Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extraction of Starch from Marine Microalgae, Chlorella salina: Efficiency and Recovery

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issues of plastic waste arise owing to the global increase in plastic demand, which has surpassed the plastic recycling rate. Microalgae have become a sustainable feedstock to produce biodegradable thermoplastic starch because of their high yield, high photosynthetic efficiency, ease of cultivation and eco-friendliness. This research was conducted to determine the efficiency of different methods for starch extraction and recovery. Starch was extracted through ultrasonication, bead-beating and physicochemical methods and then separated, dried and analysed with a Megazyme total starch analysis kit. Of these tested methods, the physicochemical method (90 °C, 30 min) was the most efficient method for starch extraction, where the starch increment was 323.05% ± 32.03% relative to the control. However, the bead-beating method was the most efficient method when starch recovery was conducted on Chlorella salina cells, exhibiting the highest increment (96.60% ± 2.73%). Therefore, the physicochemical and bead-beating methods were the viable methods for enhancing the efficiency of starch extraction and recovery, respectively.

Article Highlights

  • Physicochemical method (90 °C, 30 min) was the most efficient method for starch extraction.

  • Bead-beating method was the most efficient method in starch recovery (96.60% ± 2.73%) from Chlorella salina cells

  • The physicochemical and bead-beating methods were the ideal methods for starch extraction and recovery, respectively

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Hattab M, Ghaly A, Hammouda A (2015) Microalgae harvesting methods for industrial production of biodiesel: critical review and comparative analysis. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl 5(2):154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony CG (2009) Advances in preparation of biological extracts for protein purification. Methods Enzymol 463:285–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y, Moo-Young M (1986) Disruption of microbial cells for intracellular products. Enzyme Microb Technol 8:194–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccolini L, Taillandier P, Wilhem AM, Delmas H, Strehaiano P (1997) Low frequency thermo-ultrasonication of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions: effect of temperature and of ultrasonic power. J Chem Eng 65(2):145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daiana DS, Arthur FS, Denize RZ, Ligia DFM, Isabel CT (2016) Characterization of rice starch and protein obtained by a fast alkaline extraction method. Food Chem 191:36–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiana P, Enrica U, Hélène C, Ivet F (2014) Pretreatment of microalgae to improve biogas production: a review. Biores Technol 172:403–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira SP, Holz JCP, Costa JAV (2018) Influence on cultivation conditions in the heterotrophic lipid production of the microalga Chlorella minutissima. Int Food Res J 25(1):408–417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gourmelon G (2015) Global plastic production rises, recycling lags. WorldWatch Institute, Washington, DC, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S (1991) Bacterial cell disruption: a key unit operation in the recovery of intracellular product. Biotechnol Adv 9:217–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harun R, Danquah MK (2011) Influence of acid pre-treatment on microalgal biomass for bioethanol production. Process Biochem 46:304–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henrard AA, da Rosa GM, Moraes L, de Morais MG, Costa JAV (2014) Effect of the carbon concentration, blend concentration, and renewal rate in the growth kinetic of Chlorella sp. Sci World J 2014:2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imma G, Giuseppe O, Irene RK, Gerardino D, Antonino P, Antonio M (2017) Microalgae as new sources of starch: isolation and characterization of microalgal starch granules. Italian Assoc Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757238

  • Jayakar SS, Singhal RS (2012) Development of an efficient cell disruption method for release of lipoic acid from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Glob J Biotechnol Biochem 7(4):90–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeremy NM, Perumalla VR, Aramandla R (2011) Comparative evaluation of different cell lysis and extraction methods for studying benzo(a)pyrene metabolism in ht-29 colon cancer cell cultures. Cell Physiol Biochem 28(2):209–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koushal V, Sharma R, Sharma M, Sharma R, Sharma V (2014) Plastics: issues challenges and remediation. Int J Waste Resources 4:134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurokawa M, King PM, Wu X, Joyce EM, Mason TJ, Yamamoto K (2016) Effect of sonication frequency on the disruption of algae. Ultrason Sonochem 31:157–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Ding L, Sun J, Bousseta N, Vorobiev E (2016) Yeast cell disruption strategies for recovery of intracellular bio-active compounds—a review. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technols 36:181–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Louise LDS, Dominique SDH, Emerson AS, Louis WP (2014) Cultivation of nannochloropsis sp in brackish groundwater supplemented with municipal wastewater as a nutrient source. Braz Arch Biol Technol 57(2):171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludmil B, Jameela A (2002) Disrupting Escherichia coli: a comparison of methods. J Biochem Mol Biol 35(4):428–431

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleary BV, Solah V, Gibson TS (1994) Quantitative measurement of total starch in cereal flours and products. J Cereal Sci 20:51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCleary BV, Mcnally M, Rossiter P (2002) Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85(5):1103–1111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda JR, Passarinho PC, Gouveia L (2012) Pre-treatment optimization of Scenedesmus obliquus microalga for bioethanol production. Biores Technol 104:342–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry AH, Eckhoff SR (1992) Characteristics of alkali-extracted starch obtained from corn flour. Cereal Chem 69(3):296–303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyachi S, Kamiya A (1987) Wavelength effects on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in Chlorella. Plant Cell Physiol 19:277–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Monika PR, Trishnamoni G, Nikunj S (2015) Effect of salinity, ph, light intensity on growth and lipid production of microalgae for bioenergy application. J Biol Sci 15(4):260–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiha MZN, Fazilah A, Rajeev B, Alias AK (2010) Comparative susceptibilities of sago, potato and corn starches to alkali treatment. Food Chem 121:1053–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen MT, Choi SP, Lee J, Lee JH, Sim SJ (2009) Hydrothermal acid pretreatment of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii biomass for ethanol production. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:161–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Pacheco E, Canto-Pinto JC, Moo-Huchin VM, Estrada-Mota IA, Estrada-León RJ, Chel-Guerrero L (2016) Thermoplastic starch (TPS)-cellulosic fibers composites. In Matheus P (eds) Mechanical properties and water vapor barrier: a review. InTech, London

  • PlasticsEurope, Plastics–The Facts 2017 (2017) An analysis of european plastics production, demand and waste data. http://www.plasticseurope.org/applications/files/5715/1717/4180/Plastics_the_facts_2017FINAL_for_website_one_page. Accessed 25 Jan 2018

  • Ramakrishnan NR, Lau CL, Arbakariya BA (2008) The performance of a glass bead shaking technique for the disruption of Escherichia coli cells. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 13:613–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ŕeháćek J, Beran K, Bićik V (1969) Disintegration of microorganisms and preparation of yeast cell walls in a new type of disintegrator. Appl Microbiol 17:462–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahari J, Sapuan SM, El-shekeil YA, Ishak MR, Akhtar R (2016) Natural Fibre-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites. In: Visakh PM, Yu L (eds) Starch-based Blends, composites and nanocomposites, vol 37. Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, pp 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Salim S, Shi Z, Vermuë MH, Wijffels RH (2013) Effect of growth phase on harvesting characteristics, autoflocculation and lipid content of Ettlia texensis for microalgal biodiesel production. Biores Technol 138:214–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RS (2013) A comparative study on cell disruption methods for release of aspartase from E. coli K-12. Indian J Exp Biol 51:997–1003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sumit C, Ghosh SK, Suresh CP, Dey AN, Gopal S (2012) Deforestation: causes, effects and control strategies, global perspectives on sustainable forest management. In: Clement AO (ed). InTech. ISBN:978-953-51-0569-5

  • Syed HS, Ifikhar AR (2018) Ultrasonication and microwave assisted lipids extraction process (MALE) for microalgal biodiesel production. Adv Biotechnol Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.19080/AIBM.2018.08.555746

  • Usman M, Ishfaq MT, Mali SR, Iqbal M, Ishfaq B (2014) Alkaline extraction of starch from broken rice of Pakistan. Int J Innov Appl Stud 7(1):146–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay (2017) Non-food crops as feedstock for bioplastics. Is there a critical need? http://www.eai.in. Accessed 25 Feb 2018

  • Wang M, Lee E, Dilbeck MP, Liebelt M, Zhang Q, Ergas SJ (2017) Thermal pretreatment of microalgae for biomethane production: experimental studies, kinetics and energy analysis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 92:399–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weller CI, Paulsen MR, Steinberg MP (1988) Correlation of starch recovery with assorted quality factors of four corn hybrids. J Cereal Chem 65(5):392–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu S, Blennow A, Bojko M, Madsen F, Olsen CE, Engelsen SB (2002) Physico-chemical characterization of Floridean starch of red algae. Starch/Stärke 54:66–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B (2009) Alkaline extraction method of cottonseed protein isolate. Mod Appl Science 3(3):77–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author (Wong, P.Y.) is grateful to his supervisor (Dr. Lee Chee Keong) for his encouragement, advice and patient guidance throughout the whole research project. The authors would like to thank the School of Industrial Technology, USM for allowing her to use the available facilities and equipment in the laboratory throughout the study. The author (Lee, C.K.) would like to express his greatest gratitude to USM for giving him a USM Research Universiti grant (1001/PTEKIND/811273).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chee Keong Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, P.Y., Lai, Y.H., Puspanadan, S. et al. Extraction of Starch from Marine Microalgae, Chlorella salina: Efficiency and Recovery. Int J Environ Res 13, 283–293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-019-00173-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-019-00173-0

Keywords

Navigation