Abstract
A precise fomulation of the strong Equivalence Principle is essential to the understanding of the relationship between gravitation and quantum mechanics. The relevant aspects are reviewed in a context including General Relativity but allowing for the presence of torsion. For the sake of brevity, a concise statement is proposed for the Principle: An ideal observer immersed in a gravitational field can choose a reference frame in which gravitation goes unnoticed. This statement is given a clear mathematical meaning through an accurate discussion of its terms. It holds for ideal observers (time-like smooth non-intersecting curves), but not for real, spatially extended observers. Analogous results hold for gauge fields. The difference between gravitation and the other fundamental interactions comes from their distinct roles in the equation of force.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. L. Synge, Relativity: The General Theory, in the Preface (Wiley, New York, 1960).
C. Lämmerzahl, Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, 1043(1996); “Minimal coupling and the equivalence principle in quantum mechanics, ” arXiv.gr-qc/9807072.
P. D. Mannheim, “The equivalence principle in classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, ” arXiv.gr-qc/9810087.
S. Manoff and B. Dimitrov, “On the existence of a gyroscope in spaces with affine connections and metrics, ” arXiv.gr-qc/0012011.
D. V. Ahluwalia, “Principle of equivalence and wave-particle duality in quantum gravity, ” arXiv.gr-qc/0009033.
T. Damour, “Questioning the equivalence principle, ” arXiv.gr-qc/0109063.
B. Z. Iliev, J. Geom. Phys. 24, 209(1998) and arXiv.gr-qc/9806062.
It is probably to Synge that should be given the credit for stressing the concept of observer, by the emphasis on the “world function” he has put in his treatise.(1) Even so, despite the statement made in Fermi's Collected Papers Editor's comment, true Fermi coordinates(9) deserve only a footnote mention (p. 84). Cosmologists made large use of fundamental observers.(10) Hawking and Ellis(11) discuss “timelike curves” in detail, but have no use for the Principle, implicit in the supposed geometrical framework.
E. Fermi, Collected Papers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962).
G. F. R. Ellis, “Standard and inflationary cosmologies, ” Lectures at the Summer Research Institute on Gravitation, Banff Centre, Banff, Alberta, Canada, August 12–25, 1990, SISSA-Trieste preprint 1990. G. F. R. Ellis and H. van Elst, “Cosmological models, ” Cargèse Lectures 1998, arXiv:gr-qc/9812046 v4.
S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973).
The vanishing of the Levi-Civita connection at a point, a standard geometrical result,(13) is found in most classical texts on general relativity.(14) The construction of a coordinate system in which the Levi-Civita connection vanishes along a curve is due to Fermi.(15) Recently Iliev(16) has extended it to general derivatives, furthermore in the presence of torsion.
S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, 2nd edn. (Interscience, New York, 1996).
C. Møller, The Theory of Relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1966). C. W. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973). R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984). I. Ciufolini and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation and Inertia (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1995).
E. Fermi, Atti R. Accad. Lincei Rend, Cl. Fis. Mat. Nat. 31, 21–23, 51–52, 101–103 (1922). Collected Papers, Ref. 9 above, Vol. I, pp. 17–23.
B. Z. Iliev, J. Phys. A 29, 6895(1996); J. Phys. A 30, 4327(1997); J. Phys. A 31, 1287(1998).
B. Z. Iliev, “Normal frames for linear connections in vector bundles and the equivalence principle in classical gauge theories, ” arXiv:hep-th/0101094.
B. Mashhoon, “Measurement theory and general relativity, ” arXiv.gr-qc/0003014; “Relativity and nonlocality, ” arXiv.gr-qc/0011013.
B. Z. Iliev, not only Refs. 7 and 16 above, but also their early versions: “Special bases for derivations of tensor algebras; I. Cases in a neighborhood and at a point, ” JINR Communication E5–92–507, Dubna, 1992; “Special bases for derivations of tensor algebras; II. Case along paths, ” JINR Communication E5–92–508, Dubna, 1992; “Special bases for derivations of tensor algebras; III. Case along smooth maps with separable points of selfintersection, ” JINR Communication E5–92–543, Dubna, 1992.
D. Hartley, Class. Quantum Grav. 12, L103(1995).
R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, An Introduction to Geometrical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).
L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Théorie des champs, 4th edn. (MIR, Moscow, 1989).
J. L. Synge and A. Schild, Tensor Calculus (Dover, New York, 1978).
S. K. Wong, Nuovo Cimento A 65, 689(1970). W. Drechsler and A. Rosenblum, Phys. Lett. B 106, 81(1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aldrovandi, R., Barros, P.B. & Pereira, J.G. The Equivalence Principle Revisited. Foundations of Physics 33, 545–575 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023728002453
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023728002453