Abstract
In the period 1875–1920, a debate about the generality and applicability of evolutionary theory to all organisms was motivated by work on unicellular ciliates like Paramecium because of their peculiar nuclear dualism and life cycles. The French cytologist Emile Maupas and the German zoologist August Weismann argued in the 1880s about the evolutionary origins and functions of sex (which in the ciliates is not linked to reproduction), and death (which appeared to be the inevitable fate of lineages denied sexual conjugation), an argument rooted in the question of whether the ciliates and their processes where homologous to other cellular organisms. In the beginning of the twentieth century, this question of homology came to be less important as the ciliates were used by the British protozoologist Clifford Dobell and the American zoologist Herbert Spencer Jennings to study evolutionary processes in general rather than problems of development and cytology. For them, homology mattered less than analogy. This story illustrates two partially distinct problems in evolutionary biology: first, the question of whether all living things have common features and origins; and second, whether their history and current nature can be described by identical mechanisms. Where Maupas (contra Weismann) made the ciliates qualitatively the same as all other organisms in order to create a cohesive evolutionary theory for biology, Jennings and Dobell made them qualitatively different in order to achieve the same end.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balbiani, Edouard-Gérard. 1861. Récherches sur les phenomènes sexuels des infusoires. Paris: V. Masson et fils.
Bütschli, Otto. 1876 [reprinted 1887]. “Studien über die ersten Entwicklungsvorgange der Eizelle, die Zelltheilung und die Conjugation der Infusorien.” Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 10: 213-452.
—— 1882a. “Gedanken über Leben und Tod.” Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 64-67.
—— 1882b. [Letter to Weismann]. Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 378.
Child, C.M. 1915. Senescence and Rejuvenescence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Churchill, Frederick B. 1968. “August Weismann and a Break from Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 1: 91-112.
—— 1970. “Hertwig,Weismann, and the Meaning of Reduction Division Circa 1870.” Isis 61: 429-457.
—— 1987. “From Heredity Theory to Vererbung: The Transmission Problem, 1850-1915.” Isis 78: 337-364.
——1989. “The Guts of the Matter: Infusoria from Ehrenberg to Bütschli, 1838-1876.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 189-213.
Corliss, John O. 1989. “The Protozoon and the Cell: A Brief Twentieth-Century Overview.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 307-323.
Darwin, Charles. 1859 [reprinted 1964]. On the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dobell, Clifford. 1911. “The Principles of Protistology.” Archiv für Protistenkunde 23: 269-310.
Ehrenberg, Christian Gottfried.1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen: ein Blick in das tiefere organische Leben der Natur. Leipzig: L. Voss.
Engelmann, T.W. 1876. “Ueber Entwickelung und Fortpflanzung von Infusorien.” Morphologisches Jahrbuch 1: 573-635.
Haeckel, Ernst, 1873. “Zur Morphologie der Infusorien.” Jenaische Zeitschrift für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft 7: 516-560.
Hartmann, Max. 1920. “Otto Bütschli und das Befruchtungs-und Todproblem.” Die Naturwissenschaften 7: 555-558.
Jacobs, Natasha X. 1989. “From Unit to Unity: Protozoology, Cell Theory, and the New Concept of Life.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 215-242.
Jennings, Herbert Spencer. 1908a. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. I. The Fate of New Structural Characters in Paramecium, in Connection with the Problem of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters in Unicellular Organisms.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 5: 577-632.
—— 1908b. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. II. Heredity and Variation of Size and Form in Paramecium, with Studies of Growth, Environmental Action and Selection.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 47: 393-546.
—— 1911. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. III. Assortative Mating, Variability and Inheritance of Size, in the Conjugation of Paramecium.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 11: 1-134.
—— 1912. “Age, Death and Conjugation in the Light of Work on Lower Organisms.” Popular Science Monthly (June 1912): 563-577.
—— 1913. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. IV. The Effects of Conjugation in Paramecium.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 14: 279-391.
—— 1920. Life and Death, Heredity and Variation in Unicellular Organisms. Boston: Gorham Press.
Kingsland, Sharon E. 1991. “Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912.” Isis 82: 479-509.
Leeuwenhoek, Antony van. 1695. Arcana naturae detecta. Delphis Batavorum: apud Henricum a Krooneveld.
Maupas, Emile. 1883. “Contribution à l'étude morphologique et anatomique des infusoires ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 1: 427-664.
—— 1888. “Récherches expérimentales sur la multiplication des infusoires ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 6: 165-277.
—— 1889. “La rajeunissement karyogamique chez les ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 7: 149-517.
Minot, Charles Sedgwick. 1879. “Growth as a Function of Cells.” Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 20: 190-209.
—— 1884. “Death and Individuality.” Science 4: 398-400.
—— 1908 [reprinted 1979]. The Problem of Age, Growth, and Death. New York: Arno Press.
Mooney, Susan M. 1993. “The Evolution of Sex-Variation and Rejuvenescence in the 19th Century and Today.” Bioscience 43: 110-113.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1900. Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.
—— 1903. Evolution and Adaptation. New York: Macmillan.
Müller, O.F. 1786. Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina. Hauniæ: Typis N. Mölleri.
Provine, William B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richmond, Marsha L. 1989. “Protozoa as Precursors of Metazoa: German Cell Theory and its Critics at the Turn of the Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 243-276.
Rothschild, Lynn B. 1989. “Protozoa, Protista, Protoctista: What's in a Name?” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 277-306.
Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sargent, Edmond. 1955. “Émile Maupas, prince des protozoologistes.” Archives de l'Institut Pasteur d'Algérie 33: 59-70.
Théodoridès, Jean. 1981. “Maupas, François Émile.” In: Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. Charles Coulton Gillispie. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Weismann, August. 1882a. Ñber die Dauer des Lebens. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
—— 1882b. “Bemerkungen zu Professor Bütschli's 'Gedanken über Leben und Tod.'” Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 377-380.
—— 1884. Ñber Leben und Tod. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
—— 1886. Die Bedeutung der sexuellen Fortpflanzung für die Selektions-Theorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
——1892. Das Keimplasma. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
——1893. The Germ-Plasm. New York: Scribner.
——1904. The Evolution Theory. London: Edward Arnold.
Wilson, E. B. 1986. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York: Macmillan.
——1906. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
—— 1925. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 3d ed., rev. and enl. New York: Macmillan.
Woodruff, Lorande Loss. 1905. “An Experimental Study on the Life History of Hypotrichous Infusoria.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 2: 585-635.
—— 1911. “Two Thousand Generations of Paramecium.” Archiv für Protistenkunde 21: 263-266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lustig, A. Sex, Death, and Evolution in Proto- and Metazoa, 1876–1913. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 221–246 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740325150
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740325150