Skip to main content
Log in

Outsourcing of Services and the Productivity Recovery in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manufacturing productivity growth recovered during the 1980s and 1990s, while other sectors, particularly services, did not. In the same period U.S. manufacturing has engaged in the “outsourcing” or “contracting-out” of service functions. Has the recovery of manufacturing been accomplished by industrial reorganization--sloughing off sluggish services--rather than technical progress? We analyze this question by reducing service inputs to their consituent elements of material inputs. Service productivity growth is thus imputed to the goods sectors, reducing the recovery of manufacturing productivity growth in the 1980s by one fifth. The recovery lasted through the 1990s, when high productivity performers in manufacturing have been relatively successful at outsourcing sluggishservices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, K. G. (1990). “Restructuring the Employment Relationship: The Growth of Market Mediated Work Arrangements.” In K. G. Abraham and R. B. McKersie (eds.), New Developments in the Labor Market. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, K. G. and S. K. Taylor. (1993). “Firms' Use of Outside Contractors: Theory and Evidence.” NBER Working Paper No. 4468, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Barker, T. (1990). “Sources of Structural Change for the UK Service Industries 1979–84.” Economic Systems Research 2(2), 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. and O. Forssell. (1992). “Manufacturing, Services and Structural Change, 1979–1984.” In C. Driver and P. Dunne (eds.), Structural Change in the UK Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1967). “Microeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis.” American Economic Review 57(3), 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., S. A. B. Blackman and E. N. Wolff. (1989). Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. P. (1970). Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Economic Advisers. (1999). Economic Report of the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (ed.). (1992). Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, A. J. and S. W. Herman. (1997). “Improved Estimates of Fixed Reproducible Tangible Wealth, 1929–95.” Survey of Current Business, May, 69–92.

  • Kop Jansen, P. and T. ten Raa. (1990). “The Choice of Model in the Construction of Input-Output Coefficients Matrices.” International Economic Review 31(1), 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. M. and D. A. Teske. (1994). “Benchmark Input-Output Accounts for the U.S. Economy, 1987.” Survey of Current Business 74(4), 73–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1941). The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. (1967). “An Alternative to Aggregation in Input-Output Analysis and National Accounts.” Review of Economics and Statistics 49(3), 412–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postner, H. H. (1990). “The Contracting-Out Problem in Service Sector Analysis: Choice of Statistical Unit.” Review of Income and Wealth Series 36(2), 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, P. M. (1979). “The Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy, 1972, 11.” Survey of Current Business 59(2), 34–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, P. M., E. P. Roberts and P. C. Young. (1979). “Dollar Value Tables of the 1972 Input-Output Study.” Survey of Current Business 59(4), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. and Z. Griliches. (1992) “Purchased Services, Outsourcing, Computers, and Productivity in Manufacturing.” In Z. Griliches (ed.), Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1951). “The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” Journal of Political Economy 59.

  • ten Raa, T. (1995). Linear Analysis of Competitive Economies. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Raa, T. and E. N. Wolff. (1991). “Secondary Products and the Measurement of Productivity Growth.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 21(4), 581–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (1991). “Benchmark Input-Output Accounts for the U.S. Economy, 1982.” Survey of Current Business 71(7), 30–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Interindustry Economics Division. (1974). “The Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy: 1967.” Survey of Current Business 54(2), 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Interindustry Economics Division. (1984). “The Input-Output Structure of the U.S. Economy, 1977.” Survey of Current Business 64(5), 42–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. N. (1985). “Industrial Composition, Interindustry Effects and the U.S. Productivity Slowdown.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67, May, 268–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuskavage, R. E. (1985). “Employment and Employee Compensation in the 1977 Input-Output Accounts.” Survey of Current Business 65(11), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raa, T.t., Wolff, E.N. Outsourcing of Services and the Productivity Recovery in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Productivity Analysis 16, 149–165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011683310955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011683310955

Navigation