Skip to main content
Log in

James D. McCawley, Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. James F. Allen, Henry A. Kautz, Richard Pelavin, and Joshua Tennenberg (eds.), Reasoning About Plans, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alan Anderson and Nuel D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment, volume 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert J. Aumann, ‘Agreeing to disagree’, Annals of Statistics 4(6):1236–1239, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Binmore, Essays on the Foundations of Game Theory, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alonzo Church, ‘On Carnap's analysis of statements of assertion and belief,’ Analysis 10:97–99, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herbert Clark, Arenas of Language Use, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jon Doyle and Ramesh Patil, ‘Two theses of knowledge representation: Language restrictions, taxonomic classifications, and the utility of representation services’, Artificial Intelligence 48(3):261–298, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin Gardner, Puzzles From Other Worlds, Viking Press, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Geanakoplos, ‘Common knowledge’, in Yoram Moses (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference (TARK 1992), p. 254–315, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph Y. Halpern and Ronald Fagin, ‘Modelling knowledge and action in distributed systems’, Distributed Computing 3(4):159–179, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Harel, ‘Dynamic logic’, in Dov Gabbay and Franz Guenther (ed.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, p. 497–604, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaakko Hintikka, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaakko Hintikka, ‘Reasoning about knowledge in philosophy: The paradigm of epistemic logic’, in Joseph Y. Halpern (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the First Conference, p. 63–80, Los Altos, California, 1986. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. A. R. Hoare, Communicating Sequential Processes, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Phillipe Lamarre and Yoav Shoham, ‘Knowledge, certainty, belief, and conditionalization’, in J. Doyle, E. Sandewall, and P. Torasso (eds.), KR'94: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, p. 415–424. Morgan Kaufmann, 1994.

  16. Armin Laux and Heinrich Wansing (eds.), Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, Akedemie Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hector J. Levesque and Ronald J. Brachman, ‘A fundamental tradeoff in KR and reasoning’, in Ronald J. Brachman and Hector J. Levesque (eds.), Readings in Knowledge Representation, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. David K. Lewis, Convention: A Philosophical Study, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Milner, A Calculus of Communicating Systems, number 92 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephen Morris and Hyun Song Shin, ‘Approximate common knowledge and coordination: Recent lessons from game theory’, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 6(2):171–190, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoram Moses, ‘Knowledge and communication’, in Yoram Moses (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference (TARK 1992), p. 1–14, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Philip Reny, ‘Common knowledge and games with perfect information’, in Arthur Fine and Janet Leplin (eds.), PSA 1988: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, p. 363–369, East Lansing, Michigan, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. William A. Woods and James G. Schmolze, ‘The kl-one family’, in Fritz Lehmann (ed.), Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, p. 133–177, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. James, W., and C. Mortensen, [1997], Categories, Sheaves, and Paraconsistent Logic, The University of Adelaide.

  2. Mortensen, C., [1995], Inconsistent Mathematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James D. McCawley, Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic. Studia Logica 63, 121–150 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017201505279

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017201505279

Keywords

Navigation