Abstract
This note examines two recent judgements of theEnglish Court of Appeal, Re S.L. and ReA., concerning the sterilisation of a womanand a man with learning disabilities. The casesare significant for health care lawyers in thatthey effect a reworking of the common lawdoctrine of necessity, which serves as thelegal justification for providing medicaltreatment to adults lacking capacity to giveconsent. The cases are also significant forfeminist scholars engaged in the project of`sexing' the subjects of legal discourse (forexample, Naffine and Owens, 1997). Thejudgments of Re S.L. and Re A.,consistent with earlier sterilisation cases,fail to offer a conception of learning disabledsubjects as `sexed'.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Brown, H., “ 'An Ordinary Sexual Life': A Review of the Normalisation Principle as it Applies to the Sexual Options of People with Learning Disabilities”, Disability and Society 9/2 (1994), 123-144.
Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (London: Routledge, 1990).
Butler, J., “Sex” (London: Routledge, 1993).
Carson, D., “Disabling Progress: The Law Commission' Proposals on Mentally Incapacitated Adults' Decision-Making”, Journal of Social, Welfare and Family Law 5 (1993), 304-320.
Gatens, M., Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality (London: Routledge, 1996).
Grosz, E., Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994).
Horan, R.F.,Beitins, I.Z. andBode, H.H., “LH-RH Testing in Men with Down' Syndrome”, Acta Endocrinologica 88/3 (1978), 594-600.
Keywood, K., “Sterilising the Woman with Learning Difficulties: In Her Best Interests?”, in Law and Body Politics, Regulating the Female Body, ed. J. Bridgeman andS. Millns (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1995), 125-150.
Keywood, K., “My Body and Other Stories: Anorexia Nervosa and the Legal Politics of Embodiment”, Social and Legal Studies 9/4 (2000), 495-513.
Keywood, K., “Disabling Sex: Some Legal Thinking About Sterilisation, Disability and Embodiment”, in Well Women: The Gendered Nature of Health Care Provision, ed. A. Morris andS. Nott (Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth, 2001, forthcoming).
Naffine, N. andOwens, R. (eds.), Sexing the Subject of Law (Sydney: L. B.C., 1997).
Scior, K., “Women with Learning Disabilities: Gendered Subjects After All?”, Clinical Psychology Forum 137 (2000), 6-10.
Sheldon, S., Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law (London: Pluto Press, 1997).
Sheldon, S., “'A Responsible Body of Medical Men Skilled in That Particular Art ...': Rethinking the Bolam Test”, in Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Law, ed. S. Sheldon andM. Thomson (London: Cavendish, 1998), 15-32.
Shepperdson, B., “The Control of Sexuality in Young People With Down' Syndrome”, Child Health and Development 21/5 (1995), 333-349.
Shepperdson, B., Growing Up with Down' Syndrome (London: Cassell Educational, 1988).
Sheridan R.,Llerena, J.,Matkins, S.,Debenham, P.,Cawood, A. andBobrown, M., “Fertility in a Male with Trisonomy 21”, Journal of Medical Genetics 29 (1989), 294-298.
Thomson, M., Reproducing Narratives: Gender, Reproduction and Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keywood, K. ``I'd Rather Keep Him Chaste.'' Retelling the Story of Sterilisation, Learning Disability and (Non)Sexed Embodiment. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 185–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016748806196
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016748806196