Abstract
In the analysis of geographical spillovers, a commonly accepted hypothesis is that the different actors of innovation need to be physically closed to one another because the transfer of tacit knowledge implies frequent face-to-face relations. This hypothesis is put under closer examination in this paper. The first section analyses the need for economic agents to be closely located to develop research and innovative activities, starting with the analysis of their need for co-ordination and using some case studies. Based on the example of three French regions, the second section examines the importance given by the local development policies to geographical proximity in order to support the rapid development of local networks favouring innovation. In both sections, nonlocal relations appear as a key factor to develop innovation. As a conclusion, nonlocal relations should be encouraged by local development policies in the same way as local relations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K., 1962: Economic welfare and the allocation of ressources to invention. In: Nelson R., (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. NBER, Princeton UP.
Audretsch D. B. & M. P. Feldman, 1996: R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86: 630-640.
Autant-Bernard C. & N. Massard 1998: Econométrie des externalités technologiques locales et géographie de l'innovation. CREUSET, Université de Saint Etienne.
Cardon D. and C. Licoppe, 1997: Approches des usages en Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). CNET, Paris.
Feldman M. P., 1994: The Geography of Innovation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Foray D. and B. A. Lunvall 1996: The Knowledge-Based Economy. From the Economics of Knowledge to the Learning Economy. Paris, OCDE, pp. 11-34.
Garton L. and B. Wellman 1995: Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organisations: A Review of Literature. Communication Yearbook 18: 434-453.
Hägerstrand T., 1967: Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Hatchuel A. and B. Weil 1995: Experts in Organisations. De Gruyter, New York.
Jaffé A., 1989: Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review 75: 957-970.
Jaffé A. B., Trajtenberg M. and R. Henderson, 1993: Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quaterly Journal of Economics 108: 557-598.
Lundvall B.A. (ed.), 1992: National Systems of Innovation. Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 45-68.
Nonaka I., 1994: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5: 14-37.
Polanyi M., 1966: The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan, London.
Wellman B., Salaff J. Dimitrova, D., Garton L., Gulia M. and C. Haythornthwaite, 1996: Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 213-238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rallet, A., Torre, A. Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy?. GeoJournal 49, 373–380 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007140329027
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007140329027