Skip to main content
Log in

Correlates of vitamin supplement use in the United States: data from the California Teachers Study cohort

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with vitamin supplement use in a large cohort of adult women.

METHODS: California teachers and administrators (n = 133,479) completed a questionnaire on lifestyle factors and medical history. Specific supplement users regularly used at least one specific vitamin supplement in the past year; multivitamin users regularly used a multivitamin; and multivitamin and specific supplement users took a multivitamin and one or more specific supplements. Associations between supplement use and other variables were quantified using means, cross-tabulations, and age-adjusted prevalence odds ratios.

RESULTS: Multivitamin and specific supplement users tended to be older and Caucasian. Compared to non-users, they were also leaner (odds ratio [OR] for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 = 0.6 for specific supplement users with or without multivitamins, and OR = 0.7 for multivitamin only users), and were less likely to be current smokers (OR for current smoking = 0.8 for multivitamin plus specific supplement users, OR = 0.9 for secific supplement only users, and OR = 0.7 for multivitamin only users). Specific supplement users (with or without multivitamins) were more likely to use cancer screening tests, eat fruits and vegetables, and exercise than were multivitamin only users or non-users.

CONCLUSIONS: A variety of demographic, dietary, and health-related factors were associated with different categories of supplement use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harward MP (1993) Nutritive therapies for osteoporosis. The role of calcium. Med Clin North Am 77: 889–898.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rayburn WF, Stanley JR, Garrett ME (1996) Periconceptional folate intake and neural tube defects. J Am Coll Nutr 15: 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boushey CJ, Beresford SA, Omenn GS, Motulsky AG (1995) A quantitative assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease. Probable benefits of increasing folic acid intakes. JAMA 274: 1049–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hatchcock J (1997) Vitamins and minerals: efficacy and safety. Am J Clin Nutr 66: 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Block G, Sinha R, Gridley G (1994) Collection of dietarysupplement data and implications for analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 59: 232S-239S.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Slesinski MJ, Subar AF, Kahle LL (1995) Trends in use of vitamin and mineral supplements in the United State: the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys. J Am Diet Assoc 95: 921–923.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyle BJ, Mares-Perlman JA, Klein BE, Klein R, Greger JL (1998) Supplement users differ from nonusers in demographic, lifestyle, dietary and health characteristics. J Nutr 128: 2355–2362.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, White E, Hunt JR, Kristal AR (1998) Cancer-related behavior of vitamin supplement users. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subar AF, Block G (1990) Use of vitamin and mineral supplements: demographics and amounts of nutrients consumed. The 1987 Health Interview Survey. Am J Epidemiol 132: 1091–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Block G, Cox C, Madans J, Schreiber GB, Licitra L, Melia N (1988) Vitamin supplement use, by demographic characteristics. Am J Epidemiol 127: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein L, Allen M, Anton-Culver H, et al. (2002) High breast cancer rates among California teachers: Results from the California Teachers Study Cohort. Cancer Causes Control 13: 625–635.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L (1986) A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol 124: 453–469.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ervin RB, Wright JD, Kennedy-Stephenson J (1999) Use of dietary supplements in the United States, 1988–94. Vital Health Stat, Series 11 June; (244 ): i-iii, 1–14.

  14. Kato I, Dnistrian AM, Schwartz M, et al. (1999) Epidemiologic correlates of serum folate and homocysteine levels among users and non-users of vitamin supplement. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 69: 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newman V, Rock CL, Faerber S, Flatt SW, Wright FA, Pierce JP (1998) Dietary supplement use by women at risk for breast cancer recurrence. The Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study Group. J Am Diet Assoc 98: 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gray SL, Hanlon JT, Fillenbaum GG, Wall WE, Bales C (1996) Predictors of nutritional supplement use by the elderly. Pharmacotherapy 16: 715–720.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bender MM, Levy AS, Schucker RE, Yetley EA (1992) Trends in prevalence and magnitude of vitamin and mineral supplement usage and correlation with health status. J Am Diet Assoc 92: 1096–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray GE, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK (1983) Dietary intake and nutrient supplement use in a Southern California retirement community. Am J Clin Nutr 38: 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  19. White E, Shannon JS, Patterson RE (1997) Relationship between vitamin and calcium supplement use and colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6: 769–774.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoggatt, K., Bernstein, L., Reynolds, P. et al. Correlates of vitamin supplement use in the United States: data from the California Teachers Study cohort. Cancer Causes Control 13, 735–740 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020282927074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020282927074

Navigation