Skip to main content
Log in

A coupled model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on the stomatal behavior for maize (Zea mays L.) grown in the field

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study presents a theoretical basis of a stomatal behavior-based coupled model for estimating photosynthesis, A, and transpiration, E. Outputs of the model were tested against data observed in a maize (Zea mays L.) field. The model was developed by introducing the internal conductance, g ic, to CO2 assimilation, and the general equation of stomatal conductance, g sw, to H2O diffusion, into models of CO2 and H2O diffusion through the stomata of plant leaves. The coupled model is easier for practical use since the model only includes environmental variables, such as ambient CO2 concentration, leaf temperature, humidity and photosynthetic photon flux received at the leaves within the canopy. Moreover, concept of g ic, and factors controlling A and E were discussed, and applicability of the model was examined with the data collected in the maize field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball J T, Woodrow I E and Berry J A 1987 A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Ed. I Biggins. pp. 221–224. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boegh E, Soegaard H, Friborg T and Levy P E 1999 Models of CO2 and vapour fluxes from a sparse millet crop in the Sahel. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 93, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks A and Farquhar G D 1985 Effect of temperature on the CO2/O2 specificity of rebulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light. Planta 165, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caemmerer von S and Farquhar G D 1981 Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collatz G J, Ball J T, Grivet T C and Berry J A 1991 Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 54, 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collatz G J, Ribas-Carbo M and Berry J A 1992 Coupled physiological-stomatal conductance model for leaves C4 plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19, 519–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan I R and Farquhar G D 1977 Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In Integration of Activity in the Higher Plan. Ed. D H Jennings. Society for Experimental Biology Symposia. 31, 471–505.

  • Farquhar G D and Sharkey T D 1982 Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar G D, von Caemmerer S and Berry J A 1980 A biochemical model of photosynthesis CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley P C, Weder J A and Gates D M 1985 Interactive effects of light, leaf temperature, CO2 and O2 on photosynthesis in soybean. Planta 165, 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley P C, Thomas R B, Reynolds J F and Strain B R 1992 Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman P D 1974 The diffusion of carbon dioxide and water vapor through stomata. J. Exp. Bot. 25, 927–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P J 1976 The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 273, 593–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones H G 1985 Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 8, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones H G 1992 Plants and Microclimate. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York. 163–214 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones H G and Slatyer R Q 1972 Estimation of the transport and carboxylation components of the intracellular limitation to leaf photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 50, 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher F M, Leuning R., Raupach M R and Schulze E D 1995 Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 73, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi Y, Nakamura A, Tanaka K and Kobashi S 1997 Characteristics of CO2 and H2O fluxes of leaves of trees under different seasonal and soil moisture conditions in a buffer green zone. J. Jpn. Soc. Reveget. Tech. 22 (3), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd J 1991 Modelling stomatal responses to environment in Macadamia integrifolia. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18, 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R 1990 Modeling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 17, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R 1995 A critical appraisal of a combined stomatalphotosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohammer T, Linder S and Falk O 1980 FAST-simulation models of gaseous exchange in Scots Pine. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32, 505–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtrie R E, Leuning R, Thompson W A and Wheeler A M 1992 A model of canopy photosynthesis and water use incorporating a mechanistic formulation of leaf CO2 exchange. Forest Ecol. Manag. 52, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochette P, Pattey E, Desjardins R L, Dwyer L M, Stewart D W and Dube P A 1991 Estimation of maize (Zea mays L.) canopy conductance by scaling up leaf stomatal conductance. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 54, 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers P J, Berry J A, Collatz G J, Field C B and Hall F G 1992 Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. III. A reanalysis using improved leaf model and a new canopy integration scheme. Remote Sens. Environ. 42, 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers P J, Randall D A, Collatz G J, Berry J A, Field C B, Dazlich D A, Zhang C, Collelo G D and Bounoua L 1996 A Revised land parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. J Climate 9, 676–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward F I and Smith T M 1994 Global photosynthesis and stomatal conductance: Modelling the controls by soil and climate. Adv. Bot. Res. 23, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward F I, Smith T M and Emanuel W R 1995 A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R 1999 A study on modeling stomatal conductance of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves. Tech. Bull. Fac. Hort. Chiba Univ. 53, 145–239 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R and Nakayama K 1997 Development of model for estimating stomatal conductance of maize leaves J. Agric. Meteorol. 52(5), 505–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R, Nakayama K and Lu H Q 1996 Responses of stomatal conductance in field-grown maize leaves to certain environmental factors over a long term. J. Agric. Meteorol. 52(4), 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G R, Nakayama K, Matsuoka N and Kon H 1998 A combination model for estimating stomatal conductance of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves over a long term. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 92, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gui-Rui Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, GR., Kobayashi, T., Zhuang, J. et al. A coupled model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on the stomatal behavior for maize (Zea mays L.) grown in the field. Plant and Soil 249, 401–415 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022888232115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022888232115

Navigation