Skip to main content
Log in

"Denn Nach Welchem Bilde - ?"; Über den Bezug von Sein, Telos und Grammatik in Rilkes Spätwerk

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two cycles of Rilke's late work are evidently different but in Rilke's eyes they belong closely together. The essay is an attempt to determine the points these two cycles have in common. The universe of the Neue Gedichte was perfectly close, in the Requiem cycle he aims to open the universe. While the early created form was closed, individual and self-transcendent, after the turn, the created form is open, being ajusted to plural, out-standing and principally unreachable aims. In the law this adjustement the three late forms of Rilke's late poetry, the Elegien, the Sonette and the poems which do not belong to a cycle, coincide. Rilke followed his turn consequently, he even invented an own (a) grammatical case which we name lativus absolutus; this case penetrates the entire late work. Rilke also elaboretad a real theorem and this theorem is strikingly close to Klee's theoretical discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Por, P. "Denn Nach Welchem Bilde - ?"; Über den Bezug von Sein, Telos und Grammatik in Rilkes Spätwerk. Neohelicon 26, 189–230 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010989201181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010989201181

Keywords

Navigation