Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Damage Identification of Structures with Uncertainty Based on Dynamic Responses

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probabilistic damage identification problem with uncertainty in the FE model parameters, external-excitations and measured acceleration responses is studied. The uncertainty in the system is concerned with normally distributed random variables with zero mean value and given covariance. Based on the theoretical model and the measured acceleration responses, the probabilistic structural models in undamaged and damaged states are obtained by two-stage model updating, and then the Probabilities of Damage Existence (PDE) of each element are calculated as the damage criterion. The influences of the location of sensors on the damage identification results are also discussed, where one of the optimal sensor placement techniques, the effective independence method, is used to choose the nodes for measurement. The damage identification results by different numbers of measured nodes and different damage criterions are compared in the numerical example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ma, H.W. and Yang, G.T., Methods and advance of structural damage detection. Advances in Mechanics, 1999, 29(4): 513–527. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim, T.W., Structural damage detection using constrained eigenstructure assignment. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1995, 18(3): 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abo, M., Structural damage detection by natural frequencies. In: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, 37th. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Paper, Salt Lake City, 1996: 1064–1069.

  4. Parloo, E., Guillaume, P. and Overmeire, M.V., Damage assessment using mode shape sensitivities. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2003, 17(3): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, U. and Shin, J., A structural damage identification method for plate structures. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24: 1177–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng, X., Fing, Y.F. and Zhou, J., A flexibility-based method for damage localization of truss structures. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechianics, 2006, 23(5): 563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elishakoff, I., Three versions of the finite element method based on concepts of either stochasticity, fuzziness or anti-optimization. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1998, 51(3): 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papadopoulos, L. and Garcia, E., Structural damage identification: a probabilistic approach. AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(11): 2137–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xia, Y. and Hao, H., Statistical damage identification of structures with frequency changes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 263: 853–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, X.Y. and Law, S.S., Damage identification of structures including system uncertainties and measurement noise. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(1): 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meo, M. and Zumpano, G., On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure. Engineering Structures 2005, 27: 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S., Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 303(1–2): 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kammer, D.C. and Brillhart, R.D., Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1996, 19: 729–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heo, G., Wang, M.L. and Satpathi, D., Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1997, 16: 495–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imamovic, N., Model Validation of Large Finite Element Model Using Test Data. Ph.D. dissertation, Imperial College London, 1998.

  16. Doebling, S.W., Measurement of structural flexibility matrices for experiments with incomplete reciprocity. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado University, 1996.

  17. Larson, C.B., Zimmerman, D.C. and Marek, E.L., A comparison of modal test planning techniques: excitation and sensor placement using the NASA8-bay truss. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Modal Analysis Conference, 1994, 205–211.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojun Wang.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 11372025), the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (No. 2012ZA51010) and Defense Industrial Technology Development Program (Nos. A2120110001 and B2120110011).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Yang, C., Wang, L. et al. Probabilistic Damage Identification of Structures with Uncertainty Based on Dynamic Responses. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 27, 172–180 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(14)60027-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-9166(14)60027-6

Key Words

Navigation