Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Life Cycle Assessment on Single-Use and Reuse Beer Cups at Festivals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Circular Economy and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims at comparing the environmental performance of single-use and multiple use beer cups at festivals. A life cycle assessment is conducted for assessing the potential environmental impacts of 1000 servings of 0.5 l of beer at Norwegian festivals. Three single-use systems are considered: one with incineration, one with open loop recycling, and one with closed loop recycling. The two first single-use systems and the reuse system assume the use of PP cups, while the latter uses PET cups, as PET is the only plastic material which currently allows a closed loop recycling system. Existing literature has shown that the choice of system depends on several site-specific parameters such as the definition of the trip rate in a reuse system and on the festival participant’s behaviour. In this article, we calculate the trip rate in the reuse system based on the cup return rates, which varies between all systems. The return rate was calculated using empirical data for Norway’s largest festival. In addition, the recycling stage is modelled with both cut-off and system expansion for assessing the robustness of the results. To reduce environmental impacts related to the serving of beers, festivals are advised to get an overview of the flows of the cups after use, to measure and limit their waste, and to have good collection systems for handling the cups as intended. The results of this study show that this is more important than the choice of cup material. LCA practitioners should be cautious with the implications of the end-of-life modelling approach on the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The used data not presented in the paper is available from the authors upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hanke G (2016) Marine Beach Litter in Europe – Top Items A short draft summary. In: REPORTS, J. R. C. T. (ed.).

  2. UNEP (2021) Single-use beverage cups and their alternatives - recommendations from Life Cycle Assessments

  3. Joint Research Centre (2016) Harm caused by Marine Litter

  4. Kleiva Møller I, Comtet M, Rugaas MH (2019) Gjenbruksglass på festival - fra bruk og kast til bruk og vask. . In: PROSJEKTOPPGAVE (ed.). Handelshøyskolen BI

  5. Coelho PM, Corona B, Ten Klooster R, Worrell E (2020) Sustainability of reusable packaging–Current situation and trends. Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X, 6

  6. Mahmoudi M, Parviziomran I (2020) Reusable packaging in supply chains: a review of environmental and economic impacts, logistics system designs, and operations management. Int J Prod Econ, 228

  7. Amienyo D, Azapagic A (2016) Life cycle environmental impacts and costs of beer production and consumption in the UK. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:492–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Amienyo D, Gujba H, Stichnothe H, Azapagic A (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasqualino J, Meneses M, Castells F (2011) The carbon footprint and energy consumption of beverage packaging selection and disposal. J Food Eng 103:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simon B, Amor MB, Földényi R (2016) Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles. J Clean Prod 112:238–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Der Harst E, Potting J (2013) A critical comparison of ten disposable cup LCAs. Environ Impact Assess Rev 43:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Der Harst E, Potting J, Kroeze C (2014) Multiple data sets and modelling choices in a comparative LCA of disposable beverage cups. Sci Total Environ 494–495:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Almeida J, Bengtsson E (2018) Reusable coffee cups life cycle assessment and benchmark.

  14. CUPCLUB (2018) Join the reusable revolution: CupClub Sustainability Report 2018 A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of 12oz CupClub cup and lid

  15. Foteinis S (2020) How small daily choices play a huge role in climate change: the disposable paper cup environmental bane. J Clean Prod, 255

  16. VTT (2019) Taking a closer look at paper cups for coffee

  17. Woods L, Bakshi BR (2014) Reusable vs. disposable cups revisited: guidance in life cycle comparisons addressing scenario, model, and parameter uncertainties for the US consumer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:931–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Changwichan K, Gheewala SH (2020) Choice of materials for takeaway beverage cups towards a circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum 22:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vercalsteren A, Spirinckx C, Geerken T (2010) Life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis of drinking cups used at public events. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:221–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Garrido N, Alvarez Del Castillo MD (2007) Environmental evaluation of single-use and reusable cups. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Potting J, Van Der Harst E (2015) Facility arrangements and the environmental performance of disposable and reusable cups. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1143–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cottafava D, Costamagna M, Baricco M, Corazza L, Miceli D, Riccardo LE (2021) Assessment of the environmental break-even point for deposit return systems through an LCA analysis of single-use and reusable cups. Sustain Prod Consum 27:228–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tua C, Biganzoli L, Grosso M, Rigamonti L (2019) Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic crates (RPCs). Resources, 8

  24. Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, Van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework

  26. ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Magament - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and guidelines. International Standardisation Organisation

  27. Lyng KA, De Sadeleer I (2021) Environmental assessment of beer serving on festivals (in Norwegian only). NORSUS Norwegian Institute for Sustainability Research

  28. Allacker K, Mathieux F, Pennington D, Pant R (2017) The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1441–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergsma G, Sevenster M (2013) End-of-life best approach for allocating recycling benefits in LCAs of metal packaging.

  30. Ekvall T, Björklund A, Sandin G, Jelse K (2020) Modeling recycling in life cycle assessment. Swedish Life Cycle Center, Chalmers University of Technology Report no 2020.xx (DRAFT May 2020)

  31. Gala AB, Raugei M, Fullana-I-Palmer P (2015) Introducing a new method for calculating the environmental credits of end-of-life material recovery in attributional LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:645–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Green Dot Norway (2021) https://www.grontpunkt.no/gjenvinning/plastemballasje-fra-husholdninger/. Accessed 2021

  33. Syversen F, Lyng KA, Amland E, Bjørnerud S, Callewaert P, Prestrud K (2018) Utsortering og materialgjenvinning av biologisk avfall og plastavfall. https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/M1114/M1114.pdf. Accessed December 2020

  34. Raadal HL, Modahl IS, Iversen OM (2017) Comparison of recycling and incineration of aluminium cans. Ostfold Research, OR.07.17. https://norsus.no/wp-content/uploads/or-07-17-alu_final_201017.pdf. Accessed December 2020

  35. Civancik-Uslu D, Puig R, Ferrer L, Fullana-I-Palmer P (2019) Influence of end-of-life allocation, credits and other methodological issues in LCA of compounds: An in-company circular economy case study on packaging. J Clean Prod 212:925–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. European Commission, PEFCR Guidance document, - Guidance for the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), version 6.3, December 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf. Accessed March 2021

  37. Infinitum (2019) Vil øke andelen resirkulert plast fra 10 til 80 prosent [Online]. Available: https://infinitummovement.no/sirkulaeravgift-resirkulert-plast-i-flasker/ [Accessed 01.10 2020].

  38. Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1218–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Øyafestivalen for valuable information and Ola Haug and Anders Løland at the Norwegian Computing Centre for review and input regarding calculation of trip rates and number of reuse cups necessary to fulfil the functional unit.

Funding

The data for the alternatives assessed in this paper is based on a study which was commissioned by Øyafestivalen and funded by Handelens Miljøfond (the Norwegian Retailers’ Environmental Fund). The results from the first study were published in a report written in Norwegian only. The background data and the analysis have been developed further for the purpose of this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The paper is a common work of the authors that jointly conceptualised, planned and revised the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irmeline de Sadeleer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All figures were created by the authors and are aligned with a consent for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1359 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Sadeleer, I., Lyng, KA. A Life Cycle Assessment on Single-Use and Reuse Beer Cups at Festivals. Circ.Econ.Sust. 2, 1517–1539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00164-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00164-y

Keywords

Navigation