Skip to main content
Log in

Survival Models of Community Tenure and Length of Hospital Stay for the Seriously Mentally Ill: A 10-year Perspective

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of personal and community characteristics, specifically race and rurality, on lengths of state psychiatric hospital and community stays using maximum likelihood survival analysis with a special emphasis on change over a ten year period of time.

Data Sources: We used the administrative data of the Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS) from 1982–1991 and the Area Resources File (ARF). Given these two sources, we constructed a history file for each individual who entered the state psychiatric system over the ten year period. Histories included demographic, treatment, and community characteristics.

Study Design: We used a longitudinal, population-based design with maximum likelihood estimation of survival models. We presented a random effects model with unobserved heterogeneity that was independent of observed covariates. The key dependent variables were lengths of inpatient stay and subsequent length of community stay. Explanatory variables measured personal, diagnostic, and community characteristics, as well as controls for calendar time.

Data Collection: This study used secondary, administrative, and health planning data.

Principal Findings: African-American clients leave the community more quickly than whites. After controlling for other characteristics, however, race does not affect hospital length of stay. Rurality does not affect length of community stays once other personal and community characteristics are controlled for. However, people from rural areas have longer hospital stays even after controlling for personal and community characteristics. The effects of time are significantly smaller than expected. Diagnostic composition effects and a decrease in the rate of first inpatient admissions explain part of this reduced impact of time. We also find strong evidence for the existence of unobserved heterogeneity in both types of stays and adjust for this in our final models.

Conclusions: Our results show that information on client characteristics available from inpatient stay records is useful in predicting not only the length of inpatient stay but also the length of the subsequent community stay. This information can be used to target increased discharge planning for those at risk of more rapid readmission to inpatient care. Correlation across observed and unobserved factors affecting length of stay has significant effects on the measurement of relationships between individual factors and lengths of stay. Thus, it is important to control for both observed and unobserved factors in estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T. Costigan and J. Klein, “Multivariate survival analysis based on frailty models,” A. Basu, Ed., Advances in Reliability, New York: North-Holland, pp. 43–58, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Cox, “Regression models and life tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 34, pp. 187–220, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Elbers and G. Ridder, “True and spurious duration dependence: the identifiability of the proportional hazard model,” Review of Economic Studies, 49(3), pp. 403–410, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Fisher, J. L. Geller, F. Altaffer and M. B. Bennett, “The relationship between community resources and state hospital recidivism,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(3), pp. 385–390, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Gordon, “Cure mixture models in breast cancer survival studies,” In N. Jewell, A. Kimber, M. Lee and G. Whitmore, Eds., Lifetime Data: Models in Reliability and Survival Analysis, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 107–112, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Hafemeister and S. M. Banks, “Methodological advances in the use of recidivism rates to assess mental health treatment programs,” The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23(2), pp. 190–206, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Heckman and B. Singer, “A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data,” Econometrica, 52(2), pp. 271–320, 1984a.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Heckman and B. Singer, “Social science duration analysis,” in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, J. Heckman and B. Singer, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Holt, E. Merwin, S. Stern, “The lengths of psychiatric hospital stays and community stays,” Virginia Economic Journal, 6:1–25.

  • P. Hougaard, “Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: distributions describing the heterogeneity,” Biometrika, 71( 1), pp. 75–83, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “A class of multivariate failure time distributions,” Biometrika, 73( 3), pp. 671–678, 1986a.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions,” Biometrika, 73, pp. 387–396, 1986b.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Hougaard, “Modelling multivariate survival,” Scandanavian Statistical Journal, 14, pp. 291–304, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lancaster, The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Leginski, R. W. Manderscheid and P. R. Henderson, “Patients served in state mental hospitals: results from a longitudinal data base,” in NIMH, Mental Health, United States 1990, R. W. Manderscheid and M. A. Sonnenschein, Eds., DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)90–1708, Washington, D.C.: Supt. of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Lillard, “Simultaneous equations for hazards: marriage duration and fertility timing,” Journal of Econometrics, 56, pp. 189–217, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Meyer, “Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells,” Econometrica, 58(4), pp. 757–782, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Rosenstein, L. J. Milazzo-Sayre and R. W. Manderscheid, “Characteristics of persons using specialty inpatient, outpatient, and partial care programs in 1986,” in NIMH, Mental Health, United States 1990, R. W. Manderscheid and M. A. Sonnenschein, Eds., DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)90–1708, Washington, D.C.: Supt. of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sickles and P. Taubman, “An analysis for the health and retirement status of the elderly,” Econometrica, 54(6), pp. 1339–1356, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Vaupel, K. Manton and E. Stallard, “The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality,” Demography, 16, pp. 439–454, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Witkin, J. E. Atay, A.S. Fell and R. W. Manderscheid, “Specialty mental health system characteristics,” in NIMH, Mental Health, United States 1990, R. W. Manderscheid and M. A. Sonnenschein, Eds., DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)90–1708, Washington, D.C.: Supt. of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, S., Merwin, E. & Holt, F. Survival Models of Community Tenure and Length of Hospital Stay for the Seriously Mentally Ill: A 10-year Perspective. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 2, 117–135 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020154012982

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020154012982

Navigation