Abstract
In modern mechanical design, non-sticky and non-slippery surfaces are highly preferred in many applications. In this work, bio-inspired micro patterns of hexagonal pillar and round dimple with various geometric parameters are fabricated, and the static friction and adhesion performances of the prepared surfaces are investigated. It is found that hexagonal pillar patterns can enhance the static friction and weaken the adhesion performances either at dry or wet conditions. The effects of round dimple patterns on the tribological performances depend on the wetting condition, the load, and the area density. The function mechanism of the designed surfaces is revealed, and a general design principle of the biomimetic patterned surface is proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Varenberg M, Gorb S. A beetle-inspired solution for underwater adhesion. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2008, 5, 383–385.
Zhang C Q, McAdams D A, Grunlan J C. Nano/Micro-manufacturing of bioinspired materials: A review of methods to mimic natural structures. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28, 6292–6321.
Li Y S, Krahn J, Menon C. Bioinspired dry adhesive materials and their application in robotics: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 181–199.
Baik S, Kim D W, Park Y J, Lee T J, Bhang S H, Pang C H. A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature, 2017, 546, 396–400.
Autumn K, Peattie A M. Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42, 1081–1090.
Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, Mecke K, Jacobs K, Gorb S N, Arzt E. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005, 102, 16293–16296.
Federle W, Barnes W J P, Baumgartner W, Drechsler P, Smith J M. Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2006, 3, 689–697.
Iturri J, Xue L J, Kappl M, García-Fernández L, Barnes W J P, Butt H-J, Campo A. Torrent frog-inspired adhesives: Attachment to flooded surfaces. Advanced Functional Materials, 2015, 25, 1499–1505.
Varenberg M, Gorb S N. Hexagonal surface micropattern for dry and wet friction. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21, 483–486.
Wang S, Li M, Huang W, Wang X L. Sticking/Climbing ability and morphology studies of the toe pads of chinese fire belly newt. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 115–123.
Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405, 681–685.
Barnes W J P. Functional morphology and design constraints of smooth adhesive pads. MRS Bulletin, 2011, 32, 479–485.
Dorogin L, Tiwari A, Rotella C, Mangiagalli P, Persson B N J. Role of preload in adhesion of rough surfaces. Physical Review Letters, 2017, 118, 238001.
Barnes W J P, Goodwyn P J P, Nokhbatolfoghahai M, Gorb S N. Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2011, 197, 969–978.
Chen D H, Zhang Y C, Long G, Liu W, Li X H, Sun Y H, Chang Z Y. An optimal wet friction plate inspired by biological surface patterns. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 872–882.
Ji A, Zhao Z H, Manoonpong P, Wang W, Chen G M, Dai Z D. A bio-inspired climbing robot with flexible pads and claws. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 368–378.
Tiwari A, Dorogin L, Bennett A I, Schulze K D, Sawyer W G, Tahir M, Heinrich G, Persson B N J. The effect of surface roughness and viscoelasticity on rubber adhesion. Soft Matter, 2017, 13, 3602–3621.
Xue L J, Iturri J, Kappl M, Butt H J, Campo A. Bioinspired orientation-dependent friction. Langmuir, 2014, 30, 11175–11182.
Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattie A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Israelachvili J N, Full R J. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99, 12252–12256.
Butt H-J, Barnes W J P, Campo A, Kappl M, Schonfeld F. Capillary forces between soft, elastic spheres. Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 5930–5936.
Persson B N J. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19, 376110.
Lorenz B, Persson B N J. Fluid squeeze-out between rough surfaces: Comparison of theory with experiment. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2011, 23, 355005.
Xie J, Li M, Dai Q W, Huang W, Wang X L. Key parameters of biomimetic patterned surface for wet adhesion. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2018, 82, 72–78.
Drotlef D-M, Stepien L, Kappl M, Barnes W J P, Butt H-J, Campo A. Insights into the adhesive mechanisms of tree frogs using artificial mimics. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23, 1137–1146.
Huang W, Wang X L. Biomimetic design of elastomer surface pattern for friction control under wet conditions. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 46001–46006.
Li M, Dai Q W, Huang W, Wang X L. Pillar versus dimple patterned surfaces for wettability and adhesion with varying scales. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2018, 15, 20180681.
Li M, Jiao Q, Dai Q W, Shi L P, Huang W, Wang X L. Effects of bulk viscoelasticity and surface wetting on the contact and adhesive properties of a soft material. Polymer Testing, 2019, 74, 266–273.
Persson B N J. Biological adhesion for locomotion: Basic principles. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2007, 21, 1145–1173.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51675268), and Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 2016-HYGC-013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, Q., Chang, Q., Li, M. et al. Non-sticky and Non-slippery Biomimetic Patterned Surfaces. J Bionic Eng 17, 326–334 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0026-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0026-3