Abstract
Federal sentencing guidelines were enacted to reduce unwarranted disparities in sentencing. In this paper we examine the degree to which disparity in sentencing on the basis of race and ethnicity occurred in federal sentencing after the guidelines were implemented. We consider how much of the disparity is explained by offense-related factors as specified in the guidelines. We find that African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans receive relatively harsher sentences than whites and that these differentials are only partly explained by offense-related characteristics. We interpret our findings in light of attribution, uncertainty avoidance, and conflict theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Forces 38: 247-266.
Albonetti, C. (1997). Sentencing under the Federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenders, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review 31: 789-822.
Alschuler, A. (1991). The failure of sentencing guidelines: A plea for less aggregation. The University of Chicago Law Review 58: 901-951.
Becker, E. R. (1991). Flexibility and discretion available to the sentencing judge under the guideline regime. Federal Probation LV: 10-15.
Berk, R. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review 48: 386-98.
Bridges, G. S., and Conley, D. (1995). Racial Disproportionality in County Juvenile Ffacilities. Department of Social and Health Services, State of Washington, Olympia, WA.
Bridges, G. S., and Crutchfield, R. D. (1988). Law, social standing, and racial disparities in imprisonment. Social Forces 66: 699-724.
Bridges, G. S., Crutchfield, R. D., and Simpson, E. (1987). Crime, social structure, and criminal punishment: White and nonwhite rates of imprisonment. Social Problems 34: 345-361.
Bridges, G. S., and Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attribution stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review 63: 554-570.
Cavender, G. (1984). Justice, sanctioning, and the justice model. Criminology 22: 203-213.
Cicourel, A. (1968). The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. John Wiley, New York.
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., and Haritow, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology 100: 1261-1293.
Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology 100: 1157-1198.
Drass, K. A., and Spencer, J. W. (1987). Accounting for pre-sentencing recommendations: Typologies and probation officers' theory of office. Social Problems 34: 277-293.
Everett, R. S., and Nienstedt, B. C. (1999). Race, remorse and sentence reduction: Is saying you're sorry enough. Justice Quarterly 16: 99-122.
Feeley, M. M., and Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30: 449-474.
Hagan, J., and Peterson, R. (1995). Crime and Inequality. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Hagan, J. (1974). Extra legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law and Society Review 8: 357-383.
Heaney, G. W. (1991). The reality of guidelines sentencing: No end to disparity. American Criminal Law Review 28: 161-232.
Kramer, J. H., Lubitz, R. L., and Kempinen, C. A. (1989). Sentencing guidelines: A quantitative comparison of sentencing policies in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Justice Quarterly 6: 565-587.
Kramer, J. H., and Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly 34: 357-376.
Kramer, J. H., and Ulmer, J. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly 13: 81-105.
Mann, C. R. (1993). Unequal Justice: A Question of Color. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest.
Maxfield, L. D., and Kramer, J. H. (1998). Substantial Assistance: An Empirical Yardstick Gauging Equity in Current Federal Policy and Practice. United States Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
Miethe, T., and Moore, C. (1985). Socioeconomic disparities under determinate sentencing systems: A comparison of preguidline and postguideline practices in Minnesota. Criminology 23: 337-363.
Miethe, T., and Moore, C. (1988). Officials reactions to sentencing guidelines. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25: 170-187.
Moore, C., and Miethe, T. (1986). Regulated and unregulated sentencing decisions: An analysis of first-year practices under Minnesota's felony sentencing guidelines. Law and Society Review 20: 253-277.
Morris, N., and Tonry, M. (1990). Between Prison and Probation. Oxford University Press, New York.
Myers, S. L., Jr. (1993). Racial disparities in sentencing: Can sentencing reforms reduce discrimination in punishment. Colorado Law Review 64: 781-808.
Nagel, I. H. (1990). Structured sentencing discretion: The new Federal sentencing guidelines. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 80: 883-943.
Nagel, I. H., and Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review 66: 501-566.
Peterson, R., and Hagan, J. (1984). Changing conceptions of race: Towards an account of anomalous findings in sentencing research. American Sociological Review 49: 56-70.
Quinney, R. (1973). Critique of the Legal Order: Crime Control in a Capitalist Society. Little Brown, Boston.
Reitz, K. R. (1993). Sentencing reform in the States: An overview of the Colorado Law Review Symposium. Colorado Law Review 64: 645-654.
Schulhofer, S. J., and Nagel, I. H. (1989). Negotiated pleas under the federal sentencing guidelines: The first fifteen months. American Criminal Law Review 27: 231-288.
Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System Criminal Justice 2000, Volume 3. National Institute of Justice.
Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial and judicial discretion. In Champion, D. J. (ed.), The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Implications for Criminal Justice, Praeger, New York.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J. H., and Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology 31: 411-416.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J. H., and Ulmer, J. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Criminal Justice Quarterly 12: 701-719.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., and Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology 36: 763-797.
Stolzenberg, L., and DeAlessio, S. J. (1994). Sentencing and uwarranted disparity: An empirical assessment of the long-term impact of sentencing guidelines in Minnesota. Criminology 32: 301-310.
Stolzenberg, R. M., and Relles, D. A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review 62: 494-507.
Tjoflat, G. B. (1991). The untapped potential for judicial discretion under the federal sentencing guidelines: Advice for counsel. Federal Probation LV: 4-15.
Tonry, M. (1995). Malign Neglect Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. Oxford University Press, New York.
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. Oxford University Press, New York.
Tonry, M., and Hatlestad, K. (1997). Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times: A Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.
Ulmer, J. T., and Kramer, J. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology 34: 383-408.
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. (1983). Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1983, Report No. 98-225. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1995). Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1991a). The Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Report on the Operation of the Guidelines System and Short-Term Impacts on Disparity in Sentencing, Use of Incarceration, and Prosecutorial Discretion and Plea Bargaining. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1991b). Guidelines Manual. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1987). Supplementary Report on the Initial Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Walker, S., Spohn, C., and Delone, M. (1996). The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Wilkins, W. W. (1992). Response to Judge Heaney. American Criminal Law Review 29: 795-821.
Wooldredge, J. D. (1998). Analytical rigor in studies of disparities in criminal case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 14: 155-179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Everett, R.S., Wojtkiewicz, R.A. Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18, 189–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015258732676
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015258732676