Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term trends in vegetation dominance and infaunal community composition in created marshes

  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An increase in salt marsh restoration efforts,especially over the last two decades, underscores theneed for effective methods to evaluate long-termsuccess. Most marsh restoration/creation efforts areonly evaluated over the first few years afterestablishment and in many cases only vegetativecharacteristics are examined. This study examinesvegetation as well as dominance and abundance patternsof benthic infauna at three created marsh sites ofvarying ages in Winyah Bay, South Carolina, and acreated marsh site in North Carolina, using data fromearlier studies and from sampling undertaken in 1998. Abundances fluctuated strongly between years, withpatterns of numerical abundance changing betweensites. In contrast, species dominance as measured bypercent occurrence tended to remain constant afterestablishment of a site. The same suite of specieswas dominant at all sites regardless of marsh age oryear of sampling. These results indicate that whilefaunal abundance is an important factor in determiningmarsh function (i.e., are higher trophic levelssupported?), dominance may be as useful in monitoringstability, especially in areas where the faunalassemblage is not closely tied to the vegetativecommunity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, T.D. and Hackney, C.T. 1987. A comparative study of the mollusc communities of two oligohaline intertidal marshes: Spatial and temporal distribution of abundance and biomass. Estuaries 10: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, S.W., Seneca, E.D. and Woodhouse, W.W. Jr. 1986. Longterm growth and development of transplants of the salt-marsh grass Spartina alterniflora. Estuaries 9: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammen, L.M., Seneca, E.D. and Copeland, B.J. 1976. Animal Colonization of Man-Initiated Salt Marshes on Dredge Spoil. Technical paper no. 76-7. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capehart, A.A. and Hackney, C.T. 1989. The potential role of roots and rhizomes in structuring salt marsh benthic communities. Estuaries 12: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R.S. and Ruppert, E.E. 1985. Shallow-Water Marine Benthic Macroinvertebrates of South Carolina. University of South Carolina Press, South Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, R.W. 1982. Guide to Common Tidal Marsh Invertebrates of the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Biloxi, Mississippi, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T. 1984. Patterns of invertebrate distribution and abundance in the intertidal salt marsh: Causes and questions. Estuaries 7: 392–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaSalle, M.W., Landin, M.C. and Sims, J.G. 1991. Evaluation of the flora and fauna of a Spartina alterniflora marsh established on dredged material in Winyah Bay, South Carolina. Wetlands: 191–208.

  • Levin, L.A., Talley, D. and Thayer, G. 1996. Succession of macrobenthos in a created salt marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 141: 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, L.A., Talley, T.S. and Hewitt, J. 1998. Macrobenthos of Spartina foliosa (Pacific cordgrass) salt marshes in Southern California: Community structure and comparison to a Pacific mudflat and a Spartina alterniflora (Atlantic smooth cordgrass) marsh. Estuaries 21: 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, A.M., Posey, M.H., Moser, M.L., Shank, G.C., McIver, M.R., Alphin, T.D. and Merritt, J.F. 1998. Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River system, 1997-1998. UNCW Press, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moy, L.D. and Levin, L.A. 1991. Are Spartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey, M.H., Alphin, T.D. and Powell, C.M. 1997. Plant and infaunal communities associated with a created marsh. Estuaries 20: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, J.N., Seneca, E.D. and Wentworth, T.R. 1994. Infaunal community development of artificially established salt marshes in North Carolina. Estuaries 17: 489–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simenstad, C.A. and Thom, R.M. 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Ecological Applications 6: 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streever, W.J. 2000. Spartina alterniflora marshes on dredged material: A critical review of the ongoing debate over success. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanyam, C.B., Kruczynski, W.L. and Drake, S.H. 1976. Studies on the animal communities in two north Florida salt marshes. Part II. Macroinvertebrate communities. Bulletin of Marine Science 26: 172–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, E.L. and Beatty, H.R. 1988. Macrobenthic communities from wetland impoundments and adjacent open marsh habitats in South Carolina. Estuaries 11: 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, W.W., Seneca, E.D. and Broome, S.W. 1972. Marsh Building with Dredge Spoil in North Carolina. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin # 445. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alphin, T.D., Posey, M.H. Long-term trends in vegetation dominance and infaunal community composition in created marshes. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8, 317–325 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008435319922

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008435319922

Navigation