselring, J. and Ebert, H. (1982) Relação das borboletas encontradas na ‘Mata do Buraquinho,’ João Pessoa, Estado do Paraíba, Brasil. Revta. Nordestina Biol. 2, 105–18.
Kunte, K. (2000-2001) Butterfly diversity of Pune city along the human impact gradient. J. Ecol. Soc. 13/14, 40–5.
Kunte, K., Joglekar, A., Utkarsch, G. and Padmanabhan, P. (1999) Patterns of butterfly, bird, and tree diversity in theWestern Ghats. Curr. Sci. (India) 77, 577–86.
Laurance, W. and Bierregaard, R.O., eds (1997) Tropical forest remnants. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, xv+616 pp.
McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J. (1997) Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 3.11. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA: MJM Software.
McIntyre, N. (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: A review and a call to action. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93, 825–35.
Morais, A.B.B. and Brown Jr., K.S. (1992) Larval foodplant and other effects on Troidini guild composition (Papilionidae) in southeastern Brazil. J. Res. Lepid. 30, 19–37.
Morellato, P.C. and Leitão Filho, H.F., orgs. (1995) Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana - Reserva de Santa Genebra. Campinas, SP, Brazil: Editora da UNICAMP.
Owen, D.F. (1971) Tropical butterflies: The ecology and behavior of butterflies in the tropics with special reference to African species. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Paoletti, M.G., Pimentel, D., Stinner, B.R. and Stinner, D. (1992) Agroecosystem biodiversity: Matching production and conservation biology. Agri., Ecosyst. Environ. 40, 3–23.
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.L. and Constanza, R. (2001) Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socio-economic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 127–57.
Raven, P.H. (1988) Our diminishing tropical forests. In Biodiversity (E.O. W ilson, ed), pp. 119–22. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rodrigues, J.J.S., Brown Jr., K.S. and Ruszczyk, A. (1993) Resources and conservation of Neotropical butterflies in urban forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 64, 3–9.
Ruszczyk, A. (1986a) Hábitos alimentares de borboletas adultas e sua adaptabilidade ao ambiente urbano. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 46, 419–27.
Ruszczyk, A. (1986b) Organização das comunidades de borboletas (Lepidoptera) nas principais avenidas de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. Revta. Brasil. Entomol. 30, 265–9.
Ruszczyk, A. (1986c) Mortality of Papilio scamander scamander (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) pupae in four districts of Porto Alegre (S. Brazil) and the causes of superabundance of some butterflies in urban areas. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 567–79.
Ruszczyk, A. (1986d) Ecologia urbana de borboletas, I. O gradiente de urbanização e a fauna de Porto Alegre, RS. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 675–88.
Ruszczyk, A. (1986e) Ecologia urbana de borboletas, II. Papilionidae, Pieridae e Nymphalidae em Porto Alegre, RS. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 689–706.
Ruszczyk, A. (1987) Distribution and abundance of butterflies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre, Brazil. J. Res. Lepid. 25, 157–78.
Ruszczyk, A. and Araujo, A.M. (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 46, 255–64.
Santin, D.A. (1999) A vegetação remanescente do município de Campinas (SP). Mapeamento, caracterização fisionômica e florística visando a conservação. Doctoral Thesis: UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil: xviii + 199 pp., 4 anexos (Map; 163 pp.; 3 pp.+178 sites×478 species matrix; 70 pp.). UNICAMP Press, thesis number 38966-7.
Shapiro, A. (2000) The California urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers. Distr. 8, 31–40.
Shapiro, A.M. and Shapiro, A.R. (1973) The ecological associations of the butterflies of Staten Island. J. Res. Lepid. 12, 65–128.
Statsoft Inc. (1995) Statistica for windows [Computer Progam Manual], Tulsa, OK, USA.
Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Smilauer, D. (1999) Canoco for windows, version 4.02, The Netherlands: Centre for Biometry.Wageningen.
Tyler, H., Brown Jr., K.S. and Wilson, K.H. (1994) Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas: A study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics, and conservation. Gainesville, FL: Scientific Publishers.
Vanini, F., Bonato, V. and Freitas, A.V.L. (1999) Polyphenism and population biology of Eurema elathea (Pieridae) in a disturbed environment in tropical Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 53, 159–68.
Whitmore, T.C. and Sayer, J.A. (1992) Tropical deforestation and species extinction. London: Chapman & Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, K.S., Freitas, A.V.L. Butterfly Communities of Urban Forest Fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: Structure, Instability, Environmental Correlates, and Conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 6, 217–231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024462523826
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024462523826