Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of surface roughness and coating alternatives of seawater pipes on energy efficiency of ships

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon steel seawater piping in marine vessels is susceptible to corrosion resulting in the application of various coatings to reduce the corrosion rate and extend the life of the piping. Typically, coatings are selected primarily on the basis of corrosion protection without considering energy losses related to the friction of the resulting coated surface. Galvanizing is the most common method of coating seawater piping on marine vessels; however, galvanizing increases the internal pipe roughness and consequently, pressure drop, and energy consumed in pumping. This study determines the potential energy savings by comparing polyethylene coating to galvanized coating on marine vessel piping systems. The comparison was performed using both analytical and computational methods for the case of the reference vessel system. The energy savings for polyethylene coatings indicated between a 33% and 44% percent energy savings for pipe, without considering the fittings, depending on the Reynolds number of the flow. Energy saving for the pipe with fittings was obtained using CFD since there is no data for polyethylene coated fittings and found slightly lower because turbulence and eddies contribution to head losses. Results of the analytical study were further verified using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The reduction in carbon emissions per year is then quantified to be around 20 tons. In addition, when deterioration of galvanized steel pipe is considered, the amount of emission reduced increases every year till reaching 40 tons/year after five years of operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS Inc. (2015) ANSYS fluent user guide. ANSYS Inc. http://www.ansys.com

  • Crane Co. (1982) Flow of fluids through valves, fittings and pipe. https://www.amazon.com/Through-Valves-Fittings-Technical-Printing/dp/B0015E21UM. (Accessed 11 Mar 2021)

  • Durmusoglu, Y., Koçak, G., Deniz, C., Zincir, B., & Rijeci Pomorski fakultet Rijeka, S. (2015). Energy efficiency analysis of pump systems in a ship power plant and a case study of a container ship. 16 th IAMU annual general assembly opatija. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299600017. (Accessed 28 Feb 2021)

  • Düz, H. (2017). Impact of excess roughness on power consumption in pipe flows (Vol. 7).

  • Farshad, F. F., & Rieke, H. H. (2006). Surface-roughness design values for modern pipes.

  • Kocak, G., & Durmusoglu, Y. (2018). Energy efficiency analysis of a ship’s central cooling system using variable speed pump. Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, 17(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2017.1283192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, J. K., & Azad, R. S. (1976). Nonasymptotic behavior of developing turbulent pipe flow. Canadian Journal of Physics, 54(3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1139/p76-032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2017). Boundary-layer theory (Ninth Edition). McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Speight, V. L. (2014). Impact of pipe roughness on pumping energy in complex distribution systems. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 70, pp. 1575–1581). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.174

  • Third IMO GHG Study 2014 executive summary and final report. (2015). www.imo.org. (Accessed 11 Mar 2021)

  • Yelmanov, D., & Shutterstock, (2018). energy Efficiency existing ship index (EEXI) December 2020.

  • Yousefi, A. (2019). Head loss increase in service lines with time-With examples from Asker municipality. Norwegian University of life science.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, M., Schaus, D. Effect of surface roughness and coating alternatives of seawater pipes on energy efficiency of ships. Int J Energ Water Res 6, 183–193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00164-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00164-y

Keywords

Navigation