Skip to main content
Log in

Sex, Death, and Evolution in Proto- and Metazoa, 1876–1913

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the period 1875–1920, a debate about the generality and applicability of evolutionary theory to all organisms was motivated by work on unicellular ciliates like Paramecium because of their peculiar nuclear dualism and life cycles. The French cytologist Emile Maupas and the German zoologist August Weismann argued in the 1880s about the evolutionary origins and functions of sex (which in the ciliates is not linked to reproduction), and death (which appeared to be the inevitable fate of lineages denied sexual conjugation), an argument rooted in the question of whether the ciliates and their processes where homologous to other cellular organisms. In the beginning of the twentieth century, this question of homology came to be less important as the ciliates were used by the British protozoologist Clifford Dobell and the American zoologist Herbert Spencer Jennings to study evolutionary processes in general rather than problems of development and cytology. For them, homology mattered less than analogy. This story illustrates two partially distinct problems in evolutionary biology: first, the question of whether all living things have common features and origins; and second, whether their history and current nature can be described by identical mechanisms. Where Maupas (contra Weismann) made the ciliates qualitatively the same as all other organisms in order to create a cohesive evolutionary theory for biology, Jennings and Dobell made them qualitatively different in order to achieve the same end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balbiani, Edouard-Gérard. 1861. Récherches sur les phenomènes sexuels des infusoires. Paris: V. Masson et fils.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bütschli, Otto. 1876 [reprinted 1887]. “Studien über die ersten Entwicklungsvorgange der Eizelle, die Zelltheilung und die Conjugation der Infusorien.” Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 10: 213-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1882a. “Gedanken über Leben und Tod.” Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 64-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1882b. [Letter to Weismann]. Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, C.M. 1915. Senescence and Rejuvenescence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Frederick B. 1968. “August Weismann and a Break from Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 1: 91-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1970. “Hertwig,Weismann, and the Meaning of Reduction Division Circa 1870.” Isis 61: 429-457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1987. “From Heredity Theory to Vererbung: The Transmission Problem, 1850-1915.” Isis 78: 337-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1989. “The Guts of the Matter: Infusoria from Ehrenberg to Bütschli, 1838-1876.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 189-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, John O. 1989. “The Protozoon and the Cell: A Brief Twentieth-Century Overview.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 307-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1859 [reprinted 1964]. On the Origin of Species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobell, Clifford. 1911. “The Principles of Protistology.” Archiv für Protistenkunde 23: 269-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Christian Gottfried.1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen: ein Blick in das tiefere organische Leben der Natur. Leipzig: L. Voss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, T.W. 1876. “Ueber Entwickelung und Fortpflanzung von Infusorien.” Morphologisches Jahrbuch 1: 573-635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst, 1873. “Zur Morphologie der Infusorien.” Jenaische Zeitschrift für Medizin und Naturwissenschaft 7: 516-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Max. 1920. “Otto Bütschli und das Befruchtungs-und Todproblem.” Die Naturwissenschaften 7: 555-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Natasha X. 1989. “From Unit to Unity: Protozoology, Cell Theory, and the New Concept of Life.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 215-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Herbert Spencer. 1908a. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. I. The Fate of New Structural Characters in Paramecium, in Connection with the Problem of the Inheritance of Acquired Characters in Unicellular Organisms.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 5: 577-632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1908b. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. II. Heredity and Variation of Size and Form in Paramecium, with Studies of Growth, Environmental Action and Selection.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 47: 393-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1911. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. III. Assortative Mating, Variability and Inheritance of Size, in the Conjugation of Paramecium.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 11: 1-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1912. “Age, Death and Conjugation in the Light of Work on Lower Organisms.” Popular Science Monthly (June 1912): 563-577.

  • —— 1913. “Heredity, Variation and Evolution in Protozoa. IV. The Effects of Conjugation in Paramecium.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 14: 279-391.

  • —— 1920. Life and Death, Heredity and Variation in Unicellular Organisms. Boston: Gorham Press.

  • Kingsland, Sharon E. 1991. “Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912.” Isis 82: 479-509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenhoek, Antony van. 1695. Arcana naturae detecta. Delphis Batavorum: apud Henricum a Krooneveld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maupas, Emile. 1883. “Contribution à l'étude morphologique et anatomique des infusoires ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 1: 427-664.

  • —— 1888. “Récherches expérimentales sur la multiplication des infusoires ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 6: 165-277.

  • —— 1889. “La rajeunissement karyogamique chez les ciliés.” Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale (ser. 2) 7: 149-517.

  • Minot, Charles Sedgwick. 1879. “Growth as a Function of Cells.” Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 20: 190-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1884. “Death and Individuality.” Science 4: 398-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1908 [reprinted 1979]. The Problem of Age, Growth, and Death. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Susan M. 1993. “The Evolution of Sex-Variation and Rejuvenescence in the 19th Century and Today.” Bioscience 43: 110-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1900. Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903. Evolution and Adaptation. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, O.F. 1786. Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina. Hauniæ: Typis N. Mölleri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, William B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 1989. “Protozoa as Precursors of Metazoa: German Cell Theory and its Critics at the Turn of the Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 243-276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Lynn B. 1989. “Protozoa, Protista, Protoctista: What's in a Name?” Journal of the History of Biology 22: 277-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Edmond. 1955. “Émile Maupas, prince des protozoologistes.” Archives de l'Institut Pasteur d'Algérie 33: 59-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Théodoridès, Jean. 1981. “Maupas, François Émile.” In: Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. Charles Coulton Gillispie. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, August. 1882a. Ñber die Dauer des Lebens. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1882b. “Bemerkungen zu Professor Bütschli's 'Gedanken über Leben und Tod.'” Zoologischer Anzeiger 5: 377-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1884. Ñber Leben und Tod. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1886. Die Bedeutung der sexuellen Fortpflanzung für die Selektions-Theorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1892. Das Keimplasma. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1893. The Germ-Plasm. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1904. The Evolution Theory. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. 1986. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1906. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1925. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 3d ed., rev. and enl. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, Lorande Loss. 1905. “An Experimental Study on the Life History of Hypotrichous Infusoria.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 2: 585-635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1911. “Two Thousand Generations of Paramecium.” Archiv für Protistenkunde 21: 263-266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lustig, A. Sex, Death, and Evolution in Proto- and Metazoa, 1876–1913. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 221–246 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740325150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004740325150

Navigation