Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective Diversity and Social Learning: A Cognitive Perspective for Understanding Institutional Behavior

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with a controversial problem in the economics of institutions: how do regularities emerge and evolve out of the social interaction of various agents? Referring to arguments developed in a previous work (Rizzello and Turvani 2000) in which the Austrian Economics' views about the spontaneous emergence of institutions is connected to and enriched by recent findings in the cognitive sciences, the authors here extend the institutional-cognitive approach by incorporating the social cognitive theory of Albert Bandura. Accordingly, rather than being described as ‘instruments’ for social coordination, institutions are depicted as ‘structures’ emerging from the subjective process of generation of knowledge within a social context. Institutional behavior, its emergence and evolution is thus anchored to the mechanisms creating subjective diversity and those producing social learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977a) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs ( NJ): Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977b) “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84: 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs ( NJ): Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989) “Social Cognitive Theory.” Annals of Child Development 6: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991a) “Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action.” Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development 1: 45–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991b) “Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 50(2): 248–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1981) Effetti perversi dell'azione sociale. Milan: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1987) “Norms As a Social Capital.” In: Radnitsky, G., and Bernholz, P. (eds.) Economic Imperialism. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A., and North, D. (1994) “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions.” Kyklos 47(1): 3 –31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1958) Experience and Nature. New York: Dover Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1952) The Sensory Order. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1963) “Rules, Perception and Intelligibility.” Proceedings of the British Academy XLVIII: 321–44.

  • Hodgson, G. (2000) “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 34(2): 317–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. (1991) Equilibrium and Evolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1963 [1883]) Problems of Sociology and Economics. Urbain: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1978 [1859]) On Liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1994) “Economic Performance Through Time.” American Economic Review 84(3): 359–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. (1968) “Competitive Equilibrium Under Uncertainty.” Econometrica 36: 31–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. (1999) The Economics of the Mind. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. (2000) “Economic Change, Subjective Perception and Institutional Evolution.” Metroeconomica 51(2): 127–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S., and Turvani, M. (2000) “Institutions Meet Mind: The Way out of an Impasse.” Constitutional Political Economy 11: 165–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. (2000) “Institutionalism Between the Wars.” Journal of Economic Issues 34: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. (1972) Epistemics and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. (1986) “The Evolution of Rules.” In: Langlois, R. (ed.) Economics as a Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvani, M. (2001) “Microfoundation of Knowledge Dynamics within the Firm.” Industry and Innovation 8(3): 309–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (2001) Rational choice vs. program-based behavior. Paper presented at the Workshop 'The nature and evolution of institutions', Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems, Jena.

  • Williamsom, O. E. (1994) “Visible and Invisible Governance.” American Economic Review (P&P) 84(2): 323–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2000) “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.” Journal of Economic Literature 38: 595–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1999) “Evolutionary Economics and Evolutionary Biology.” In: Koslowski, P. (ed.) Sociobiology and Bioeconomics. The Theory of Evolution in Biological and Economic Theory. Berlin: Spinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (2000) Social Cognitive Learning and Group Selection – A Game-theoretic Version of Hayek's Societal Evolution. Paper presented at the INEM–ASSA Session “Austrian Economics and Game Theory”. Boston. January 8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizzello, S., Turvani, M. Subjective Diversity and Social Learning: A Cognitive Perspective for Understanding Institutional Behavior. Constitutional Political Economy 13, 197–210 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015377903529

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015377903529

Keywords

Navigation