Skip to main content
Log in

Exploration and Analysis of Biodegradable Polymeric Films Reinforced with Surgical Face Masks Ash

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chemistry Africa Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disposable Surgical Face Masks (SFMs) are being used in the fight against Corona VIrus Disease-19 (COVID-19) during the pandemic. Since SFMs are made of polymers, their mass production causes severe environmental pollution. To reduce the SFM pollution, we have synthesized ash from the SFMs by incineration. A simple solution casting method is used to blend the surgical face mask ash (SFMA) with biodegradable hydroxypropyl methylcellulose polymer (HPMC). We have successfully adopted the Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS) method to fabricate HPMC–SFMA films using water as the solvent. The successful incorporation of SFM-derived ash into the HPMC matrix was confirmed by FT-IR and FE-SEM characterization techniques. The addition of SFMA to the HPMC matrix has implications for Young’s modulus, as well as their biodegradation behavior. The incorporation of SFMA in the HPMC matrix changes its stiffness and elasticity, potentially affecting the film’s mechanical performance. Furthermore, while HPMC is biodegradable, the inclusion of SFMA hinders its biodegradation rate and enhances the life span of HPMC. Hence, the HPMC–SFMA films would be a promising candidate for agricultural mulching and this work leads to a conceptual basis for the production of novel materials in agricultural mulching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Meyerowitz EA, Richterman A, Gandhi RT, Paul E (2021) Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a review of viral host and environmental factors. Ann Intern Med 174:69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cifuentes-Faura J (2021) Analysis of containment measures and economic policies arising from COVID-19 in the European Union. Int Rev Appl Econ 35:242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Selvaranjan K, Satheeskumar N, Pathmanathan R, Nishanthan R (2021) Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: a review and potential solutions. Environ Chall 3:100039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Du H, Huang S, Wang J (2022) Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Total Environ Sci 815:152980

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oisik D, Rasoul EN, Antonio JC, Mikael S, Hedenqvist MF, Qiang X, Lin J, Dongxiao J, Seeram R (2020) The need for fully bio-based facemasks to counter coronavirus outbreaks: a perspective. Sci Total Environ 736:139611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Selvakumar D, Veeramuthu A, Rajesh P, Heli S, Kit W, Wei-Hsin C, Chawalit N (2021) Pyrolysis: an effective technique for degradation of COVID-19 medical wastes. Chemosphere 275:130092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatto A, Drago C, Ruggeri M (2022) On the frontline—a bibliometric study on sustainability development coronaviruses and COVID-19. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:42983–42999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunasekaran K, Bilal M, Gabriel ED, Prabhu K, Mayakrishnan M, Rajeswari MV, Saravanakumar A (2023) Personal protective equipment (PPE) pollution driven by COVID-19 pandemic in Marina Beach, the longest urban beach in Asia: abundance, distribution, and analytical characterization. Mar Pollut Bull 186:114476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortega F, Calero M, Rico N, Martín-Lara MA (2023) COVID-19 personal protective equipment (PPE) contamination in coastal areas of Granada. Spain Mar Pollut Bull 191:114908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cristina P, Miguel A, Emilio R, Marina P, Juan L (2021) Deposition of gum rosin microspheres on polypropylene microfibres used in face masks to enhance their hydrophobic behaviour. Environ Technol Innov 24:101812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ana MO, Ana L, Amadeu MVM, Damià B, Armando CD, Teresa R (2023) Current knowledge on the presence biodegradation and toxicity of discarded face masks in the environment. J Environ Chem Eng 11:109308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Knicker H, Velasco-Molina M (2022) Biodegradability of disposable surgical face masks littered into soil systems during the COVID 19 pandemic—a first approach using microcosms. Soil Syst 6:39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benson NU, Bassey DE, Palanisami T (2021) COVID pollution: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global plastic waste footprint. Heliyon 7:06343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saberian M, Li J, Kilmartin-Lynch S, Boroujeni M (2021) Repurposing of COVID-19 single-use face masks for pavements base/subbase. Sci Total Environ 769:145527

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed W, Lim CW (2022) Effective recycling of disposable medical face masks for sustainable green concrete via a new fiber hybridization technique. Constr Build Mater 344:128245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Qu Y, Feng BL (2022) Straw mulching improved yield of field buckwheat (Fagopyrum) by increasing water-temperature use and soil carbon in rain-fed farmland. Acta Ecol Sin 42:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang C, Gao X (2022) Impact of microplastics from polyethylene and biodegradable mulch films on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci Total Environ 828:154579

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saurabh S, Ramsha K, Abhishek S, Sekar S (2022) Microplastics from face masks: a potential hazard post Covid-19 pandemic. Chemosphere 302:134805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heather A, Leslie MJM, van Velzen H, Brandsma A, Dick Vethaak JJ, Garcia V, Marja H (2022) Lamoree discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ Int 163:107199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu F, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2021) Challenges and new opportunities on barrier performance of biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging. Prog Polym Sci 117:10139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sander M (2019) Biodegradation of polymeric mulch films in agricultural soils: concepts knowledge gaps and future research directions. Environ Sci Technol 53:2304

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Jiang S, Chen Y, Qiu D, Weng Y (2023) Synthesis and characterization of a novel composite edible film based on hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose grafted with gelatin. Gels 9:332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding C, Zhang M, Li G (2015) Preparation and characterization of collagen/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) blend film. Carbohyd Polym 119:194–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Imran M, Elfahmy S, Revoljunelles-Junelles AM, Desobry S (2010) Cellulose derivative based active coatings: effects of nisin and plasticizer on physico-chemical and antimicrobial properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films. Carbohyd Polym 81:219–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Klangmuang P, Sothornvit R (2019) Barrier properties, mechanical properties and antimicrobial activity of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based nanocomposite films incorporated with Thai essential oils. Food Hydrocoll 61:609–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aydogdu A, Yildiz E, Ayhan Z, Aydogdu Y, Sahin S (2019) Nanostructured poly(lactic acid)/soy protein/HPMC films by electrospinning for potential applications in food industry. Eur Polym J 112:477–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mansoor Z, Tchuenbou-Magaia F, Kowalczuk M, Adamus G, Manning G, Parati M, Radecka I, Khan H (2022) Polymers use as mulch films in agriculture—a review of history, problems and current trends. Polymers 14:5062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Prasad P, Guru GS, Shivakumar HR, Rai KS (2008) Miscibility thermal and mechanical studies of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/pullulan blends. J Appl Polym Sci 110:444–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bilbao-Sáinz C, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Wood DF (2010) Composite edible films based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose nanoparticles. J Agric Food Chem 58:3753–3760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Samuel K, Joshua SB, Babur ZC, Milan D, Milan DA (2019) Glassy state molecular mobility and its relationship to the physico-mechanical properties of plasticized hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) films. Int J Pharm X 1:100033

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wenlong L, Yang Z, Douxin X, Jingli C, Jinhao Z (2020) A biodegradable water-triggered chitosan/hydroxyl propyl methylcellulose pesticide mulch film for sustained control of Phytophthora sojae in soybean. J Clean Prod 245:118943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yousef S, Justas E, Nerijus S, Mohammed AA (2021) Pyrolysis kinetic behavior and TG-FTIR-GC–MS analysis of Coronavirus Face Masks. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 156:105118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Leonelli C, Turk K, Poggetto GD, Catauro M, Traven K, MaukoPranjić A, Ducman V (2022) Environmental and biological impact of fly ash and metakaolin-based alkali-activated foams obtained at 70 °C and Fired at 1000 °C. Front Chem 10:845452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Teodorescu GM, Vuluga Z, Oancea F, Ionita A, Paceagiu J, Ghiurea M, Nicolae CA, Gabor AR, Raditoiu V (2023) Properties of composites based on recycled polypropylene and silico-aluminous industrial waste. Polymers 15:2545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoshiko T, Fumika H, Kohei T, Hirofumi T (2021) Orally disintegrating films: the effects of water content on disintegration and mechanical properties. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 66:102893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruimin Q, Davey LJ, Qiuyun L, Qin L, Zhen L, Changrong Y (2021) Field test on the biodegradation of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) based mulch films in soil. Polymer Test 93:107009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trivedi NS, Mandavgane SA, Mehetre S, Bhaskar DK (2016) Characterization and valorization of biomass ashes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:20243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang M, Jianfu C, Kok BT, Meichun C, Yujing Z (2022) Development of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose film with xanthan gum and its application as an excellent food packaging bio-material in enhancing the shelf life of banana. Food Chem 374:131794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guangtao X, Yiying H, Xiaowei L, Jiayu T, Wang W, Zhuo G, Yuyao W, Yuchen H, Jian L (2023) A hydrogel electrolyte based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose modified polyacrylamine for efficient electrochromic energy storage devices. Eur Polym J 186:111856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang H, Dafu W, Anna Z, Huining X (2015) Soil burial biodegradation of antimicrobial biodegradable PBAT films. Polym Degrad Stab 116:14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. La Mantia FP, Ascione L, Mistretta MC, Rapisarda M, Rizzarelli P (2020) Comparative investigation on the soil burial degradation behaviour of polymer films for agriculture before and after photo-oxidation. Polymers 12:753

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Writing—original draft, Software: MR; Formal analysis, Data curation, Methodology: MR, RD; Investigation, Supervision: SS; Project administration, Visualization, Resources: JP; Validation, Supervision, Writing—review and editing: JC-F.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajagopalan Mahendran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

All the authors have given consent to their contribution.

Consent to Publish

All the authors have agreed with the content and all have given explicit consent to publish.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahendran, R., Dhanabal, R., Cifuentes-Faura, J. et al. Exploration and Analysis of Biodegradable Polymeric Films Reinforced with Surgical Face Masks Ash. Chemistry Africa 7, 813–822 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-023-00804-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-023-00804-2

Keywords

Navigation