Skip to main content
Log in

Moral Fibre: The Negotiation of Microscopic Facts in Victorian Britain

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 1840s and 1850s the Britishembryologist and histologist Martin Barry(1802–1855) propounded a bold and originalthesis about the microscopic structure ofanimal and vegetable tissue. He maintainedthat minute double spirals were virtuallyubiquitous in the makeup of a wide range ofstructures. This paper considers how a claimof this kind was consonant with a romanticimage of scientific creativity with which Barryidentified. It describes his partiallysuccessful strategies to convincecontemporaries of the veracity of his claims. Major figures in the field, such as RichardOwen and Jan Evangelista Purkyně, affirmed thatBarry's spirals were real objects in nature. Others, notably William Sharpey, becameconvinced that the spirals were mere artefactsand that Barry was deeply flawed as ascientific investigator. The ultimaterejection of his hypothesis had much to do withthe moral repugnance that Barry's attempts togain credit for a major discovery evoked amonginfluential medical scientists. This negativeassessment of Barry as an investigator revealsthe lineaments of an alternative ethic ofscientific practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. 1841-1842. “Dr. Martin Barry on Fibre.” Lancet2: 643-644.

  • -- 1842-1843. “Discoveries in Embryology (From Professor Valentin's Report on the Progress of Embryology in the Year 1840).” Lancet1: 35-36.

  • -- 1842-1843a. “Dr Martin Barry's Discoveries.” Lancet1: 104-105.

  • -- 1853. “Edinburgh Physiological Society. Session III (Winter1852-1853). - Meeting IV. - 8th January1853.” Monthly Journal of Medical Science16: 272-280.

  • -- 1855. “Obituary Martin Barry.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London7: 577-582.

  • Anti-Spiral. 1843-1844. “Transcendental Anatomy, Strictures of Professor Valentin on the Views of Dr. Martin Barry.” Lancet1: 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Martin. 1834. Ascent to the Summit of Mont Blanc, 16th-18th of 9th Month (Sept r ), 1834. Edinburgh: No Publisher.

  • -- 1837. “On the Unity of Structure in the Animal Kingdom.” Edinburgh New Philosophical Magazine22: 116-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1839. “Researches in Embryology. - Second Series.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society1: 307-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1840. “On the Corpuscles of the Blood.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society1: 595-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1840a. “Researches in Embryology. Third Series.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society1: 529-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1842. “On Fibre.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society1: 89-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1842-1843. “Note in Reply to Dr. Griffiths Remarks on the Pitted Tissue of Plants, on Muscle, &c.” Lancet1: 834-835.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1843. “Note Regarding the Structure of Muscle.” Lancet1: 167-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Martin. 1844. “Strictures on a Work of Professor Bishcoff, of Heidelberg, Entitled 'Entwickelungsgeschichte des Kaninchen-Eies.' (History of the Development of the Ovum of the Rabbit.)” Lancet1: 262-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1847. “On the Nucleus of the Animal and Vegetable 'Cell.' ” Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal43: 201-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1850. “Neue Untersuchungen über die shraubenförmige Beschaffenheit des Elementarfasern derMuskeln, nebst Beobachtungen über die muskulöse Natur der Flimmerhärchen.” Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin1: 529-596.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1850-1854. “On Animal and Vegetable Fibre as Originally Composed of Twin Spiral Filaments, in Which Every Other Structure Has Its Origin; A Note Showing the Confirmation by Agardh, in 1832, of Observations Recorded in the Philosophical Transactions for 1842.” Abstracts of the Papers Communicated to the Royal Society of London6: 293-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1852. “Renewed Inquiries Concerning the Spiral Structure of Muscle, with Observations on the Muscularity of Cilia.” Philosophical MagazineFourth Series 4: 81-98, 177-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1853. “A Main Cause of Discordant Views on the Structure of the Muscular Fibril.” Philosophical MagazineFourth Series 6: 364-372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burwick, Frederick. 1986. The Damnation of Newton: Goethe's Color Theory and Romantic Perception. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew and Nicholas Jardine (eds.) 1990. Romanticism and the Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

  • Desmond, Adrian. 1989. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. University of Chicago Press.

  • Dear, Peter (ed.). 1991. The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Jan. 1984. “Foucault among the Sociologists: The 'Disciplines' and the History of the Professions.” History and Theory23: 170-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1998. Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge University Press.

  • Goodsir, John. 1845. Anatomical and Pathological Observations. Edinburgh: Myles Macphail.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1868. The Anatomical Memoirs of John Goodsir F.R.S., 2 Vols. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, John William. 1843. “Observations on the Formation of the Pitted Tissue of Plants, with One or Two Remarks on the Analogy between the Blood-discs in Animals and the Starch Particles in Vegetables.” Annals and Magazine of Natural History11: 95-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. 1856. “Memoir of the Late Martin Barry, M.D., F.R.SS. L. And E.” Edinburgh Medical Journal1: 81-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas Wharton. 1842. “Observations on Some Points in the Anatomy, Physiology, and Pathology of the Blood.” British and Foreign Medical Review14: 585-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1843. “Observations on the Blood-corpuscles, Particularly with Reference to Opinions Expressed and Conclusions Drawn in Papers 'On the Corpuscles of the Blood,' and 'On Fibre,' Recently Published in the Philosophical Transactions.” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science22: 480-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacyna, L. S. 1983. “John Goodsir and the Making of Cellular Reality.” Journal of the History of Biology16: 75-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1984. “The Romantic Programme and the Reception of Cell Theory in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology17: 13-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1989. A Tale of Three Cities: The Correspondence of William Sharpey and Allen Thomson. London: Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacyna, L. S. 2000. “ 'A host of Experienced Microscopists': The Establishment of Histology in Nineteenth-century Edinburgh.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine75: 225-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Caroline A. and Peter Galison (eds.). 1998. Picturing Science Producing Art. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölliker, Albrecht von. 1852. Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen für Aerzte und Studirende. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1853-1844. Manual of Human Histology, 2 Vols. London: Sydenham Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruta, Vladislav and Mikulas Teich. 1962. Jan Evangelista Purkyně. Prague: State Medical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruta, Vladislav. 1969. J.E. Purkyně (1787-1869), Physiologist: A Short Account of his Contributions to the Progress of Physiology with a Bibliography of his Works. Prague: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Christopher and Steven Shapin (eds.). 1998. Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

  • Levere, Trevor H. 1996. “Romanticism, Natural Philosophy, and the Sciences: A Review and Bibliographical Essay.” Perspectives on Science4: 463-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Richard. 1894. The Life of Richard Owen, 2 Vols. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbock, Philip F. 1983. The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-Century British Biology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, Nicolaas A. 1994. Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. University of Chicago Press.

  • -- 1995. “Cordelia's Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science.” Perspectives on Science3: 255-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press.

  • Sharpey, William. 1830. “On the Mechanism of Respiration in Certain Aquatic Animals.” Edinburgh Journal of Natural and Geographical Science2: 334-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- 1835. “Account of the Discovery by Purkinje and Valentin of Ciliary Motion in Reptiles and Warm-blooded Animals, with Remarks, and Additional Experiments.” Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal19: 114-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Allen. 1856. “Memoir of Dr. Martin Barry.” Edinburgh Medical Journal1: 87-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Robert Bentley. 1839-1847. The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology, 6 Vols. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin, G. 1843. Repertorium für Anatomie und Physiologie. Bern: von Huber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacyna, L. Moral Fibre: The Negotiation of Microscopic Facts in Victorian Britain. Journal of the History of Biology 36, 39–85 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022532313285

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022532313285

Navigation