Skip to main content
Log in

Common Sense, Language, and Semantic Primes: Liminal or Constant Concepts of Psychology?

  • ARENA OF EPISTEMOLOGY
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common sense, language, and semantic primes are linguistic and psychological elements that enable people to speak and to understand each other with ease. Ease and fluidity of interaction do not, however, arise on their own. On the contrary, if we lose common sense, commonly shared language and even some primitive basic components of language, such as semantic primes, we face disorderliness, chaos, and misunderstandings in small and large group interactions. Such a dystopian scenario sounds extreme, but this article presents an argument that we now witness increasing decay of both “common sense” and “common word meanings,” as our mass and social media practices change. Without the cultural psychological key notions of common sense and common word meanings, the necessary psychic unity decreases, as Jan Smedslund’s (1988) psychologic posits. I propose as an antidote to the observable disorderliness and the loss of “common meaning” a critical analysis of these core concepts and an increased effort to regenerate common meanings. While the media “narrow-cast” meanings to small groups of like-minded individuals, such like-mindedness is also at the heart of the process of making something “common,” in any sense. Thus, if we become good at reflecting and understanding fundamental semantic primes and basic psychological axioms of our language, we are also better equipped to consider unfamiliar word meanings with flexibility. This would enable new meanings in the social regulation of common language and interaction between people who otherwise “talk past one another.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardone-Cone, A., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(6), 537–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baresch, B., Knight, L., Harp, D., & Yaschur, C. (2011). Friends who choose your news: an analysis of content links on Facebook. ISOJ: The Official Research Journal of International Symposium on Online Journalism, 1(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). The hyper-realism of simulation. In M. Poster (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: selected writings (pp. 143–147). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, L. (2001). The role of truth when communicating knowledge across epistemic difference. Social Epistemology, 15(4), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, S. J. (2011). Emerging and continuing trends in vaccine opposition website content. Vaccine, 29(10), 1874–1880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Betsch, C., Brewer, N. T., Brocard, P., Davies, P., Gaissmaier, W., Haase, N., Leask, J., Renkewitz, F., Renner, B., Reyna, V. F., Rossmann, C., Sachse, K., Schachinger, A., Siegrist, M., & Stryk, M. (2012). Opportunities and challenges of web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine, 30(25), 3727–3733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2015). Imagining cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R. (2015a). The idiographic approach in psychological research. The challenge of overcoming old distinctions without risking to homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 360–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R. (2015b). La Mente come Forma. La Mente come Testo. Un’indagine semiotico-psicologica sui processi di significazione. Milan: Mimemis Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2014). Catalysis and morphogenesis: the contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The catalyzing mind: beyond models of causality (pp. 149–163). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016). Borders and modal articulations: semiotic constructs of sensemaking processes enabling a fecund dialogue between cultural psychology and clinical psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M. L., & Freda, M. F. (2017). Modal articulation: the psychological and semiotic functions of modalities in the sensemaking process. Theory & Psychology, 28(1), 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca Picione, R., & Valsiner, J. (2017). Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: liminality of narrative processes. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 532–547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. (1990). The imperative of sociability: moral culture in the late Scottish enlightenment. Journal of Eighteenth Century Studies, 13(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, G., Freda, M. F., & Bosco, V. (2015). Examining perception of competency through practicum competencies outline. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(8), 700–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302–1304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freda, M. F. (2011). Understanding continuity to recognize discontinuity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freda, M. F., & Esposito, G. (2017). Promoting reflection and reflexivity through narrative devices: narrative mediation path qualitative multimodal method. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(1), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, C. (1998). Bad arguments against semantic primitives. Theoretical Linguistics, 24(2–3), 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016, May). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016 (Publication by Pew Research Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L. (2000). Understanding children’s worlds: the work of the imagination. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, C. E. J. (2009). Choice is not true or false: the domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning, 23(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeberst, A., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2016). What is knowledge? Who creates it? Who possesses it? The need for novel answers to old questions. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Computer-supported collaborative learning series (Vol. vol 16, pp. 105–124). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, V. K., Bednarczyk, R. A., Salmon, D. A., & Omer, S. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(11), 1149–1158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resch, R. P. (1992). Althusser and the renewal of Marxist social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, L. (2003). Democracy, new social movements, and the Internet. In M. McCaughey & M. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice (pp. 117–144). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1997). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2008). From Heider to psycho-logic. Social Psychology, 39(3), 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2012). Psycho-logic: some thoughts and after-thoughts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. (1989). The three waves of modernity. In H. Gildin (Ed.), An introduction to political philosophy: Ten essays by Leo Strauss (pp. 81–98). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 1–39). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2015). Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2016). Toward a cogenetic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2018). Affective semiosis and affective logic. New Ideas in Psychology, 48, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (1997). Open sky. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vähämaa, M. (2013a). Groups as epistemic communities: social forces and affect as antecedents to knowledge. Social Epistemology, 27(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vähämaa, M. (2013b). A groups epistemology is a group necessity: a reply to Fallis and Mathiesen. Social Epistemology, 27(1), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vähämaa, M. (2015). Groups as epistemic communities—studies on the role of groups in forming and circulating social knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. (http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-1012-1).

  • Whitrow, G. J. (1988). Time in history: the evolution of our general awareness of time and temporal perspective. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: diversity and universals. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (2001). What did Jesus mean? Explaining the sermon on the mount and the parables in simple and universal human concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Inspirational thanks belong to Jan Smedslund for his long-lasting work on non-empirical psychology with its implications on common sense and semantic primes and to Mark D. West’s early and helpful and insightful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miika Vähämaa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vähämaa, M. Common Sense, Language, and Semantic Primes: Liminal or Constant Concepts of Psychology?. Hu Arenas 1, 305–320 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0014-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0014-x

Keywords

Navigation