Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Model for Simulation of Solute Transport in a Stream–Aquifer System

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model for simulation of solute transport in a dynamic stream–aquifer system is developed by integrating four existing sub-models. Interface packages are created to link the sub-models. The developed model is successfully used to simulate chloride transport in the stream–aquifer system of the Arkansas River and the Equus Beds Aquifer in Kansas and demonstrates that chloride concentration in the aquifer decreases in the vicinity of the simulated channel over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.L. Baker, K.L. Campbell, H.P. Johnson and J.J. Hanway, Nitrate, phosphorus, and sulfate in subsurface drainage water, J. Environ. Qual. 4 (1975) 406–412.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.D. Buhler, G.W. Randall, W.C. Koskinen and D.L. Wyse, Atrazine and alachlor losses from subsurface tile drainage of a clay loam soil, J. Environ. Qual. 22 (1993) 583–588.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bureau of Reclamation, Modeling of chloride transport in the Equus Beds Aquifer, Arkansas River Water Management Study, technical report (1993).

  4. C.R. Dietrich and A.J. Jakeman, Solute transport in a stream–aquifer system: 1. Derivation of a dynamic model, Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989) 2171–2176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Faidi, Development of a model for simulation of solute transport in a stream–aquifer system, Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.R. Fisher, E.J. List, C.Y.R. Koh, J. Imberger and N.H. Brooks, Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters (Academic Press, Inc, Orlando, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.J. Gburek and G.J. Folmer, Flow and chemical contributions to streamflow in an upland watershed: A base flow survey, J. Hydrol. 217 (1999) 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.R. Hallberg, Overview of agricultural chemicals in ground water, in: Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water (National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH, 1986) pp. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.R. Hallberg, Nitrates in ground water in Iowa, in: Rural Ground Water Contamination, eds. F.M. D'Itri and L.G. Wolfson (Chelsea, Michigan, 1987) pp. 23–68.

  10. G.R. Hallberg, Pesticide pollution of ground water in the humid United States, Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 26 (1989) 299–367.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.R. Hallberg, J.L. Baker and G.W. Randall, Utility of tile-line effluent studies to evaluate the impact of agricultural practices on ground water, in: Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water (National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH, 1986) pp. 298–328.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.W. Harbaugh and M.G. McDonald, User's Documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model, U.S.G.S. Open File Report 96-485 (1996).

  13. A.W. Harbaugh and M.G. McDonald, Programmer's Documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to U.S. geological Survey Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Model, U.S.G.S. Open File Report 96-486 (1996).

  14. A.J. Jakeman, C.R. Dietrich and G.A. Thomas, Solute transport in a stream–aquifer system: 2. Application of model identification to the River Murray, Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989) 2177–2185.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.B. Jaynes, J.L.Hatfield and D.W. Meek,Water quality in theWalnut Creek watershed: Herbicides and nitrate in surface waters, J. Environ. Qual. 28 (1999) 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.J. Kalkhoff, Relation between stream–water quality and geohydrology during base-flow conditions, Roberts Creek watershed, Clayton County, Iowa, Water Resour. Bull. 31 (1995) 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.R. Keeney, Sources of nitrate to ground water, Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 16 (1986) 257–304.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.W. Kolpin, J.E. Barbash and R.J. Gilliom, Occurrence of pesticides in shallow ground water of the United States: Initial results from the national water-quality assessment program, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 558–566.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.C. Linefield and T.O. Barnwell, Jr., The enhanced stream water quality models, QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: documentation and user manual, Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.G. McDonald and A.W. Harbaugh, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Groundwater Flow Model, Vol. 6 (U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, 1988) Chapter A1.

  21. N.C. Myers, G.D. Hargadine and J.B. Gillspie, Hydrologic and chemical interaction of the Arkansas River and the Equus Beds Aquifer between Hutchinson and Wichita, south central Kansas, U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resource Investigation Report 95-4191 (1996).

  22. D.E. Prudic, Documentation of a Computer Program to Simulate Stream–Aquifer Relations Using a Modular, Finite-Difference, Groundwater Model, U.S.G.S. Open File Report 88-729 (1989).

  23. L.J. Puckett, Identifying the major sources of nutrient water pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 (1995) 408–414.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R.W. Schaffranek, R.A. Baltzer and D.E. Goldberg, A Model for Simulation of Flow in Singular and Interconnected Channels, Vol. 7 (U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, 1981) Chapter C3.

  25. W.B. Solley, R.R. Pierce and H.A. Perlman, Estimated water use in the United States in 1990, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1081 (1993).

  26. P.J. Squillace, E.M. Thurman and E.T. Furlong, Ground water as a nonpoint source of atrazine and deethylatrazine in a river during base flow conditions, Water Resour. Res. 29 (1993) 1719–1729.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P.J. Squillace, J.P. Caldwell, P.M. Schulmeyer and C.A. Harvey, Movement of agrichemicals between surface water and ground water, Lower Cedar River, Basin, Iowa, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2448 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  28. E.D. Swain and E.J. Wexler, A Coupled Surface-Water and Ground-Water FlowModel (MODBRANCH) for Simulation of Stream–Aquifer Interaction, Vol. 6 (U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, 1996) Chapter A6.

  29. E.M. Thurman, D.A. Goolsby, M.T. Meyer and D.W. Koplin, Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States – The effect of spring flush, Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (1991) 1794–1796.

    Google Scholar 

  30. USGS, United States Geological Survey, Fact Sheet FS-244-95, National Water Quality Assessment Pesticide National Synthesis Project (1999).

  31. C. Zheng, A modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems, Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency (1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faidi, H.A., Garcia, L.A. & Albertson, M.M. Development of a Model for Simulation of Solute Transport in a Stream–Aquifer System. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 7, 191–206 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016380806404

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016380806404

Navigation