Skip to main content
Log in

BPO/LUTS – Aktuelles zur medikamentösen Therapie

BPO/LUTS—latest news on drug treatment

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

„Lower urinary tract symptoms“ (LUTS) gehören zu den häufigsten Beschwerden der Patienten in der täglichen urologischen Praxis, wobei eine benigne Prostatavergrößerung die häufigste Ursache für LUTS bei Männern darstellt. Für die Therapie, die nur bei subjektiv störender Symptomatik eingeleitet werden sollte, stehen neben einer operativen Sanierung zunächst konservative und medikamentöse Therapiestrategien zur Verfügung. Diverse Phytotherapeutika führen zwar zur Verbesserung der Symptomatik (IPSS [„international prostate symptome score“]) und des Harnstrahls (Qmax), die Krankheitsprogression wird jedoch nicht beeinflusst. Ähnliches, wenn auch deutlich besser untersucht, gilt für die Gruppe der schnell wirksamen α1-Blocker. Bei Patienten mit einem Prostatavolumen <40 ml gelten sie als Mittel der ersten Wahl. Mit einer Reduktion des Prostatavolumens und damit einhergehend einer Verhinderung der Krankheitsprogression bilden 5α-Reduktase-Hemmer eine wichtige Säule in der medikamentösen Therapie der männlichen LUTS. Ein Wirkungseintritt ist jedoch frühestens nach 3‑monatiger Therapiedauer zu erwarten. Mit Tadalafil, 5 mg/Tag, steht auch ein PDE5-Hemmer („Phosphodiesterase-5“) für die Pharmakotherapie der LUTS zur Verfügung. Neben der Verbesserung einer ED („Erektile Dysfunktion“) vermindert die Behandlung auch die LUTS-Symptomatik (IPSS). Patienten, bei denen die Harnspeichersymptomatik vordergründig ist, profitieren von einer Therapie mit verschiedenen Muskarinrezeptorantagonisten. Dabei sollte im Vorfeld eine ausgeprägte subvesikale Obstruktion mit Restharnbildung ausgeschlossen werden. Bei schlechter Verträglichkeit dieser Substanzgruppe (Mundtrockenheit, Obstipation) kann alternativ der Beta-3-Agonist Mirabegron eingesetzt werden, der bei ähnlicher Wirksamkeit besser verträglich ist, sofern keine ausgeprägte Hypertonie bekannt ist. Die angeführten Substanzgruppen wurden in verschiedenen Kombinationen getestet, wobei neben der erwünschten additiven Wirkung auch eine Verstärkung der Nebenwirkungen berücksichtigt werden muss.

Abstract

“Lower urinary tract symptoms” (LUTS) are among the most common complaints of urological patients. Benign prostate enlargement represents the most common cause of LUTS in men and treatment should only be initiated in patients with bothering symptoms. There are various different therapeutic strategies to choose from: phytotherapeutic drugs significantly improve obstructive symptoms (IPSS [“international prostate symptome score”]) and maximum urinary flow (Qmax), yet disease progression is not inhibited. The same applies to the group of the rapid-acting α1-blockers, which are considered as first-line therapy in patients with a prostate volume <40 ml. The 5α-reductase inhibitors are another important therapeutic option for men with symptoms of LUTS and a prostate volume >40 ml, accompanying the effect of prostate volume reduction and concomitant prevention of disease progression—onset of these favorable effects are expected after a therapy period of 3 months. Tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE 5) inhibitor, has its main indication in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, yet a daily oral dose of 5 mg was also shown to significantly improve LUTS. Patients predominantly suffering from storage symptoms can benefit from oral therapy with a muscarinic receptor antagonist. Here, infravesical obstruction should be ruled out in advance and the absence of increased post-void residual urine volume is necessary. Mirabregone, a beta-3 agonist, can be used as a safe alternative in individuals with persistent side effects like xerostomia or constipation, yet is not recommended for patients with severe hypertension. Combination therapies have been subject to many studies in the past and have been shown to achieve more symptom relief when the higher rate of side effects is well tolerated by the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-the-Management-of-Non-Neurogenic-Male-LUTS-2019.pdf. Zugegriffen: 28.05.2019

  2. Flanigan RC, Reda DJ, Wasson JH, Anderson RJ, Abdellatif M, Bruskewitz RC (1998) 5‑year outcome of surgical resection and watchful waiting for men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study. J Urol 160(1):12–16 (discussion 6–7)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown CT, Yap T, Cromwell DA, Rixon L, Steed L, Mulligan K et al (2007) Self management for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 334(7583):25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yap TL, Brown C, Cromwell DA, van der Meulen J, Emberton M (2009) The impact of self-management of lower urinary tract symptoms on frequency-volume chart measures. BJU Int 104(8):1104–1108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levin RM, Das AK (2000) A scientific basis for the therapeutic effects of Pygeum africanum and Serenoa repens. Urol Res 28(3):201–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buck AC (2004) Is there a scientific basis for the therapeutic effects of serenoa repens in benign prostatic hyperplasia? Mechanisms of action. J Urol 172(5 Pt 1):1792–1799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Madersbacher S, Berger I, Ponholzer A, Marszalek M (2008) Plant extracts: sense or nonsense? Curr Opin Urol 18(1):16–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgia G, Russo GI, Voce S, Palmieri F, Gentile M, Giannantoni A et al (2014) Serenoa repens, lycopene and selenium versus tamsulosin for the treatment of LUTS/BPH. An Italian multicenter double-blinded randomized study between single or combination therapy (PROCOMB trial). Prostate 74(15):1471–1480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tacklind J, Macdonald R, Rutks I, Stanke JU, Wilt TJ (2012) Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001423.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Novara G, Giannarini G, Alcaraz A, Cozar-Olmo JM, Descazeaud A, Montorsi F et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of hexanic lipidosterolic extract of serenoa repens (Permixon) in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol Focus 2(5):553–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Michel MC, Vrydag W (2006) Alpha1-, alpha2- and beta-adrenoceptors in the urinary bladder, urethra and prostate. Br J Pharmacol 147(Suppl 2):S88–119

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwinn DA, Roehrborn CG (2008) Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes and lower urinary tract symptoms. Int J Urol 15(3):193–199

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwinn DA et al (2004) Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype selectivity and lower urinary tract symptoms. Mayo Clin Proc 79:1423–1434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenny BA et al (1996) Evaluation of the pharmacological selectivity profile of alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonists at prostatic alpha 1 adrenoceptors: binding, functional and in vivo studies. Br J Pharmacol 118:871–878

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Akiyama K et al (1999) KMD-3213, a uroselective and long-acting a1a-adrenoceptor antagonist, tested in a novel rat model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 291:81–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Major-Walker K, Nandy I et al (2010) The effects of combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin on clinical outcomes in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 4‑year results from the CombAT study. Eur Urol 57(1):123–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Major-Walker K, Morrill B et al (2008) The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic enlargement: 2‑year results from the CombAT study. J Urol 179(2):616–621 (discussion 21)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roehrborn CG (2006) Three months’ treatment with the alpha1-blocker alfuzosin does not affect total or transition zone volume of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 9(2):121–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyle P, Robertson C, Manski R, Padley RJ, Roehrborn CG (2001) Meta-analysis of randomized trials of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 58(5):717–722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Djavan B, Chapple C, Milani S, Marberger M (2004) State of the art on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 64(6):1081–1088

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nickel JC, Sander S, Moon TD (2008) A meta-analysis of the vascular-related safety profile and efficacy of alpha-adrenergic blockers for symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Clin Pract 62(10):1547–1559

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang DF, Campbell JR (2005) Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with tamsulosin. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(4):664–673

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andriole G, Bruchovsky N, Chung LW, Matsumoto AM, Rittmaster R, Roehrborn C et al (2004) Dihydrotestosterone and the prostate: the scientific rationale for 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1399–1403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naslund MJ, Miner M (2007) A review of the clinical efficacy and safety of 5alpha-reductase inhibitors for the enlarged prostate. Clin Ther 29(1):17–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boyle P, Gould AL, Roehrborn CG (1996) Prostate volume predicts outcome of treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with finasteride: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urology 48(3):398–405

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J, Damiao R, Becher E, Minana B et al (2009) The influence of baseline parameters on changes in international prostate symptom score with dutasteride, tamsulosin, and combination therapy among men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and an enlarged prostate: 2‑year data from the CombAT study. Eur Urol 55(2):461–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Donohue JF, Sharma H, Abraham R, Natalwala S, Thomas DR, Foster MC (2002) Transurethral prostate resection and bleeding: a randomized, placebo controlled trial of role of finasteride for decreasing operative blood loss. J Urol 168(5):2024–2026

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nickel JC, Gilling P, Tammela TL, Morrill B, Wilson TH, Rittmaster RS (2011) Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS). BJU Int 108(3):388–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giuliano F, Uckert S, Maggi M, Birder L, Kissel J, Viktrup L (2013) The mechanism of action of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 63(3):506–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morelli A, Sarchielli E, Comeglio P, Filippi S, Mancina R, Gacci M et al (2011) Phosphodiesterase type 5 expression in human and rat lower urinary tract tissues and the effect of tadalafil on prostate gland oxygenation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Sex Med 8(10):2746–2760

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gacci M, Corona G, Salvi M, Vignozzi L, McVary KT, Kaplan SA et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with alpha-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 61(5):994–1003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chess-Williams R, Chapple CR, Yamanishi T, Yasuda K, Sellers DJ (2001) The minor population of M3-receptors mediate contraction of human detrusor muscle in vitro. J Auton Pharmacol 21(5–6):243–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abrams P, Kelleher C, Staskin D, Kay R, Martan A, Mincik I et al (2017) Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: exploratory responder analyses of efficacy and evaluation of patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, double-blind, factorial, dose-ranging, Phase II study (SYMPHONY). World J Urol 35(5):827–838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuo HC, Lee KS, Na Y, Sood R, Nakaji S, Kubota Y et al (2015) Results of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled, multicenter study of mirabegron, a beta3-adrenoceptor agonist, in patients with overactive bladder in Asia. Neurourol Urodyn 34(7):685–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wagg A, Nitti VW, Kelleher C, Castro-Diaz D, Siddiqui E, Berner T (2016) Oral pharmacotherapy for overactive bladder in older patients: mirabegron as a potential alternative to antimuscarinics. Curr Med Res Opin 32(4):621–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, Andriole GL Jr., Dixon CM, Kusek JW et al (2003) The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 349(25):2387–2398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barkin J, Guimaraes M, Jacobi G, Pushkar D, Taylor S, van Vierssen Trip OB (2003) Alpha-blocker therapy can be withdrawn in the majority of men following initial combination therapy with the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride. Eur Urol 44(4):461–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Gong J, Sun F, Guan Z (2012) Add-on fesoterodine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men receiving alpha-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. BJU Int 109(12):1831–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang Y, Zhao XF, Li HZ, Wang W, Zhang Y, Xiao H et al (2007) Efficacy and safety of combined therapy with terazosin and tolteradine for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective study. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih 120(5):370–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Athanasopoulos A, Gyftopoulos K, Giannitsas K, Fisfis J, Perimenis P, Barbalias G (2003) Combination treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Urol 169(6):2253–2256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ichihara K, Masumori N, Fukuta F, Tsukamoto T, Iwasawa A, Tanaka Y (2015) A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tamsulosin monotherapy and its combination with mirabegron for overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic obstruction. J Urol 193(3):921–926

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Choi H, Kim HJ, Bae JH, Kim JH, du Moon G, Cheon J et al (2015) A meta-analysis of long- versus short-acting phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: comparing combination use with alpha-blockers and alpha-blocker monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Int Neurourol J 19(4):237–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Casabe A, Roehrborn CG, Da Pozzo LF, Zepeda S, Henderson RJ, Sorsaburu S et al (2014) Efficacy and safety of the coadministration of tadalafil once daily with finasteride for 6 months in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 191(3):727–733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmin Bektic FEBU.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J. Bektic und T. Burtscher geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

Hinweis des Verlags

Der Verlag bleibt in Hinblick auf geografische Zuordnungen und Gebietsbezeichnungen in veröffentlichten Karten und Institutsadressen neutral.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burtscher, T., Bektic, J. BPO/LUTS – Aktuelles zur medikamentösen Therapie. J. Urol. Urogynäkol. AT 26, 114–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-019-0076-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-019-0076-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation