Skip to main content
Log in

Biocontrol activity of Burkholderia cepacia against Rhizoctonia solani in herbicide-treated soils

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biocontrol activity of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia (isolate D1) and Deny® (liquid and peat moss-based formulations of B. cepacia, CCT Corp., Carlsbad, CA) against Rhizoctonia solani-induced cotton seedling damping-off was measured in the presence of three pre-plant herbicides, pendimethalin, prometryn, and trifluralin in microcosms and in the field. In a pre-emergence damping-off microcosm experiment, the D1 soil drench increased the number of emerged seedlings significantly (P < 0.05), relative to the control (not treated with D1) in non-herbicide-treated soils and in soils treated with trifluralin. In a post emergence damping-off microcosm experiment, the D1 soil drench caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in seedling survival only in non-herbicide-treated soil and in soils treated with pendimethalin and trifluralin. In two field trials conducted at Safford and Tucson, the D1 soil drench increased cotton stand significantly (P < 0.05), relative to the control, in non-herbicide-treated plots and in plots treated with trifluralin. Cotton stand was significantly (P < 0.05) increased by Deny® soil drench only in non-herbicide-treated plots in Tucson field trial. Deny® seed treatment was inefficient in the presence or absence of the herbicides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman J and Campbell C L 1977 Pesticide-plant disease interactions. Effect of cycolate on sugar beet damping-off induced by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 67, 1163–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman J and Rovira A D 1989 Herbicide-pathogen interactions in soil-borne root diseases. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 11, 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas R M, Pramer D and Bartha, R 1978 Assessment of pesticide effect on non-target soil microorganisms. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 10, 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull C T, Weller D M and Thomashow L S 1991 Relationship between root colonization and suppression of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 2–79. Phytopathology 81, 954–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell C L and Altman J 1977 Pesticide-plant disease interactions: effect of cycolate on growth of Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 67, 557–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R J and Baker K F 1983 The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. APS Press, St. Paul, MN. 539 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon J W and Berry L A 1993 Biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens: Concepts and their applications. Pestic. Sci. 37, 417–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elad Y and Misaghi I J 1985 Biochemical aspects of plant-microbe and microbe-microbe interactions in soil. In: Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. Vol. 19, pp 21–46. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshanshoury A E R, Abuelsououd S M, Awadalla O A and Elbandy N B 1996 Effects of Streptomyces corchorusii, Streptomyces mutabilis, pendimethalin, and metribuzin on the control of bacterial and Fusarium wilt of tomato. Can. J. Bot. 74, 1016–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfors S O and Molin G 1980 Effects of high concentration of carbon dioxide on growth rate of Pseudomonas fragi, Bacillus cereus, and Streptococcus cremoris. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 49, 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippi C, Bagnoli G, Volterrani M and Picci G 1987 Antagonistic effects of soil bacteria on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi (Prill and Dell). Synd. And Hans. III. Relation between protection against Fusarium wilt in carnation and bacterial antagonists colonization on roots. Plant Soil 98, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlani G, Mantelli M, Branzoni M, Nielsen E and Favilli F 1995 Differential sensitivity of plant-associated bacteria to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Plant Soil 176, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves M P and Sargent J A 1986 Herbicide-induced microbial invasion of plant roots. Weed Sci. 34, 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn C, Gould W D and Bardinelli T R 1993 Field evaluations of bacterial inoculants to control seedling diseses on cotton. Plant Dis. 77, 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydari A, Misaghi I J and McCloskey W B 1997 Effects of three soil applied herbicides on populations of plant disease suppressing bacteria in the cotton rhizosphere. Plant Soil 195, 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell C R 1982 Effect of Gliocladium virens on Pythium ultimum, Rhizoctonia solani and damping-off of cotton seedlings. Phytopathology 72, 496–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim D H and Misaghi I J 1996 Biocontrol performance of two isolate of Pseudomonas fluorescens in modified soil atmospheres. Phytopathology 86, 1238–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger J P, Butz R G and Cork D J 1991 Use of Dicamba-degrading microorganisms to protect dicamba susceptible plant species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39, 1000–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J A and Lumsden R D 1995 Do pathogenic fungi have the potential to inhibit biocontrol fungi? J. Phytopathol. (Berlin) 143, 585–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loper J E, Haack C and Schroth M N 1984 Population dynamics of soil Pseudomonads in the rhizosphere of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 416–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macauley B J and Griffin D M 1969 Effects of carbon dioxide and oxygen on the activity of some soil fungi. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 53, 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson P C 1996 Implementing IPM-policy and institutional revolution. J. Agric. Entomol. 13, 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misaghi I J, Olsen M W, Billotte J M and Sonoda R M 1992 The importance of rhizobacterial mobility in biocontrol of bacterial wilt of tomato. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman T B and Dowler C C 1991 Herbicide and rotation effect on soil and rhizosphere microorganisms and crop yield. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 35, 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudd P J, Greaves M P and Wright S J L 1985 Effect of isoproturon in the rhizosphere of wheat. Weed Res. 25, 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nema-Kosa S and Cserhati T 1995 Quantitative structure-activity relationship study on the inhibitory effect of some herbicides on the growth of some soil microorganisms. J. Appl. Bact. 79, 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pline M and Dusenbery D B 1987 Responses of plant parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita to carbon dioxide determined by video camera-computer tracking. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 873–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira A D and McDonald H J 1986 Effect of the herbicide chlorsulfuron on Rhizoctonia bare patch and take-all of barley and wheat. Plant Dis. 70, 879–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth M N and Hancock J G 1981 Selected topics in biocontrol. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 35, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller D M 1988 Biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 26: 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki K, Misaghi I J, Heydari A and Shatla M N 1998 Control of cotton seedling damping-off in the field by Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia. Plant Dis. 82: 291–293.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heydari, A., Misaghi, I. Biocontrol activity of Burkholderia cepacia against Rhizoctonia solani in herbicide-treated soils. Plant and Soil 202, 109–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004370810139

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004370810139

Navigation