Skip to main content
Log in

High-Frequency Instabilities of the Ostrovsky Equation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Water Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the spectral stability of small-amplitude periodic traveling waves of the Ostrovsky equation. We prove that these waves exhibit spectral instabilities arising from a collision of pair of non-zero eigenvalues on the imaginary axis when subjected to square-integrable perturbations on the whole real line. We also list all such collisions between pairs of eigenvalues on the imaginary axis and do a Krein signature analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Bronski, J.C., Johnson, M.A.: The modulational instability for a generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 197(2), 357–400 (2010)

  2. Creedon, R., Deconinck, B., Trichtchenko, O.: High-frequency instabilities of the Kawahara equation: a perturbative approach. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 20(3), 1571–1595

  3. Deconinck, B., Trichtchenko, O.: High-frequency instabilities of small-amplitude solutions of Hamiltonian PDES. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 37(3), 1323–1358(2017)

  4. Gilman, O.A., Grimshaw, R., Stepanyants, Yu. A.: Approximate analytical and numerical solutions of the stationary Ostrovsky equation. Stud. Appl. Math. 95(1), 115–126(1995)

  5. Geyer, A., Pelinovsky, D.E.: Spectral stability of periodic waves in the generalized reduced Ostrovsky equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 107(7), 1293–1314(2017)

  6. Galkin, V.N., Stepanyants, Yu.A.: On the existence of stationary solitary waves in a rotating fluid. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 55(6), 939–943 (1991)

  7. Haragus, M.: Stability of periodic waves for the generalized BBM equation. Rev. Roumaine Maths. Pures Appl. 53, 445–463 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hur, V.M., Johnson, M.A.: Modulational instability in the Whitham equation for water waves. Stud. Appl. Math. 134(1), 120–143 (2015)

  9. Hur, V.M., Pandey, A.K.: Modulational instability in nonlinear nonlocal equations of regularized long wave type. Physica D Nonlinear Phenom. 325, 98–112 (2016)

  10. Hur, V.M., Pandey, A.K.: Modulational instability in a full-dispersion shallow water model. Stud. Appl. Math. 142(1), 3–47 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakkaev, S., Stanislavova, M., Stefanov, A.: Periodic traveling waves of the regularized short pulse and Ostrovsky equations: existence and stability. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49(1), 674–698(2017)

  12. Levandosky, S., Liu, Y.: Stability and weak rotation limit of solitary waves of the Ostrovsky equation. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 7(4), 793–806 (2007)

  13. Lu, D., Liu, L., Wu, L.: Orbital stability of solitary waves for generalized Ostrovsky equation. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 136. LNEE (2012)

  14. Linares, F., Milanés, A.: Local and global well-posedness for the Ostrovsky equation. J. Differ. Equ. 222(2), 325–340 (2006)

  15. Liu, Y., Varlamov, V.: Stability of solitary waves and weak rotation limit for the Ostrovsky equation. J. Differ. Equ. 203(1), 159–183 (2004)

  16. MacKay, R.S., Saffman, P.G.: Stability of water waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 406(1830), 115–125 (1986)

  17. Ostrovsky, L.A.: Nonlinear internal waves in a rotating ocean. Oceanology 18(2) (1978)

  18. Tsugawa, K.: Well-posedness and weak rotation limit for the Ostrovsky equation. J. Differ. Equ. 247(12), 3163–3180 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Bhavna and AKP are supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India under grant SRG/2019/000741. AK is supported by Junior Research Fellowships (JRF) by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Kumar Pandey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Lyapunov–Schmidt Procedure

Appendix A: Lyapunov–Schmidt Procedure

Since

$$\begin{aligned} \partial _k F(w,c;k) := (2ck w'' + 4\beta k^3 w'''' -2k (w^2)'' + \gamma w) \quad \text {and} \quad \partial _c F(w,c;k) := k^2 w'' \end{aligned}$$

are continuous, \(F:H^{4}({\mathbb {T}}) \times {\mathbb {R}} \times {\mathbb {R}}^+ \rightarrow L^2({\mathbb {T}})\) is \(C^1\). Note that

$$\begin{aligned} L_0 e^{\pm iz}=0. \end{aligned}$$

For arbitrary \(k>0\), we seek a non-trivial solution \(w\in H^{4}({\mathbb {T}})\) near trivial solution \(w\equiv 0\) of

$$\begin{aligned} F(w,c;k)=0 \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

for some c near \(c_0\), where \(c_0\) is defined in (2.3). Let

$$\begin{aligned} w(z)=0+\frac{1}{2}ae^{iz}+\frac{1}{2}\bar{a}e^{-iz}+v(z) \quad \text {and}\quad c=c_0+r, \end{aligned}$$

where \(a\in {\mathbb {C}}\) and \(v\in H^{4}({\mathbb {T}})\) satisfying that

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{\mathbb {T}} v(z)\,e^{\pm iz}~dz=0, \end{aligned}$$

and \(r\in {\mathbb {R}}\). Plugging these into (A.1) and using the fact that \(L_0e^{\pm iz}=0\), we arrive at

$$\begin{aligned} L_0v=g(a,\bar{a},v,r) = -rk^2 w'' + k^2 (w^2)'', \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

where g is analytic in its argument and \(g(0,0,0,r)=0\) for all \(r\in {\mathbb {R}}\). We define the projection operator \(\Pi :L^2({\mathbb {T}})\rightarrow \text {ker}L_0\) as

$$\begin{aligned} \Pi f(z)=\widehat{f}(1)e^{iz}+\widehat{f}(-1)e^{-iz}. \end{aligned}$$

Since \(\Pi v=0\), we may write (A.2) as

$$\begin{aligned} L_0v=(I-\Pi )g(a,\bar{a},v,r)\quad \text {and} \quad 0=\Pi g(a,\bar{a},v,r). \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

Note that, for wavenumbers not satisfying the resonance condition (2.4), we can write

$$\begin{aligned} f(z)= L_{0_{|(I-\Pi )H^{4}({\mathbb {T}})}} \left( \sum _{n\ne \pm 1}\frac{\widehat{f}(n)}{(-c_0k^2n^2 +\beta k^4 n^4 + \gamma )}e^{inz} \right) . \end{aligned}$$

or

$$\begin{aligned} ( L_{0_{|(I-\Pi )H^{4}({\mathbb {T}})}})^{-1}f(z) =\sum _{n\ne \pm 1}\frac{\widehat{f}(n)}{(-c_0k^2n^2 +\beta k^4 n^4 + \gamma )}e^{inz}. \end{aligned}$$

Consequently, we can rewrite (A.3) as

$$\begin{aligned} v=L_0^{-1}(I-\Pi )g(a,\bar{a},v,r)\quad \text {and} \quad 0=\Pi g(a,\bar{a},v,r). \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

Note that \(( L_{0_{|(I-\Pi )H^{4}({\mathbb {T}})}})^{-1}\) depends analytically on its arguments.

In parallel with the proof in [8], it follows from the repeated use of implicit function theorem and symmetries of the equation that a unique solution

$$\begin{aligned} (v,r)=(V(a,\bar{a},r),r(|a|)) \end{aligned}$$

exists to equations in (A.4) in the vicinity of \((a,\bar{a},r)=(0,0,0)\), which depends analytically on its argument. Moreover,

$$\begin{aligned} w(z)=0+a\cos z+V(a,a,r(|a|))(z)\quad \text {and}\quad c=c_0+r(|a|) \end{aligned}$$

solve (A.1) for |a| sufficiently small. Since details are exactly similar, we omit it here.

Since w and c depend analytically on a for |a| sufficiently small and since c is even in a, we write that

$$\begin{aligned} w(k;a)(z)= 0+ a \cos z+a^2w_2(z)+a^3w_3(z)+a^4w_4(z)+O(a^5) \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} c(k;a)=c_0(k)+a^2c_2+a^4c_4+O(a^6) \end{aligned}$$

as \(a\rightarrow 0\), where \(u_2\), \(u_3\) and \(u_4\) are even and \(2\pi \)-periodic in z. Substituting these into (A.1), we see that the coefficients of a both sides are equal. Equating the coefficients of \(a^2\), we arrive at

$$\begin{aligned} \beta k^4 w_2''''+c_0k^2 w_2''+\gamma w_2=-2k^2\cos (2z) \end{aligned}$$

which has solution

$$\begin{aligned} w_2(z)=A_2\cos (2z):=\frac{2k^2}{3\gamma -12\beta k^4}\cos (2z). \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

For \(O(a^3)\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \beta k^4 w_3''''+c_0k^2 w_3''+\gamma w_3 =k^2(c_2-A_2)\cos (z)-9k^2 A_2\cos (3z) \end{aligned}$$

which has solution

$$\begin{aligned} c_2=A_2 \end{aligned}$$
(A.6)

and

$$\begin{aligned} w_3(z)=A_3\cos (3z):=\frac{9k^2A_2}{8\gamma -72\beta k^4}\cos (3z). \end{aligned}$$
(A.7)

For \(O(a^4)\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} c_4=3A_2A_3-2A_2^3 \end{aligned}$$
(A.8)

and

$$\begin{aligned} w_4(z)= & {} A_{42}\cos 2z+A_{44}\cos 4z:=\left( 2A_2A_3-2A_2^3 \right) \cos 2z\nonumber \\&\quad +\left( \dfrac{8k^2(A_2^2+2A_3)}{15\gamma -240\beta k^4} \right) \cos 4z. \end{aligned}$$
(A.9)

This completes the proof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhavna, Kumar, A. & Pandey, A.K. High-Frequency Instabilities of the Ostrovsky Equation. Water Waves 4, 91–108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42286-021-00054-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42286-021-00054-0

Navigation