Abstract
Common sense, language, and semantic primes are linguistic and psychological elements that enable people to speak and to understand each other with ease. Ease and fluidity of interaction do not, however, arise on their own. On the contrary, if we lose common sense, commonly shared language and even some primitive basic components of language, such as semantic primes, we face disorderliness, chaos, and misunderstandings in small and large group interactions. Such a dystopian scenario sounds extreme, but this article presents an argument that we now witness increasing decay of both “common sense” and “common word meanings,” as our mass and social media practices change. Without the cultural psychological key notions of common sense and common word meanings, the necessary psychic unity decreases, as Jan Smedslund’s (1988) psychologic posits. I propose as an antidote to the observable disorderliness and the loss of “common meaning” a critical analysis of these core concepts and an increased effort to regenerate common meanings. While the media “narrow-cast” meanings to small groups of like-minded individuals, such like-mindedness is also at the heart of the process of making something “common,” in any sense. Thus, if we become good at reflecting and understanding fundamental semantic primes and basic psychological axioms of our language, we are also better equipped to consider unfamiliar word meanings with flexibility. This would enable new meanings in the social regulation of common language and interaction between people who otherwise “talk past one another.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bardone-Cone, A., & Cass, K. M. (2007). What does viewing a pro-anorexia website do? An experimental examination of website exposure and moderating effects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(6), 537–548.
Baresch, B., Knight, L., Harp, D., & Yaschur, C. (2011). Friends who choose your news: an analysis of content links on Facebook. ISOJ: The Official Research Journal of International Symposium on Online Journalism, 1(2), 1–24.
Baudrillard, J. (1988). The hyper-realism of simulation. In M. Poster (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: selected writings (pp. 143–147). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bergin, L. (2001). The role of truth when communicating knowledge across epistemic difference. Social Epistemology, 15(4), 367–378.
Bean, S. J. (2011). Emerging and continuing trends in vaccine opposition website content. Vaccine, 29(10), 1874–1880.
Betsch, C., Brewer, N. T., Brocard, P., Davies, P., Gaissmaier, W., Haase, N., Leask, J., Renkewitz, F., Renner, B., Reyna, V. F., Rossmann, C., Sachse, K., Schachinger, A., Siegrist, M., & Stryk, M. (2012). Opportunities and challenges of web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine, 30(25), 3727–3733.
Brinkmann, S. (2015). Imagining cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 243–250.
De Luca Picione, R. (2015a). The idiographic approach in psychological research. The challenge of overcoming old distinctions without risking to homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 360–370.
De Luca Picione, R. (2015b). La Mente come Forma. La Mente come Testo. Un’indagine semiotico-psicologica sui processi di significazione. Milan: Mimemis Edizioni.
De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2014). Catalysis and morphogenesis: the contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The catalyzing mind: beyond models of causality (pp. 149–163). New York: Springer.
De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016). Borders and modal articulations: semiotic constructs of sensemaking processes enabling a fecund dialogue between cultural psychology and clinical psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50, 29–43.
De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M. L., & Freda, M. F. (2017). Modal articulation: the psychological and semiotic functions of modalities in the sensemaking process. Theory & Psychology, 28(1), 84–103.
De Luca Picione, R., & Valsiner, J. (2017). Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: liminality of narrative processes. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 532–547.
Dwyer, J. (1990). The imperative of sociability: moral culture in the late Scottish enlightenment. Journal of Eighteenth Century Studies, 13(2), 169–184.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892.
Esposito, G., Freda, M. F., & Bosco, V. (2015). Examining perception of competency through practicum competencies outline. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(8), 700–720.
Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302–1304.
Freda, M. F. (2011). Understanding continuity to recognize discontinuity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 45, 335–346.
Freda, M. F., & Esposito, G. (2017). Promoting reflection and reflexivity through narrative devices: narrative mediation path qualitative multimodal method. Qualitative Research Journal, 17(1), 2–19.
Goddard, C. (1998). Bad arguments against semantic primitives. Theoretical Linguistics, 24(2–3), 129–156.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016, May). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016 (Publication by Pew Research Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). London: Heinemann.
Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harris, P. L. (2000). Understanding children’s worlds: the work of the imagination. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 311–335.
Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709–1716.
Kock, C. E. J. (2009). Choice is not true or false: the domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning, 23(1), 61–80.
Oeberst, A., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2016). What is knowledge? Who creates it? Who possesses it? The need for novel answers to old questions. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Computer-supported collaborative learning series (Vol. vol 16, pp. 105–124). Cham: Springer.
Phadke, V. K., Bednarczyk, R. A., Salmon, D. A., & Omer, S. B. (2016). Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(11), 1149–1158.
Piaget, J. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge and K. Paul.
Resch, R. P. (1992). Althusser and the renewal of Marxist social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Salter, L. (2003). Democracy, new social movements, and the Internet. In M. McCaughey & M. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice (pp. 117–144). New York: Routledge.
Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Smedslund, J. (1997). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Smedslund, J. (2008). From Heider to psycho-logic. Social Psychology, 39(3), 157–162.
Smedslund, J. (2012). Psycho-logic: some thoughts and after-thoughts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 295–302.
Strauss, L. (1989). The three waves of modernity. In H. Gildin (Ed.), An introduction to political philosophy: Ten essays by Leo Strauss (pp. 81–98). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (pp. 1–39). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.
Tateo, L. (2015). Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Culture & Psychology, 21(2), 145–161.
Tateo, L. (2016). Toward a cogenetic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 433–447.
Tateo, L. (2018). Affective semiosis and affective logic. New Ideas in Psychology, 48, 1–11.
Virilio, P. (1997). Open sky. New York: Verso.
Vähämaa, M. (2013a). Groups as epistemic communities: social forces and affect as antecedents to knowledge. Social Epistemology, 27(1), 3–20.
Vähämaa, M. (2013b). A groups epistemology is a group necessity: a reply to Fallis and Mathiesen. Social Epistemology, 27(1), 26–31.
Vähämaa, M. (2015). Groups as epistemic communities—studies on the role of groups in forming and circulating social knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. (http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-1012-1).
Whitrow, G. J. (1988). Time in history: the evolution of our general awareness of time and temporal perspective. London: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: diversity and universals. Cambridge: University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (2001). What did Jesus mean? Explaining the sermon on the mount and the parables in simple and universal human concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
Inspirational thanks belong to Jan Smedslund for his long-lasting work on non-empirical psychology with its implications on common sense and semantic primes and to Mark D. West’s early and helpful and insightful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vähämaa, M. Common Sense, Language, and Semantic Primes: Liminal or Constant Concepts of Psychology?. Hu Arenas 1, 305–320 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0014-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0014-x