Abstract
In reservoir characterization, the covariance is often used to describe the spatial correlation and variation in rock properties or the uncertainty in rock properties. The inverse of the covariance, on the other hand, is seldom discussed in geostatistics. In this paper, I show that the inverse is required for simulation and estimation of Gaussian random fields, and that it can be identified with the differential operator in regularized inverse theory. Unfortunately, because the covariance matrix for parameters in reservoir models can be extremely large, calculation of the inverse can be a problem. In this paper, I discuss four methods of calculating the inverse of the covariance, two of which are analytical, and two of which are purely numerical. By taking advantage of the assumed stationarity of the covariance, none of the methods require inversion of the full covariance matrix.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ababou, R., Bagtzoglou, A. C., and Wood, E. F., 1994, On the condition number of covariance matrices in kriging, estimation, and simulation of random fields: Math. Geology, v. 26,no. 1, p. 99–133.
Bracewell, R. N., 1978, The fourier transform and its applications, 2nd edn.: McGraw-Hill, New York, 444 p.
Chave, A. D., 1983, Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion: Geophysics, v. 48,no. 12, p. 1671–1686.
Chung, C. B., and Kravaris, C., 1990, Incorporation of a Priori Information in Reservoir History Matching by Regularization: unpublished manuscript, SPE-21615, available from the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas, 42 p.
Eddington, A. S., 1913, On a formula for correcting statistics for the effects of a known probable error of observation: Monthly Notices Roy. Astronom. Soc., v. 73, p. 359–360.
Fröberg, C.-E., 1965, Introduction to numerical analysis, 2nd edn.: Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 433 p.
Hohlfeld, R. G., King, J. I. F., Drueding, T. W., and Sandri, G. v. H., 1993, Solution of convolution integral equations by the method of differential inversion: SIAM Jour. Appl. Math., v. 53,no. 1, p. 154–167.
King, P. R., and Smith, P. J., 1988, Generation of correlated properties in heterogeneous porous media: Math. Geology, v. 20,no. 7, p. 863–877.
Lukas, M. A., 1980, Regularization, in Anderrsen, R. S., de Hoog, F. R., and Lukas, M. A., eds., The application and numerical solution of integral equations: Sijthoff & Noordhoff International, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, p. 151–182.
Murthy, A. S. V., 1995, A note on the differential inversion method of Hohlfeld et al.: SIAM Jour. Appl. Math., v. 55,no. 3, p. 719–722.
Oldenburg, D. W., McGillivray, P. R., and Ellis, R. G., 1993, Generalized subspace methods for large-scale inverse problems: Geophys. J. Int., v. 114, p. 12–20.
Oliver, D. S., He, N., and Reynolds, A. C., 1996, Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data, in Heinemann, Z. E., and Kriebernegg, M., eds., Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery: Mining University Leoben, Austria, p. 259–269.
Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 613 p.
Whittle, P., 1954, On stationary processes in the plane: Biometrika, v. 41, p. 434–449.
Wolfram, S., 1996, Mathematica, 3rd ed: Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL, 1395 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliver, D.S. Calculation of the Inverse of the Covariance. Mathematical Geology 30, 911–933 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021734811230
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021734811230